Bang on set.
Every shot is sharp with very good colors.
What was your approximate distance to the bird?
jhayesvw Cream of the Crop More info | Dec 25, 2014 20:51 | #16 Bang on set.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 25, 2014 20:53 | #17 Excellent images and a beautiful test subject! Good to see you Harv! Hope to see more images from you and the new lens. Brad
LOG IN TO REPLY |
akadmon Member 221 posts Likes: 49 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Massachusetts More info Post edited over 8 years ago by akadmon. | Dec 25, 2014 22:44 | #18 I have this lens and I like it, but I will never match the quality of theses photos, so long as I'm shooting with a 70D 100% Canon!!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rajivsubs Member 39 posts Joined Nov 2012 More info | Dec 26, 2014 02:11 | #19 Excellent shots, the new lens seems to be a much improved!! Which camera body did you use? Rajiv
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Harvey_G THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 5,378 posts Likes: 11 Joined Mar 2007 Location: Cobourg, Ontario, Canada More info | Dec 26, 2014 04:51 | #20 jhayesvw wrote in post #17350790 Bang on set. Every shot is sharp with very good colors. What was your approximate distance to the bird? Thank you. From what I remember I would say perhaps 20-25 feet. Possibly slightly more. We did not want to push too hard and have the bird abandon it's meal. txcanon wrote in post #17350795 Excellent images and a beautiful test subject! Good to see you Harv! Hope to see more images from you and the new lens. Thanks a lot. I'll do what I can so long as the weather and these old legs allow. akadmon wrote in post #17350893 I have this lens and I like it, but I will never match the quality of theses photos, so long as I'm shooting with a 70D On a side note, I find I can get sharper photos handheld than when the lens is perched on my monopod! Did not expect this. Seems like my own two feet provide more stability. Have any of you had the same experience with large lenses? Thanks for your kind words. Don't underestimate your 70D. It has an excellent reputation for producing high quality images. rajivsubs wrote in post #17351011 Excellent shots, the new lens seems to be a much improved!! Which camera body did you use? Thank you. Yes, the new version is much improved in many ways. Much better IS, much sharper than my previous version wide open, better contrast and much better balanced. -Harv-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 26, 2014 07:46 | #21 Outstanding shots Harvey! The perched shots are beautiful, but the one on the ground is a much tougher one to get. Super! PhilM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Harvey_G THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 5,378 posts Likes: 11 Joined Mar 2007 Location: Cobourg, Ontario, Canada More info | Dec 27, 2014 08:49 | #22 EyeSpyEagle wrote in post #17351179 Outstanding shots Harvey! The perched shots are beautiful, but the one on the ground is a much tougher one to get. Super! I have made the same initial observation as akadmon regarding the monopod & the new 100-400. I also do better handheld. :-/ Thanks a lot, Phil. I appreciate the kind words. -Harv-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bsmooth Senior Member 861 posts Likes: 13 Joined Feb 2005 Location: New England More info | Jan 16, 2015 11:49 | #23 Just wondered what you thought of this lens compared to your 400 5.6, especially on birds in flight ? Bruce
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Peter2516 Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 16, 2015 13:50 | #24 Absolutely stunning capture. Wow that the 100-400mm is very tempting. Thanks for sharing. Peter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Phoenixkh a mere speck More info | Jan 16, 2015 14:06 | #25 First of all.... amazing photographs. So clear, very detailed, yet natural. Kim (the male variety) Canon 1DX2 | 1D IV | 16-35 f/4 IS | 24-105 f/4 IS | 100L IS macro | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 100-400Lii | 50 f/1.8 STM | Canon 1.4X III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Grizz Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 16, 2015 15:01 | #26 Hmm how'd I miss this? Great stuff Harvey! Craig * Canon 7D Mark II * 60D * 10D * Tamron SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD * EF 400 5.6L USM * EF 17-40 4.0L USM * EF 70-210 4.0 * EF 28 2.8 * EF 50 1.8 MK1*Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
squirl033 Goldmember More info | Jan 16, 2015 15:36 | #27 great series... nice and sharp, excellent contrast and clarity! looks like that lens agrees with you! i'm still using the original version, one i bought 7 years ago. it's been a workhorse, and i've been very satisfied with its performance. not sure yet if i can justify the scratch for the new one - i think if i had that much cash to spare, i'd spend it on the 7D mk II rather than a new 100-400... but if money wasn't such a limiting factor, i'd definitely be taking a serious look at that new lens! Rocky ~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 18, 2015 22:16 | #28 Man, I had to run and get a band-aid for my eyeballs those images were so sharp. Indeed, the new 100-400 might get me to thinking about trading my a nice specimen of the EF 400/5.6 L that I own.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MedicineMan4040 The Magic Johnson of Cameras More info | Jan 19, 2015 02:15 | #29 Just found this posting. Stunning hawk imagery! flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cruso Member 190 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2008 Location: N.E.Lincs More info | Jan 19, 2015 12:46 | #30 Just stunning Canon 7d2Canon Eos 7d 500f4 is 300f2.8 24-105 IS 100-is macro 580ex11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1011 guests, 162 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||