Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 18 Dec 2014 (Thursday) 05:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Panning

 
figo
Senior Member
Avatar
702 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Toronto
     
Dec 18, 2014 05:09 |  #1

What is your favourite aperture to use when panning athletes running/skating?
I've been using f2.8 lately and the success rate is low.


Canon 1D MKIV, 1D MKIII, Canon 70-200 f2.8, Canon 400 f2.8, Canon 16-35mm f2.8.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,366 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 811
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
     
Dec 18, 2014 05:19 |  #2

I would guess a smaller aperture would be easier to do while panning. Especially if the object you're trying to shoot is moving closer or farther away from you while you're panning. My guess is that f/8 or smaller would probably work better.


Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Dec 18, 2014 07:01 |  #3

CameraMan wrote in post #17339212 (external link)
I would guess a smaller aperture would be easier to do while panning. Especially if the object you're trying to shoot is moving closer or farther away from you while you're panning. My guess is that f/8 or smaller would probably work better.

Totally agree - f/2.8 is far too wide. As you are panning with the subject, you don't need to think about limiting the depth of field, as everything other than the subject will be blurred anyway.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DC ­ Fan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,881 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2005
     
Dec 18, 2014 07:19 |  #4

figo wrote in post #17339209 (external link)
What is your favourite aperture to use when panning athletes running/skating?
I've been using f2.8 lately and the success rate is low.

An aperture of f/2.8 should pose no problems. These images used f/2.8.


IMAGE: http://i1174.photobucket.com/albums/r601/kevinlillard/02053014a/20130223a99301110_zps56662e53.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://i1174.photobuck​et.com …a99301110_zps56​662e53.jpg  (external link) on photobucket

IMAGE: http://i1174.photobucket.com/albums/r601/kevinlillard/02053014a/20130223c0034_zpsc47482d3.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://i1174.photobuck​et.com …0223c0034_zpsc4​7482d3.jpg  (external link) on photobucket

Shutter speed likely is the issue. If you're using a slow shutter speed for a motion blur effect, then the number of so-called keepers will be low, because the slow shutter speed technique is notoriously inefficient.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NullMember
Goldmember
3,019 posts
Likes: 1130
Joined Nov 2009
     
Dec 18, 2014 07:26 |  #5
bannedPermanently

figo wrote in post #17339209 (external link)
What is your favourite aperture to use when panning athletes running/skating?
I've been using f2.8 lately and the success rate is low.

It would be a lot easier if you posted an image of one of your "failures" and explained to us what it is you actually want to achieve.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
warrenl
Junior Member
21 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2014
     
Dec 25, 2014 07:59 |  #6

What shutter speed are you using? Are you using a lens with IS?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
figo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
702 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Toronto
     
Dec 25, 2014 22:37 |  #7

Here is an example.

Camera Settings
f5.0 1/20 400mm ISO 100

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/12/4/LQ_704771.jpg
Image hosted by forum (704771) © figo [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon 1D MKIV, 1D MKIII, Canon 70-200 f2.8, Canon 400 f2.8, Canon 16-35mm f2.8.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
figo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
702 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Toronto
     
Dec 25, 2014 22:38 as a reply to  @ warrenl's post |  #8

1/20 and I'm using no IS but do have the ability to do so.


Canon 1D MKIV, 1D MKIII, Canon 70-200 f2.8, Canon 400 f2.8, Canon 16-35mm f2.8.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JJD.Photography
Goldmember
1,484 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 113
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Puerto Rico
Post edited over 8 years ago by JJD.Photography.
     
Dec 26, 2014 11:48 |  #9

figo wrote in post #17350886 (external link)
Here is an example.

Camera Settings
f5.0 1/20 400mm ISO 100

Excellent background motion at 1/20. I would try a fast shutter (1/40 - 1/60). I noticed my 1/30 keeper rate is much less than 1/50 or 1/60. I can't even imagine how I would do at 1/20. I think the shutter speed is what's important when panning as a blurred f/22 still makes for a very nice panning shot as long as the shutter is slowed down to show the motion.


His And Her Photographs (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
qdrummer21
Member
121 posts
Likes: 8
Joined May 2009
Location: Central, NH
     
Jan 08, 2015 14:52 |  #10

The effect DOF has on a photo shouldn't differ between a panning shot and a stationary shot for the majority of shots. That is to say, that if you have sufficient DOF to meet your subject focus requirements while the subject is stationary it should be sufficient while panning with the subject moving.

The one catch to this would be that depending on the speed and direction that the subject is traveling, relative to the direction you are panning, it is possible for certain faster subjects to exit the range of acceptable focus when using a slower SS. Generally though, the faster the subject the faster the SS even when panning.

So to answer the OP's question directly. When taking panning shots I am most concerned with getting a SS that is just fast enough to eliminate the motion blur of my subject, but slow enough to allow the relative motion of the background to blur. Once I have this identified what I use for my aperture is dictated by the selected SS and my ISO requirements.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,538 views & 2 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Panning
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1128 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.