Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 21 Dec 2014 (Sunday) 08:10
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

First shot at off-camera lighting

 
kv968
Member
159 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 43
Joined Jul 2014
Location: Central NJ
     
Dec 21, 2014 08:10 |  #1

Finally got my gf to agree to do some modeling while I tried my hand at some off-camera flash. Not sure which I like better but any C&C's are more than welcome.


IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/12/3/LQ_704148.jpg
Image hosted by forum (704148) © kv968 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/12/3/LQ_704149.jpg
Image hosted by forum (704149) © kv968 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

instagram.com/shooting​anything (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cuypers1807
Intact?
Avatar
1,840 posts
Likes: 414
Joined May 2008
Location: Equally far from everything!
     
Dec 21, 2014 08:19 |  #2

Like the composition. For me the B&W version is better but I think your light source is too low. The shadows on her face will look more natural if you have the light higher than her face.... Unless you were going for the monster lighting look and then it is fine.


Joby
Flickr (external link)_________My Site (external link)___________Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kv968
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
159 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 43
Joined Jul 2014
Location: Central NJ
Post edited over 8 years ago by kv968.
     
Dec 21, 2014 08:28 |  #3

Thanks Cuypers. Definitely not going for the "monster lighting" look but I see what you mean. I'll try again with a higher placement. It's just kinda hard getting a steep angle using the Apollo softbox since the movement is somewhat limited. I'll figure something out.


instagram.com/shooting​anything (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cuypers1807
Intact?
Avatar
1,840 posts
Likes: 414
Joined May 2008
Location: Equally far from everything!
     
Dec 21, 2014 08:54 |  #4

Watch the shadow on her nose change as you move the light. Humans are accustomed to seeing light from above with shadows moving downward. Studio lighting is a lot of fun ( if you find a willing subject) so go crazy trying different patterns out. Get some cheap white foam board to use as fill.


Joby
Flickr (external link)_________My Site (external link)___________Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kv968
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
159 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 43
Joined Jul 2014
Location: Central NJ
     
Dec 22, 2014 15:43 as a reply to  @ Cuypers1807's post |  #5

I'll definitely give some other angles a shot. I do have a reflector and tried to use it for some bounce but A) didn't have anyway to hold it and B) didn't really have enough room. I should be getting another flash for Xmas so I'll have to experiment with that and some ratios as well. And little does she know but my gf will be the "willing subject" ;-)a


instagram.com/shooting​anything (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
quadwing
Goldmember
Avatar
1,029 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 33
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
     
Dec 22, 2014 17:10 |  #6

I agree, the B&W is better. I'd personally try lighting from the opposite side, so that her hair is somewhat lit as well. I'd also increase the contrast of the B&W in post. Past that, as someone else here said, raise your light up a little bit, and shoot downward--that may look a bit better.

:) Good job!


Camera gear: Canon 5D Mark IV | Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L II | Lights: Elinchrom Ranger RX Speed AS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Post edited over 8 years ago by Alveric.
     
Dec 22, 2014 17:31 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

I'd place the light on the opposite side as well; and higher. Having the light hit women squarely in the chest makes them look broader than they really are, whilst having the light raking them across the garment slims them.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kv968
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
159 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 43
Joined Jul 2014
Location: Central NJ
Post edited over 8 years ago by kv968.
     
Dec 23, 2014 04:29 as a reply to  @ Alveric's post |  #8

Thank you both. I'll have to try that angle as well. I think I'm going to have to start paying her:-) It would definitely help with brightness of the chest (which I had to tone down a bit). I'm going to also try a second flash as a hair light as well if Santa brings me one.

A couple of other questions I have...do the eyes look out of focus? They seem a bit out to me but when I zoom they're pretty sharp. Can't understand why unless I need to start using my glasses more often.

And also, does the color one look a little on the "green" side to you. I used a passport for WB and color profiling but to me it made it look a little green or maybe a little too cool. Albeit the corrected WB without profiling was a little too warm. I have my monitor calibrated but I'm just wondering if I'm seeing things that aren't there. Trying to train my eye to color as well.


instagram.com/shooting​anything (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,123 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
First shot at off-camera lighting
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1321 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.