Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
Thread started 22 Dec 2014 (Monday) 13:16
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Are you Focal Length Limited?"
I am FLL less than 50% of the time.
15
34.1%
I am FLL more than 50% of the time
29
65.9%

44 voters, 44 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Are you Focal Length Limited??

 
jhayesvw
Cream of the Crop
7,230 posts
Gallery: 167 photos
Likes: 271
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Tucson AZ
     
Dec 22, 2014 13:16 |  #1

A thread on the Camera vs Camera forum has a great discussion going on about the 1dx vs 7d2 for birding. Charlie and I have been talking a bit about Focal Length Limited situations.
I would like to know how often you are FLL.

As a side note, I would you to post up your results in a reply with your type of shooting.
Are you a backyard birder or are you a hiking birder or somewhere in between?
If you could also add your gear you use (body and lenses) that would be great.

Thank you all.



My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jhayesvw
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
7,230 posts
Gallery: 167 photos
Likes: 271
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Tucson AZ
     
Dec 22, 2014 13:17 |  #2

Oops. I forgot to start.

I am FLL MOST of the time. Probably upwards of 90% of the time.
I shoot with the 7d mk1 and 100-400L mk1.

I am a hiking type and hike for miles to get my shots of birds/wildlife in their natural habitat.



My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sparky98
Goldmember
1,130 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 9
Joined Dec 2005
Location: East Texas
     
Dec 22, 2014 15:08 |  #3

I was usually FLL when shooting birds using a 7D and 100-400L but now have a 5DIII so it is even worse. I will probably start using the 7D again for birds but am considering buying a 1.4 TC for a little extra help.


Joe
5DIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Duane ­ N
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,075 posts
Gallery: 198 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 2219
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Chesapeake, VA USA
     
Dec 22, 2014 15:34 |  #4

I started out being FLL with the 70-200mm lens (just started my birding hobby converting from motocross photography). I then stepped up to a 400mm f/5.6L and still found myself being FLL about 90% of the time. After doing some homework and being able to try out a 500mm f/4L I purchased one about 1 1/2 years later. Now I find myself FLL about 50% of the time even using a 1.4 extender on the 500mm. I like where I'm at now because if it were easy I would get bored quickly and move onto another hobby...I like the challenge of learning my subjects habits then planning how I'm going to approach it.

I do seek out more cooperative subjects but it's still a challenge trying to predict where they're going to be for the shot I'm after. Most of the time it's just pure luck putting yourself in the ideal position and getting the shot I want without stressing out my subject.

As far as what type of photographer I am...I'm kind of a mix of them all. My backyard is my practice area where I know my subjects and they know me. I do hike and search out my subjects as well. I also do a lot of scouting while driving around town and in rural areas where I live and elsewhere.

My current gear is a Canon 1D4, 500mm f/4L plus a Canon 1.4III extender and of course my trusty tripod.

Great topic by the way.


www.3rdicreations.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelPusher
Goldmember
Avatar
1,929 posts
Gallery: 85 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1205
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Surf City, USA - Left Coast
     
Dec 22, 2014 15:48 |  #5

Large shore birds and birds of prey seems to be no problem with focal length with my setup. It's those pesky little finches and warblers that have me always wishing for more. 7Dc, 500F4, 1.4 TC. I also tend to hike a bit as well. Nothing but common birds hang in my back yard, so hiking is what works best in my case.


Robert

SmugMug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
teekay
Goldmember
Avatar
3,037 posts
Likes: 799
Joined Apr 2001
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Post edited over 8 years ago by teekay with reason 'Typo'.
     
Dec 22, 2014 17:51 as a reply to  @ PixelPusher's post |  #6

No, not FLL! I have an SX50 (1200mm equivalent) that is ideal for IDing birds near and far. For quality, of course, I'm aperture and sensor limited;-)a




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huntersdad
Goldmember
4,870 posts
Likes: 652
Joined Nov 2008
     
Dec 23, 2014 07:20 |  #7

I shoot a 1Dx and am currently trying a 7D2 with a 100-400II and 600. I am not FLL most of the time and really view it this way: If I can't get the shot with the afore mentioned gear and use of TCs, I don't need to be taking it. Because I spend a lot time shooting longish distances in a NWR, sometimes the birds cooperate and sometimes they do not. Can't control everything.


