Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 29 Dec 2014 (Monday) 10:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Yongnuo 622s vs Canon RT

 
TLN
Senior Member
284 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2009
     
Dec 29, 2014 10:33 |  #1

Hi all.

I've recently sold my Canon 430ex2 flash, and the only flash equpment I have is two YN-622C.

I'm thnking about a two-three flashes capable of HSS and TTL.

At the moment I can:
1. Grab a 622C-TX controller and cheapest TTL/HSS flashes(YN500?) - easiest solution. If I need to add another flash I need to get a 622transiever and flash.
2. Or sell my 622s' and get into canon rt system. Obviously get a YN-ST-E3 from Yongnuo and YN-600RT flashes. Cons are: I don't need extra transievers, I can use someone's else canon RT flashes. On the other side is price. YN-600RT cost more thne YN-500 and 622, but not too much.

I know about five groups instead of three. I know that distance might be different.

I wonder if there's anything else I'm missing? Should I pay more for Yongnuo RT system?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Dec 29, 2014 13:56 |  #2

The YN-622C is a radio trigger system for the older Canon IR based ETTL system.
The YNSE3 and YN 600RT is their version of the newer Canon 600EX-RT ETTL system.
There are significant advantages to the newer technology. So, the first question you have to answer is whether you want to continue to invest in the older technology or invest in the newer technology.

Once that question is answered, the product choices are relatively straight forward.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TLN
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
284 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2009
     
Dec 29, 2014 14:16 |  #3

Well, I know where 622 came from. And I know that RT is newer system.

But older 622 tech still doing it well for me:
622 TX have same Gr mode with ETTL correction for each group(ABC), can do a proportion between A:B and so on.

As both system will do the job, I really wanna see those advantages from a newer technology.

What advantages I can see:
-$50 more for each flash =)
-but YN-600RT are more powerful then YN-500
-Can borrow friends' 600RT and use it. (None of my friends have one, but anyways)
-5 groups instead of 3.
-No need in transiever.

Possible drawback of RT:
I can spend a $35 for extra 622 and be able to borrow any flash from my friends.

May be I'm missing something?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
draderusa
Senior Member
Avatar
317 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2012
Location: Missouri, US
     
Dec 29, 2014 14:17 |  #4

The YN622C-TX is apparently in the middle of a design upgrade to address limited range issues:

lianggc wrote in post #17351025 (external link)
For those who purchased YN622C recently, we have added a YN560 mode to YN622C transceiver.

To enter this mode, hold down CH button and turn the device on. Then YN622C can receive commands from YN560-TX and update/trig the flash on it. The color of status LED is orange to indicate that YN560 mode is on.


And, we improved the PCB design of YN622C-TX and believe that it's as good as YN622C now.

If you opt to go that route you may want to wait until the old stock is depleted to ensure you receive the "improved" model with the new printed circuit board design. Mine has very limited range compared to my traditional 622C transceivers or my RT transmitter.


Dave
EOS 7D Mark II, EOS T4i -- EFS 18-135 STM, EFS 10-22 USM, EF 40 f2.8 STM, EF 50 f1.4, 600EX-RT (3), YN-E3-RT, AD-360, FT16 (2), YN560II, YN622C (4), YN622C-TX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TLN
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
284 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2009
     
Dec 29, 2014 14:22 |  #5

draderusa wrote in post #17356098 (external link)
The YN622C-TX is apparently in the middle of a design upgrade to address limited range issues:

If you opt to go that route you may want to wait until the old stock is depleted to ensure you receive the "improved" model with the new printed circuit board design. Mine has very limited range compared to my traditional 622C transceivers or my RT transmitter.

Yea, I read about it.

Is it an issue to you? I believe it can do 15-20 meters, I don't remember I ever need more then that.

RT system doesn't have such issues?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GeeMack
Senior Member
Avatar
778 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
     
Dec 29, 2014 16:14 |  #6

I have 3 speedlights based on the 622 system and if I were starting over, I'd go with the 600 system. I don't like the additional height added by the 622 and extra connection. The added height makes some modifiers difficult to use as they are usually designed for the height of the speedlight alone. Plus with the 600 system there are fewer 'parts and pieces' to store in my bag and lug around which means fewer batteries too.


7D, 50 f1.8, 17-55 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 II, 100-400 f4.5-5.6L, 2x TC III, 580EX II, 430EX, 568EX II, 622C
glmphotos.zenfolio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mdrtoys
Senior Member
842 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 141
Joined Apr 2007
     
Dec 29, 2014 17:55 |  #7

I have 2 Canon 600's and 2 Yongnuo YN600EX-RT - they work exactly the same. Besides the Yongs being a free rotation system vs the push button of the canons, I can't tell the difference.

