Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 17 Dec 2014 (Wednesday) 10:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM Review WOW!

 
CyberDyneSystems
THREAD ­ STARTER
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,908 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Apr 23, 2016 15:06 |  #3616

clipper_from_oz wrote in post #17981552 (external link)
one from the local wetlands nearby me...Its a wet Black Shouldered Kite

BTW....Im finding the 5DSR and 100-400Mk2 IS combo is an absolute powehouse when it gets a subject locked on at 400mm from a medium distance. To my eyes its almost approaching the sharpness of primes.

Other great advantage of the Mk2 IS is I can handhold sharp at 400mm on the 5DSR at mid range shutter speeds (1/250 th sec) whereas I couldnt on my older Mk1 IS. This was mainly due to the fact the 5DSR's vast number of "on target pixels" meant I had to use more than 2-3x focal length on older Mk1 to get rid of camera shake and sometimes I just didnt have the light to go up in SS Now Im getting a couple of extra stops its increased my keepers by heaps although this shot doesnt demonstrate this as it was shot at a faster speed.
Hosted photo: posted by clipper_from_oz in
./showthread.php?p=179​81552&i=i92126183
forum: Canon Lenses


Ok, there's no logic to it, but this looks sharper and more detailed than anything I am used to seeing in this thread. Is it possible that even after all the web resizing etc, the 5Dsr is offering such superior overall detail?


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Apr 23, 2016 15:06 |  #3617

MedicineMan4040 wrote in post #17981676 (external link)
The 100-400ii will go down in history as the greatest EOS lens. I say this having owned 400/5.6 and currently owning 300/2.8isii, 400DOii, and 500isii. When the 1DXii get's here it will be my first choice in wildlife/birding.

Tall tale... some would say the UWA or 200 F2 or 85 1.2 II type stuff.

Many lenses out there dood.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
THREAD ­ STARTER
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,908 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
Post edited over 7 years ago by CyberDyneSystems.
     
Apr 23, 2016 15:11 |  #3618

JM45ACP wrote in post #17981239 (external link)
Just curious if anyone has experienced this I had the camera on my truck seat the other day when I grabbed it I moved the focus ring quite a bit when I went to focus it wouldn't I had to hit the focus button a few times it seemed like it was getting jammed . So I set up some soda cans set it on a tripod and focused no issues then I proceeded to unfocus it and the same thing happened it wants to focus but it's like its getting jammed. If I move the focus ring say a 1/4 turn it focuses fine if it goes further it takes a few times to get it to focus it doesn't matter if its in AI Servo or One Shot 100mm or 400mm.
Thanks
John


skid00skid00 wrote in post #17982053 (external link)
"Lens drive when AF impossible"

I thought of this when I read it first as well, but I don't think it sounds right. John's description of being "jammed" does not sound like "not even trying" which is the behavior when you have "hunting" disabled.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
THREAD ­ STARTER
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,908 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Apr 23, 2016 15:13 |  #3619

Talley wrote in post #17982252 (external link)
Tall tale... some would say the UWA or 200 F2 or 85 1.2 II type stuff.

Many lenses out there dood.


I agree with MedicineMan. The 200mm is in/has been in the hands of so few, it and the 85 are so niche, that they are a different kind of beast all together. This 100-400mm is near perfect for so many jobs, it is the literal Swiss army knife, and it does it all so well. It has likely out sold the 200mm and 85mm combined by orders of magnitude in it's first year.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Apr 23, 2016 15:31 |  #3620

The greatest? 135 comes to mind.

Just too much to offer out there to be called greatest.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JM45ACP
Senior Member
Avatar
715 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Likes: 639
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Ct. USA
     
Apr 23, 2016 18:28 |  #3621

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #17982255 (external link)
JM45ACP wrote in post #17981239 (external link)
Just curious if anyone has experienced this I had the camera on my truck seat the other day when I grabbed it I moved the focus ring quite a bit when I went to focus it wouldn't I had to hit the focus button a few times it seemed like it was getting jammed . So I set up some soda cans set it on a tripod and focused no issues then I proceeded to unfocus it and the same thing happened it wants to focus but it's like its getting jammed. If I move the focus ring say a 1/4 turn it focuses fine if it goes further it takes a few times to get it to focus it doesn't matter if its in AI Servo or One Shot 100mm or 400mm.
Thanks
John



skid00skid00 wrote in post #17982053 (external link)
"Lens drive when AF impossible"

I thought of this when I read it first as well, but I don't think it sounds right. John's description of being "jammed" does not sound like "not even trying" which is the behavior when you have "hunting" disabled.

I checked and Lens drive when AF impossible is set to on.



