A couple from today.
Black-necked Stilt
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
Archibald You must be quackers! More info | Jul 09, 2015 23:44 | #1546 A couple from today. Image hosted by forum (736390) © Archibald [SHARE LINK] American CootTHIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (736391) © Archibald [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digitalparadise Awaiting the title ferry... More info | Jul 09, 2015 23:47 | #1547 |
dodgyexposure Goldmember More info | Jul 09, 2015 23:56 | #1548 T kwhy789 wrote in post #17626548 For the sports photographers, how does the IQ of the 100-400mm compare with the 70-200mm f/2.8 IS II? I'm finding I'm using more of the 200mm end on a 5DMII and could use more length in shooting basketball and golf. I tried the Canon 1.4X and 2X III extenders and did not like the drop off in IQ. The IQ of the 100-400 II is excellent and, I would say, comparable with the 70-200 II. Obviously, it's 2 stops slower at the long end, so that will affect where you can use it. For golf, I would say you could easily substitute the 100-400 for the 70-200 (as long as you can do without 70-100mm), but if the basketball is indoors, you might notice it a bit more, as you would no doubt have to bump up the ISO to compensate. Cheers, Damien
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pondrader "now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two" 16,028 posts Gallery: 2548 photos Best ofs: 5 Likes: 57084 Joined Aug 2012 Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada More info Post edited over 8 years ago by Pondrader. (3 edits in all) | Jul 10, 2015 05:55 | #1549 Now this is handheld at 30ft or so 7DII, 100-400LII, 1.4III ,. At 560mm Image hosted by forum (736411) © Pondrader [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ScottM Goldmember More info | Jul 10, 2015 08:05 | #1550 patrol50 wrote in post #17626105 just in the sharpness and just a crisper cleaner photo taken by the 111 compared to the 11 to my eyes - not really any noticebale difference in af or bokeh or maybe just a touch with the bokeh - i have often read where others say that about the 2 x 111 compared to the 11 but seems less prevalent with the 1.4 but it certainly is evident with mine cheers rob Thanks. I found a used one on Amazon for $365 (new is $429). With my $250 in credits it would be pretty inexpensive, but I still haven't been able to pull the trigger yet.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
patrol50 Senior Member More info | go for it i would - not a lot to lose as you can sell it for near that in the future if not happy with it C:- 7D Mk11 ; 7Dc ; 600D & SX10 IS / L:- EFS 10-22 f3.5-4.5 USM ; 55-250 f4-5.6 IS 11; 18 -200 f3.5-5.6 IS ; & EF 16- 35 f4 L IS USM , 24-105 f4 L IS USM; 70-200 f4 L IS USM; 100-400 f4.5-5.6 L IS 1 USM (V1 and V11); + C 1.4 Ext Mk3 & Tam 150 - 600 f5-6.3 DI VC USD.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
patrol50 Senior Member More info Post edited over 8 years ago by patrol50. | very nice for 560 and hand held at 1/200 jeff - but hey if your like me where is the other 3 or 4 shaky ones that did not show C:- 7D Mk11 ; 7Dc ; 600D & SX10 IS / L:- EFS 10-22 f3.5-4.5 USM ; 55-250 f4-5.6 IS 11; 18 -200 f3.5-5.6 IS ; & EF 16- 35 f4 L IS USM , 24-105 f4 L IS USM; 70-200 f4 L IS USM; 100-400 f4.5-5.6 L IS 1 USM (V1 and V11); + C 1.4 Ext Mk3 & Tam 150 - 600 f5-6.3 DI VC USD.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pondrader "now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two" 16,028 posts Gallery: 2548 photos Best ofs: 5 Likes: 57084 Joined Aug 2012 Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada More info | ha, true ...Im having a hard time trying to take a bad shot with the 100-400LII the IS is so good,.. I did get some motion blur.......he's fast lol Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 11, 2015 06:49 | #1554 from ma recent shots ... Image hosted by forum (736553) © mbehzadpix [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Nikon D810 | Tamron 15-30 | Nikon 24-120 | Nikon 200-500 5.6| Nikon 50 1.8 | Tamron 85 1.8, ...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jeetsukumaran Senior Member More info Post edited over 8 years ago by jeetsukumaran. | Jul 11, 2015 08:27 | #1555 For those looking for a carry solution, let me very strongly (again) recommend the Cotton Carrier. Gallery: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jeetsukumaran/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
recrisp Goldmember More info | Jul 11, 2015 15:04 | #1556 jeetsukumaran wrote in post #17627818 For those looking for a carry solution, let me very strongly (again) recommend the Cotton Carrier.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FarmerTed1971 fondling the 5D4 More info | Jul 11, 2015 16:15 | #1557 Finally sorting through my shots from Montana last month and liked these three of a Killdeer I was chasing around out in a field... IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/vTymu6Getting better at this - Fuji X-t5 & X-t3 - 16 1.4 - 35/50/90 f2 - 50-140 - flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 11, 2015 16:15 | #1558 recrisp wrote in post #17628151 I have heard of this, but didn't think too much about one. After you made such a BIG DEAL about this, I checked into one, I saw some videos, checked it out on Amazon, and I think I may just have to get one. (Thanks to you!) This looks like it's be a LOT better than what I use now, which is a Rapid Strap (Sports), I like it, but it doesn't do what the Cotton Carrier does. The reviews on these things are also very good, so that gives me some hope. Also, this appears that it'd be ideal for when I use my kayak, it's out of the way, and looks like I could paddle fine. What I wish you could do though is to do a short review and place it on a forum here so that others who may not see this thread could learn about it, plus, here, it may detract from this thread. (I'm glad that you did though!) ![]() So, thank you for letting us know, and I hope to get one, I actually am thinking about the dual vest, so I can carry both of my cameras safely. Randy Maybe I am waxing a little too enthusiastic! But honestly, I see so many people recommending/using BR sling straps, I think this is a truly inferior solution in every important aspect compared to the Cotton Carrier (with the exception of, perhaps, looking non-geeky!). [Actually, as an aside, even in the world of BR-style sling straps, I think the BR is a poorly-designed product relative to, for example, the Sun Sniper; but that is another story.] Gallery: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jeetsukumaran/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 11, 2015 16:19 | #1559 another one at the same location ... Image hosted by forum (736633) © mbehzadpix [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Nikon D810 | Tamron 15-30 | Nikon 24-120 | Nikon 200-500 5.6| Nikon 50 1.8 | Tamron 85 1.8, ...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digitalparadise Awaiting the title ferry... More info | Jul 11, 2015 16:48 | #1560 Nice. Image Editing OK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 708 guests, 146 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||