I would pay more and get the RT's, they are worth it




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gremlin75
Goldmember
Avatar
2,738 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 226
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
Post edited over 8 years ago by gremlin75.
     
Dec 29, 2014 19:22 |  #8

TLN wrote in post #17356104 (external link)
Yea, I read about it.

Is it an issue to you? I believe it can do 15-20 meters, I don't remember I ever need more then that.

RT system doesn't have such issues?

My 622-tx does a little over 30 feet (about 10 meters) definitely not 30 meters. So far it's not an issue to me but I'm really hoping it doesn't become one.

I have not heard of the rt system showing the same limited range issues as the 622-tx.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
inkista
Senior Member
Avatar
700 posts
Likes: 95
Joined Oct 2007
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
     
Dec 30, 2014 15:47 |  #9

Were you planning on adding a studio strobe? is probably another question to ask yourself. Dead easy to add one in the 622 eco system; maybe not so much with RT at the moment (unless you like dumb optical slaving).


I'm a woman. I shoot with a Fuji X100T, Panasonic GX-7, Canon 5DmkII, and 50D. flickr stream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kaitlyn2004
Goldmember
1,694 posts
Likes: 204
Joined Oct 2009
     
Dec 30, 2014 23:37 |  #10

inkista wrote in post #17357899 (external link)
Were you planning on adding a studio strobe? is probably another question to ask yourself. Dead easy to add one in the 622 eco system; maybe not so much with RT at the moment (unless you like dumb optical slaving).

I guess nothing exists now (???) but surely Yongnuo will just make a 600-compatible receiver, won't they?


My Landscape Photography Videos (external link)
My Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
draderusa
Senior Member
Avatar
317 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2012
Location: Missouri, US
     
Jan 01, 2015 20:15 as a reply to  @ TLN's post |  #11

My YN622C-TX has a reliable unobstructed range of about 25 to 30 feet. It certainly is an issue. The same issue is not present in the traditional YN622 transceiver units or in my RT equipment.


Dave
EOS 7D Mark II, EOS T4i -- EFS 18-135 STM, EFS 10-22 USM, EF 40 f2.8 STM, EF 50 f1.4, 600EX-RT (3), YN-E3-RT, AD-360, FT16 (2), YN560II, YN622C (4), YN622C-TX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CliveyBoy
R.I.P.      He will be missed
Avatar
3,272 posts
Likes: 42
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Tauranga, NZ
Post edited over 8 years ago by CliveyBoy with reason 'Added'.
     
Jan 02, 2015 03:02 as a reply to  @ draderusa's post |  #12

My tests indicate 20M/66ft max range with the YN622C-TX, in the open.

The design engineer says that the C-TX circuit board has been re-designed, and now matches the 622C range. See https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=17351025

I have ordered one of the new units through the OFFICIAL YN eBay shop, and am eagerly looking forward to it arriving for testing!

PS It's a hardware issue, not a firmware one. :-(


Clive, and Great G/D Abbie
50D; 580EXII, 430EXII, 550EX, YN685EX; YN-622C II, YN622C-TX and YN560-TX controllers TOYUG II v5.10 YN622 System Guide (external link)
I tried retiring, but gave it up - it's a dead end

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
Post edited over 8 years ago by Left Handed Brisket.
     
Jan 02, 2015 06:41 |  #13

inkista wrote in post #17357899 (external link)
Were you planning on adding a studio strobe? is probably another question to ask yourself. Dead easy to add one in the 622 eco system; maybe not so much with RT at the moment (unless you like dumb optical slaving).

this is exactly what i was thinking.

the hassle of dealing with adding a receiver (and additional batteries) to a flash is offset by being able to fire my CL-360 and potentially any other 'non-RT' speedlight or strobe.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
draderusa
Senior Member
Avatar
317 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2012
Location: Missouri, US
     
Jan 02, 2015 11:32 as a reply to  @ Left Handed Brisket's post |  #14

+1 This is the reason I am currently using both 622 and RT transmitters depending on the flash units I'm using. If someone develops an RT compatible receiver I'll switch over to exclusive RT. Until that occurs I'll continue to use the older 622 system when mixing my 600's with other equipment.


Dave
EOS 7D Mark II, EOS T4i -- EFS 18-135 STM, EFS 10-22 USM, EF 40 f2.8 STM, EF 50 f1.4, 600EX-RT (3), YN-E3-RT, AD-360, FT16 (2), YN560II, YN622C (4), YN622C-TX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,305 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Yongnuo 622s vs Canon RT
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is bzguy
1578 guests, 195 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.