Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 17 Dec 2014 (Wednesday) 10:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM Review WOW!

 
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,513 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6391
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Feb 16, 2018 01:05 |  #7576

chuckmiller wrote in post #18564838 (external link)
I cannot look through 505 pages of posts. Is anyone using this lens with a Canon teleconverter 1.4x iii or a 2x iii? If you are how is the image quality?

Previous page, post #7555.
I posted pics with 2X TC as well as stacked 2X and 1.4x TC.


Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,673 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16802
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Feb 16, 2018 03:01 |  #7577

chuckmiller wrote in post #18564838 (external link)
I cannot look through 505 pages of posts. Is anyone using this lens with a Canon teleconverter 1.4x iii or a 2x iii? If you are how is the image quality?

Like this 1.4 III

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/02/3/LQ_900268.jpg
Image hosted by forum (900268) © digital paradise [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Crop

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/02/3/LQ_900269.jpg
Image hosted by forum (900269) © digital paradise [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,673 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16802
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
Post edited over 5 years ago by digital paradise.
     
Feb 16, 2018 03:10 |  #7578

Chuck that owl was about a year ago. This is from the other day.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/02/3/LQ_900271.jpg
Image hosted by forum (900271) © digital paradise [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Crop

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/02/3/LQ_900272.jpg
Image hosted by forum (900272) © digital paradise [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,673 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16802
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Feb 16, 2018 03:12 |  #7579

I'll see if I can get some un or lightly cropped shots over the next few days.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chuckmiller
Goldmember
Avatar
4,187 posts
Gallery: 65 photos
Likes: 10547
Joined May 2012
Location: Lakeland, Florida
     
Feb 16, 2018 04:17 |  #7580

From your shots I'd say it works just fine !! :) Thank you.


.
.
.
Retired from Fire/Rescue with 30 years on the job - January 2019

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Avatar
16,028 posts
Gallery: 2548 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 57084
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada
Post edited over 5 years ago by Pondrader. (4 edits in all)
     
Feb 16, 2018 07:13 |  #7581

chuckmiller wrote in post #18564838 (external link)
I cannot look through 505 pages of posts. Is anyone using this lens with a Canon teleconverter 1.4x iii or a 2x iii? If you are how is the image quality?

Everyone is... 40 foot.. 30 feet above them, hand held shot down an embankment ... cropped to the very few pixels in the centre of the image!!!

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/02/3/LQ_900132.jpg
Photo from Pondrader's gallery.
Image hosted by forum (900132)
Muskrat Handheld sitting on shore.. shooting across the water to the hut

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/02/3/LQ_900293.jpg
Image hosted by forum (900293) © Pondrader [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Avatar
16,028 posts
Gallery: 2548 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 57084
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada
Post edited over 5 years ago by Pondrader.
     
Feb 16, 2018 07:55 |  #7582

chuckmiller wrote in post #18564838 (external link)
I cannot look through 505 pages of posts. Is anyone using this lens with a Canon teleconverter 1.4x iii or a 2x iii? If you are how is the image quality?

Its a question that is timeless... Dont mind answering the call... I have thousands of um

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/02/3/LQ_900300.jpg
Image hosted by forum (900300) © Pondrader [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/02/3/LQ_900301.jpg
Image hosted by forum (900301) © Pondrader [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Avatar
16,028 posts
Gallery: 2548 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 57084
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada
     
Feb 16, 2018 08:12 |  #7583

As Doug from... Forged in Fire... Would say.... It Will Kill lol

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/02/3/LQ_900303.jpg
Image hosted by forum (900303) © Pondrader [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
docg
Goldmember
Avatar
1,057 posts
Gallery: 279 photos
Likes: 9886
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Arkansas, USA
     
Feb 16, 2018 08:48 |  #7584

Nice images Jeff, especially the Hummingbird shots. A-1, top notch!!

Since we're on the subject of extenders here's a question.