Facebook (external link)

http://WWW.BLENDEDLIGH​TPHOTOGRAPHY.COM (external link)
1DxIII x 2 / 24 1.4 II / Sigma 35 1.4 / 85 1.4L / 70-200L II / 300 II / AD600Pros

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Avatar
16,028 posts
Gallery: 2548 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 57084
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada
     
Dec 25, 2014 18:35 |  #8

Birds yes, big game not so much, big bears definitely lol


Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jhayesvw
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
7,230 posts
Gallery: 167 photos
Likes: 271
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Tucson AZ
     
Dec 25, 2014 20:02 |  #9

Geez Jeff,

Being that this is the BIRD forum I figured you would realize this pertains to birds not mammals.
 :p



My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Grizz1
Goldmember
Avatar
1,947 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1121
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Northeast Missouri
     
Dec 25, 2014 23:31 |  #10

I voted FLL more than 50% of the time and this occurs when I'm in the field hiking and hunting.
I shoot a 60D with Sigma 150-500, yes I dream of different gear but I'm also FL (Financially Limited).
When I'm shooting birds in the yard, distance is not a problem or I should say with just a small amount of effort I can close the distance. Most of my time is spent outdoors working in the country, often my camera gear is nearby and many opportunities come my way but there seems to often be that distance factor where my results are merely documentation, nothing more.
If I want to get better results I'm going to have to work harder for them and it is possible, I'm just not sacrificing enough time. I know I can do better with what I have but it's hard not to dream of those white 600 and 800mm lenses on a different body.
So to be honest, I'm in between a backyard birder and a hiking birder with my best results thus far in the yard.

It's hard not to discuss what I would like to have for shooting Whitetail Deer but after seeing what happened to Jeff I don't dare go there!


Steve
2 Canon 60D's, 70D 18-135,-55-250, Sigma 150-500 OS,Sigma 50mm 1.4 ,Sigma 120-300 Sport,Sigma 10-20. 580EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jhayesvw
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
7,230 posts
Gallery: 167 photos
Likes: 271
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Tucson AZ
     
Dec 26, 2014 09:01 |  #11

Lol!



My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
greenjeans
Goldmember
Avatar
3,324 posts
Gallery: 290 photos
Likes: 15067
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Greenville, SC
     
Dec 26, 2014 19:27 |  #12

I shoot with a 70D and T3i with the 400mm F5.6L and find myself wishing I had more reach most of the time. I can do pretty well in the backyard, but we spend quite a bit of time on the coast and I really wish I had more reach there. I sometimes use the 400mm on my 6d because it crops so well.


6D, 6DII, 70D, 80D, R10, RP, Lumix DC-FZ80 and a bag full of lenses.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blaked
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
14 posts
Joined Jan 2012
Location: California
     
Dec 26, 2014 21:07 |  #13

FLL hardly ever, however there's always those times where I'm just short of snapping a candid photo from my car.


Vimeo (external link) // Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Avatar
16,028 posts
Gallery: 2548 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 57084
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada
Post edited over 8 years ago by Pondrader. (2 edits in all)
     
Dec 27, 2014 04:39 |  #14

Sorry Jeremy, I do believe Jeremy and I hunt ( and it is hunting) BIRDS very much the same. Im a one camera one lens kind of shooter. I tend to drive to a destination and do a ton of hiking learning the habits and where abouts of say a GG and then plan the intersect point like Duane and put myself where I think that owl is going to pass, even if the bird is in sight I move to where he will be next not where he is. I guess I had to learn this cutting them off technique being that I was limited to 300mm. The country I am in I think helps because there are small open ponds and spruce bog with a back drop of heavy boreal forest which makes it impossible to sneak on anything or see it for that matter.


Im prone to giving to much information lol, seems I don't know when to stop. ...Snap there I go again !!


Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jhayesvw
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
7,230 posts
Gallery: 167 photos
Likes: 271
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Tucson AZ
     
Dec 27, 2014 08:05 |  #15

Jeff, I was just messing with you that this thread is about if you have enough lens for birds.
Mammals are obviously larger than birds and sometimes need less lens.

Small birds in the wild need 800mm or more usually. It's very rare that I'm not FLL on them.
I hike as I stated above. When I find a bird I wait to see if it will let me approach. Knowing where a tiny bird will go is next to impossible. Egrets and heron are easy. But warblers are impossible. It's all fun and a challenge. It would be less difficult if I had a bigger lens. And that is the point of the thread. As FL pertains to birds. ;-)a



My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,976 views & 4 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Are you Focal Length Limited??
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1433 guests, 104 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.