Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Marketplace & Market Info Market Watch 
Thread started 31 Dec 2014 (Wednesday) 08:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Why have Zeiss 21mm ZE used prices dropped?

 
TaDa
...as cool as Perry
Avatar
6,742 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: New York
     
Dec 31, 2014 08:58 |  #1

Just wondering why the used prices on this lens have dropped by $400+ in the last couple years. There's no new model, the new price hasn't dropped, etc.

Just wondering why they're going for $1k on eBay when they were $1500 not too long ago.


Name is Peter and here is my gear:
Canon 5D II, Canon 7D, Canon 40D
Glass - Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE, Canon 35 f/1.4L, Canon 40 f/2.8 STM, Canon 24-70 f/2.8
L, Canon 85 f/1.2L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 500 f/4L IS
Speedlite 580ex II, 430ex - Gitzo GT-3541XLS w/ Arca B1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
howiewu
Senior Member
Avatar
629 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Feb 2011
     
Dec 31, 2014 09:21 |  #2

Maybe because people realized the Canon 16-35 f/4 IS is just as good?


5DII, 70D
17-40mm f/4 USM L, 24-70mm f/4 IS USM L, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 IS USM L, 24mm f/3.5 TS-E L, 35mm f/2, 50mm f/1.4 USM, 100mm f/2.8 IS USM L, 300mm f/2.8 IS USM II L, 430 EX II, 270 EX II, 1.4x TC III, 2x TC III, Kenko Pro 300 1.4x TC
Home Page: http://www.travelerath​ome.com (external link), Blog: http://travelerathome.​wordpress.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NWPhil
Senior Member
445 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 88
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Oregon
     
Dec 31, 2014 09:23 |  #3

my take (and many other people) is the new 16-35 f/4.
http://www.dpreview.co​m/forums/thread/369993​5?page=2 (external link)
the zoom adds more convenience, and the IS compensates the lower aperture for handheld shots.
Also the new zoom has less coma effect than previous version, and probably closer to the zeiss.
With that said, I have both, but hard pressed to sell the zeiss - would faster sell the 16-35 if canon would release a 11-24 or similar
Yes, the value is dropping mre than I ilke to see, and even worst with the 50MP, but both will keep value in the longggger run.
Besides, zeiss is ahead in manual focusing precision - some will regreat they are selling it, others not so much. It's all a trade off


NWPhil
Editing Image OK
GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TaDa
THREAD ­ STARTER
...as cool as Perry
Avatar
6,742 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: New York
     
Dec 31, 2014 12:16 |  #4

Same thing happened when the 24II hit, but then the Zeiss came back because of its unique rendering. I guess we shall see what happens.


Name is Peter and here is my gear:
Canon 5D II, Canon 7D, Canon 40D
Glass - Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE, Canon 35 f/1.4L, Canon 40 f/2.8 STM, Canon 24-70 f/2.8
L, Canon 85 f/1.2L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 500 f/4L IS
Speedlite 580ex II, 430ex - Gitzo GT-3541XLS w/ Arca B1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dog ­ rocket
Senior Member
931 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Northern California Sierra Foothills
     
Dec 31, 2014 14:30 |  #5

This is apples to oranges:

Zoom vs Fixed Length
IS vs None
Slowish vs Fastish
OEM Singular Mount vs Multiple Mount 3rd Party
AF vs MF (I know you can MF an AF lens, but it's not the same)
Mass Construction vs Craft Construction

This is an unbiased and factual list. I don't have a personal preference and I have both Canon and Zeiss lenses.
So, assuming identical IQ, there's still a world of difference and I'm not sure they are in the same market except that they can both do 21mm. :)


Randy...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perry ­ Ge
Batteries? We don't need no...   . . . or cards.
Avatar
12,266 posts
Gallery: 83 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 298
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Hong Kong
     
Jan 03, 2015 08:58 |  #6

WHAT?!?! This is news to me. Must keep an eye out for these mythical cheap Distagons.