5D MARK IV== 7D Mark II==7D == EF 24-105mm f4L IS USM == EF 100mm f/2.8LMacro==70-200mm f2.8L IS II USM == EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM UD == EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM==Speedlite 430 EX II PHOTO EDITING OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,672 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16800
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Apr 23, 2016 18:40 |  #3622

IMAGE: http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d74/Zenon1/7D2/Reds/sfd_zpsblqs4jvz.jpg

Crop

IMAGE: http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d74/Zenon1/7D2/Reds/eee_zps9gxwowpz.jpg

Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,504 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 50960
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Apr 23, 2016 18:42 |  #3623

digital paradise wrote in post #17982502 (external link)
QUOTED IMAGE

Crop

QUOTED IMAGE

That's power, being able to crop like that.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Koerner
Senior Member
734 posts
Likes: 68
Joined Jun 2011
Location: San Dimas, CA
     
Apr 23, 2016 22:14 |  #3624
bannedPermanent ban

Archibald wrote in post #17980932 (external link)
Another 100-400 II macro.
Hosted photo: posted by Archibald in
./showthread.php?p=179​80932&i=i70808295
forum: Canon Lenses

Lotta noise and blurred detail ...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Koerner
Senior Member
734 posts
Likes: 68
Joined Jun 2011
Location: San Dimas, CA
Post edited over 7 years ago by John Koerner.
     
Apr 23, 2016 22:15 |  #3625
bannedPermanent ban

Archibald wrote in post #17982505 (external link)
That's power, being able to crop like that.

For a Canon ...

I use the 300 VR II on a D810 (external link) for macro and there's a lot more detail, and less noise, in my crop grabs than that ..

Will post some images soon.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PJJ205
Senior Member
348 posts
Likes: 446
Joined Aug 2015
     
Apr 23, 2016 23:32 |  #3626

John Koerner wrote in post #17982696 (external link)
For a Canon ...

I use the 300 VR II on a D810 (external link) for macro and there's a lot more detail, and less noise, in my crop grabs than that ..

Will post some images soon.

In this thread? What would be the point of that?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,504 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 50960
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Apr 23, 2016 23:36 |  #3627

PJJ205 wrote in post #17982754 (external link)
In this thread? What would be the point of that?

Shilling for Nikon.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
clipper_from_oz
Goldmember
Avatar
4,049 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 33325
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Currently in Darwin Australia
Post edited over 7 years ago by clipper_from_oz. (5 edits in all)
     
Apr 23, 2016 23:36 |  #3628

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #17982251 (external link)
Ok, there's no logic to it, but this looks sharper and more detailed than anything I am used to seeing in this thread. Is it possible that even after all the web resizing etc, the 5Dsr is offering such superior overall detail?


In the case of the Kite sharpness/detail I put it down to a few things coming together.

1. No AA filter in play( has AA Bypass) so will be sharper than a AA filter sensor and 50MP of detail captured will obviously add to this ....although downsampling will bin a lot of this detail...Thats the interesting part because in 5dsr case pixel pitch size is smaller but there are way more of them. So Im thinking the POTN downsampling whilst binning a lot of the detail is somehow able to use this detail to reconstruct a sharper more detailed lower resolution 1200 image

2. Superfast shutter speed of 1/3200... Too fast for even 5dsr shake to be evident

3. Aperture f9 not far from sweetspot which will probably give better sharpness than wider aperture settings

4. Absolutely No atmospheric impact between lens and subject as I was only 4 -5 meters max away ( using camo poncho allowed me to get very close and closer than I can normally get to these guys ).


Basically all the planets were aligned that day because its the sharpest I have personally got from this lens especially on a difficult to get close to subject like this

rgds


Clipper
R5, 5DSR, Fotoman 6x17cm Large Format Panorama Camera,Mamiya Universal 6x9
Canon EF 16-35mm f4 L, 17mm TSE f4 L,50mm f1.4, 24-70 f2.8 L, 70-200mm F4 L, 85mm f1.8, 100-400mm II L,
EF 400mm f2.8 IS II L, RF 600mm f4 IS L
Rodenstock, Sinar& Nikkor LF lens for Pano (75,95,150+210mm)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MedicineMan4040
The Magic Johnson of Cameras
Avatar
22,570 posts
Gallery: 1956 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 79448
Joined Jul 2013
     
Apr 23, 2016 23:38 as a reply to  @ Archibald's post |  #3629

Agreed, post in the Nik thread.


flickr (external link)
Vid Collection: https://www.youtube.co​m/user/medicineman4040 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MedicineMan4040
The Magic Johnson of Cameras
Avatar
22,570 posts
Gallery: 1956 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 79448
Joined Jul 2013
     
Apr 23, 2016 23:40 as a reply to  @ CyberDyneSystems's post |  #3630

Swiss Army Knife=perfect description.


flickr (external link)
Vid Collection: https://www.youtube.co​m/user/medicineman4040 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,420,169 views & 40,661 likes for this thread, 481 members have posted to it and it is followed by 286 members.
EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM Review WOW!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
656 guests, 142 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.