Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 25 Dec 2014 (Thursday) 14:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

AdobeRGB1998 or ProPhotoRGB?

 
CameraFiend
Member
32 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2014
Post edited over 8 years ago by CameraFiend.
     
Jan 07, 2015 21:28 as a reply to  @ post 17371602 |  #31

Yes, I'm thinking of switching to Capture One as well. Probably after Lightroom 5 expires when they release Lighteoom 6.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,453 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4542
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 8 years ago by Wilt. (2 edits in all)
     
Jan 08, 2015 00:35 |  #32

Alveric wrote in post #17371602 (external link)
Man, reading this thread makes me even happier I ditched Lightroom for CaptureOne Pro.

I work in AdobeRGB from camera until final output, then I convert to CMYK or sRGB depending on the destination.

You apparently do not understand the flaws in color reproduction which are caused by working in aRGB and then converting to sRGB.

Think about this for a while...If both aRGB and sRGB both have 16.7 million VALUES assigned to hues, and there are hues in aRGB which are not in sRGB...


  1. it is obvious that there are gaps in the hues which are in aRGB while absent from sRGB,
  2. but just as important what about the hues which are in sRGB but necessarily absent from aRGB (due to the reassigments of some of the values, to represent the additional hues in aRGB)?!


The ONLY way to do it without losses is to store in a 16-bit per color database, and THEN convert to a simply 8-bit per color space (aRGB/sRGB).

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Jan 08, 2015 00:55 |  #33

@ BigAl007: Adobe Lightroom is actually unusual in that it only offers one colour space for internal working; known as MelissaRGB, it's a variant of ProPhotoRGB with a different Gamma curve.

Correction: The internal space is called Linear ProPhoto RGB because its TRC is gamma 1.0. Melissa RGB is the display space, ProPhoto with the sRGB TRC.

@CameraFiend: What was Adobe's point of changing the Gamma of the ProPhotoRGB in Lightroom? Why didn't they use the native gamma of ProPhotoRGB when they programmed the software?

It is because the Raw capture data is linear. Keeping the data linear makes every calculation more accurate, easier, faster, and more flexible. Applying ProPhoto's 1.8 gamma would introduce quantization errors early on that would become amplified further down the work stream.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon_Shoe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,311 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 550
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Kihei, HI
     
Jan 08, 2015 01:17 as a reply to  @ CameraFiend's post |  #34

I've been wanting to check it out myself and see what it's all about. I use a custom camera profile though with LR that is accurate and I'd most likely lose that with Capture One I'm guessing. Might still be a way to integrate one into it I suppose


Facebook-- http://www.facebook.co​m/AndrewShoemakerPhoto​graphy (external link)
Website----http://andrewshoemaker​photography.com/ (external link)
Nikon D810, Nikon 14-24, Nikon 24-70 F/2.8 VR, Nikon 70-200 VR II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Jan 08, 2015 05:35 |  #35

CameraFiend wrote in post #17371199 (external link)
ProPhotoRGB with a 16-bit color space? I am convinced that this is the best option

You're making a BIG mistake. Don't do this.


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ejenner
Goldmember
Avatar
3,867 posts
Gallery: 98 photos
Likes: 1136
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Denver, CO
Post edited over 8 years ago by ejenner. (2 edits in all)
     
Jan 09, 2015 18:08 |  #36

I keep going back and fourth on this (or at least what my default should be). It probably depends a lot on what you shoot too.

I must admit though, I've not noticed a lack of color detail when processing a photo in ProPhoto that would have been better done in sRGB.

EDIT: So of course the day after I write that, I had exactly that experience. Processed raw, output in ProPhoto instead of sRGB (by accident) and it was not good.


Edward Jenner
5DIV, M6, GX1 II, Sig15mm FE, 16-35 F4,TS-E 17, TS-E 24, 35 f2 IS, M11-22, M18-150 ,24-105, T45 1.8VC, 70-200 f4 IS, 70-200 2.8 vII, Sig 85 1.4, 100L, 135L, 400DOII.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/48305795@N03/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/edward.jenner.372/p​hotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,303 views & 3 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it and it is followed by 6 members.
AdobeRGB1998 or ProPhotoRGB?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1152 guests, 164 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.