Perry | www.perryge.com (external link) | flickr (external link) | C&C always welcome | Market Feedback & Gear | Sharpening sticky | Perspective sticky

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TaDa
THREAD ­ STARTER
...as cool as Perry
Avatar
6,742 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: New York
     
Jan 04, 2015 08:44 |  #7

PERRY! Yeah, I've seen them selling for $1k


Name is Peter and here is my gear:
Canon 5D II, Canon 7D, Canon 40D
Glass - Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE, Canon 35 f/1.4L, Canon 40 f/2.8 STM, Canon 24-70 f/2.8
L, Canon 85 f/1.2L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 500 f/4L IS
Speedlite 580ex II, 430ex - Gitzo GT-3541XLS w/ Arca B1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
howiewu
Senior Member
Avatar
629 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Feb 2011
     
Jan 04, 2015 11:51 |  #8

dog rocket wrote in post #17359372 (external link)
This is apples to oranges:

Zoom vs Fixed Length
IS vs None
Slowish vs Fastish
OEM Singular Mount vs Multiple Mount 3rd Party
AF vs MF (I know you can MF an AF lens, but it's not the same)
Mass Construction vs Craft Construction

This is an unbiased and factual list. I don't have a personal preference and I have both Canon and Zeiss lenses.
So, assuming identical IQ, there's still a world of difference and I'm not sure they are in the same market except that they can both do 21mm. :)

If these matter to you, more power to you.

But the only substantive advantage of the Zeiss is the large aperture. But for landscape use, that advantage is even dubious. In terms of image quality, if you look at the samples, the mystical Zeiss quality is purely, well, mystical. The other mabufactureres' high grade lenses (Canon, Nikon, even Sigma) are just as good.


5DII, 70D
17-40mm f/4 USM L, 24-70mm f/4 IS USM L, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 IS USM L, 24mm f/3.5 TS-E L, 35mm f/2, 50mm f/1.4 USM, 100mm f/2.8 IS USM L, 300mm f/2.8 IS USM II L, 430 EX II, 270 EX II, 1.4x TC III, 2x TC III, Kenko Pro 300 1.4x TC
Home Page: http://www.travelerath​ome.com (external link), Blog: http://travelerathome.​wordpress.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dog ­ rocket
Senior Member
931 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Northern California Sierra Foothills
Post edited over 8 years ago by dog rocket. (2 edits in all)
     
Jan 05, 2015 15:13 |  #9

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

I knew someone would try to turn that into a pissing match which is why my post was completely unbiased. How do you know which one I prefer when I have neither?


Randy...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dog ­ rocket
Senior Member
931 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Northern California Sierra Foothills
Post edited over 8 years ago by dog rocket.
     
Jan 05, 2015 15:26 |  #10

By the way, did you mean mystical or mythical? By calling the Zeiss mystical, you've just given it your highest endorsement. I think you meant to refer to it as ordinary. Either way, I'd have to disagree (I had the ZE21 for awhile).

IQ wasn't on the comparison I drew up because, like I said earlier, I have, use and like both Canon and Zeiss lenses and I'm sure the analytical difference between them is minimal at their high quality level.. However, if you feel that there's no difference in the drawing styles of lenses then just crap yourself up with kit lenses and be done with it.


Randy...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scokar
Goldmember
Avatar
1,080 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
     
Jan 05, 2015 19:04 |  #11

NWPhil wrote in post #17358898 (external link)
...
Also the new zoom has less coma effect than previous version, and probably closer to the zeiss.
...

A definite benefit for any lens! :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perry ­ Ge
Batteries? We don't need no...   . . . or cards.
Avatar
12,266 posts
Gallery: 83 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 298
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Hong Kong
     
Jan 10, 2015 06:39 |  #12

Corner sharpness, flare control and lack of barrel distortion all matter for landscapes. I dunno about the Canon 16-35 f/4 because I've never owned or used one, but I rented the 21 ZE Distagon once and it SMOKED my 17-40L and 24-105L. Wasn't even close. Made the 17-40L look like a kit lens (granted that lens' IQ isn't that great to begin with).

Let's see some corner crops to convince us otherwise.


Perry | www.perryge.com (external link) | flickr (external link) | C&C always welcome | Market Feedback & Gear | Sharpening sticky | Perspective sticky

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MDJAK
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
24,745 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 204
Joined Nov 2004
Location: New York
     
Jan 13, 2015 08:26 |  #13

I think people just don't want your used gear, Peter. ;-)a :p




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TaDa
THREAD ­ STARTER
...as cool as Perry
Avatar
6,742 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: New York
     
Jan 13, 2015 14:16 |  #14

well, I'm no longer looking to sell it, so Nyah!


Name is Peter and here is my gear:
Canon 5D II, Canon 7D, Canon 40D
Glass - Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE, Canon 35 f/1.4L, Canon 40 f/2.8 STM, Canon 24-70 f/2.8
L, Canon 85 f/1.2L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 500 f/4L IS
Speedlite 580ex II, 430ex - Gitzo GT-3541XLS w/ Arca B1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,184 views & 2 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Why have Zeiss 21mm ZE used prices dropped?
FORUMS Marketplace & Market Info Market Watch 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1024 guests, 107 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.