I have a 1.4 II extender that I use occasionally with the 7D MK II and the 100‑400mm f/4.5‑5.6L IS II USM. The 1.4 II stays in the bag most of the time. In most cases I'm just not happy with the image quality. I was wondering with the 1.4 III if there would be any improvement in image quality? Enough improvement to justify the cost?


Doc
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Avatar
16,028 posts
Gallery: 2548 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 57084
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada
     
Feb 16, 2018 09:00 |  #7585

docg wrote in post #18565066 (external link)
Nice images Jeff, especially the Hummingbird shots. A-1, top notch!!

Since we're on the subject of extenders here's a question.

I have a 1.4 II extender that I use occasionally with the 7D MK II and the 100‑400mm f/4.5‑5.6L IS II USM. The 1.4 II stays in the bag most of the time. In most cases I'm just not happy with the image quality. I was wondering with the 1.4 III if there would be any improvement in image quality? Enough improvement to justify the cost?

Some say yes... Others say not so much... Shooting with the extender kinda doubles the amount of motion blur you could get in your image. If you up your shutter or skills just a bit it all comes together. I would regularly take a camera out of the hands of someone saying their camera was not right and shoot the moon handheld and hand it back to them. its all about ( yes I call it Trigger control ) I know some wonder how to get trigger from a camera but I guess they dont have a gun back ground.. And following through. Meaning don't just snap. yes its just a handheld shot of the moon but it has detail.. somewhat.

And I think..Not all cameras and lens belong and or do well together. but could on a different copy. They just aren't all exactly the same. I've used 9 7DII's and they were all different. Your camera and the 100-400LII may work wonderfully together.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/02/3/LQ_900310.jpg
Image hosted by forum (900310) © Pondrader [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/02/3/LQ_900311.jpg
Image hosted by forum (900311) © Pondrader [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Avatar
16,028 posts
Gallery: 2548 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 57084
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada
     
Feb 16, 2018 09:05 |  #7586

just the head cut out of that

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/02/3/LQ_900312.jpg
Image hosted by forum (900312) © Pondrader [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
keeperseeker
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,285 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Likes: 1862
Joined Dec 2011
Location: b.c. canada
     
Feb 16, 2018 09:08 |  #7587

Own all of them,,,much prefer using the 1.4x . seem to get better results with F9-F10,,and 1200+ shutter speed. and of course you need good light and a steadier hand. Don,t get as many keepers at all with the 2X,,,find a tripod increaser rate with 2x but i seldom use a tripod.


Never make a decision when you have to pee. L Cohen

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
docg
Goldmember
Avatar
1,057 posts
Gallery: 279 photos
Likes: 9886
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Arkansas, USA
     
Feb 16, 2018 09:19 as a reply to  @ Pondrader's post |  #7588

Thanks for the reply Jeff. Kind of what I expected, some will say yes and others not so much. I guess some of it may depend on the copy of camera/lens combination and as well as the skills and technique of the user.

Great moon shot btw.


Doc
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chuckmiller
Goldmember
Avatar
4,187 posts
Gallery: 65 photos
Likes: 10547
Joined May 2012
Location: Lakeland, Florida
     
Feb 16, 2018 09:19 |  #7589

Very impressive shots when you have the right environment. I won't be hesitant now to get the 2x.


.
.
.
Retired from Fire/Rescue with 30 years on the job - January 2019

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Avatar
16,028 posts
Gallery: 2548 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 57084
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada
Post edited over 5 years ago by Pondrader. (3 edits in all)
     
Feb 16, 2018 09:42 |  #7590

chuckmiller wrote in post #18565088 (external link)
Very impressive shots when you have the right environment. I won't be hesitant now to get the 2x.

I have like 8 terabyte of example's... Wasted more than a couple camera's on wildlife. I have never used the 2x


Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,421,406 views & 40,663 likes for this thread, 481 members have posted to it and it is followed by 286 members.
EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM Review WOW!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1066 guests, 164 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.