Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 05 Jan 2015 (Monday) 09:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Overcoming Mixed Lighting

 
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
Jan 05, 2015 09:26 |  #1

Here's a photo from a wedding I shot in Nov.; beofre the ceremony, I used my Expodisc to get custom white balance shots for the processional. Great, until the actual processional & they had the entrance doors to the church open during the whole thing. So instead of just dealing with the tungsten lighting inside the church, I was shooting the processional with the ambient light behind them. As you can see, this created a very blue back drop. How would you have handled this (assuming you'd have known that door would be open)? Oh & to throw one more monkey wrench in, assume the church doesn't allow flash....go!

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/01/1/LQ_706376.jpg
Image hosted by forum (706376) © Michelle Brooks Photography [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,913 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14872
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jan 05, 2015 09:48 |  #2

You can only have one correct white balance, so you did the right thing. The light falling on the subject is the modt important. Its not as if you could find a white balance halfway between the two sources, then you have two bad colors. But you can fix it in post if you shoot raw. Just mask in the corrected wb in photoshop or use an adjustment brush in lightroom.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Jan 05, 2015 09:50 |  #3

gonzogolf wrote in post #17367166 (external link)
You can only have one correct white balance, so you did the right thing. The light falling on the subject is the modt important. Its not as if you could find a white balance halfway between the two sources, then you have two bad colors. But you can fix it in post if you shoot raw. Just mask in the corrected wb in photoshop or use an adjustment brush in lightroom.

+ 1 for the adjustment brush in Lightroom. Very useful tool for this kind of situation.


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
insufferably pedantic. I can live with that.
Avatar
24,834 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 16185
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Jan 05, 2015 13:57 |  #4

What bothers me more than the quality of the light in your sample is the distribution of light. People are too dark, view through open door is too light and thus dominates the people.


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa | Comments welcome

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcolman
Goldmember
2,666 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 694
Joined Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
Post edited over 8 years ago by jcolman.
     
Jan 05, 2015 14:42 |  #5

^^this^^. Next time go for the correct exposure on the people and let the background blow out. You can't always control your environment so the best plan is to make sure the people are exposed properly.


www.jimcolmanphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4201
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
Post edited over 8 years ago by umphotography.
     
Jan 05, 2015 15:04 |  #6

Its why we shoot in Raw Michelle. Easy fix in post. As Jim and Nqjudo mentioned, get exposure and color correct for the subjects, Brush back the background and you can brush in WB corrections with LR for BG as well. Sucks when this happens and I Hate that when it happens. Wont be the first time and guarantee you it wont be the last either.


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
Jan 05, 2015 17:14 as a reply to  @ OhLook's post |  #7

True, it is underexposed for the subjects, but I tend to shoot a bit darker, I don't like to over expose. That's not too hard to correct in post processing tho, of course, in camera is best :-)


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
Jan 05, 2015 17:16 |  #8

Ok, guys, thanks so much! Next time I will go for getting better exposure on the subjects & not worry about that background :-) I did use the adjustment brush in ACR which works great, I just got bored with having to do it on every one of those processional shots.


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sanborn281
Member
Avatar
81 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 11
Joined Dec 2014
Location: Colonial Beach VA
     
Jan 05, 2015 21:10 |  #9

Michelle Brooks Photography wrote in post #17367818 (external link)
True, it is underexposed for the subjects, but I tend to shoot a bit darker, I don't like to over expose. That's not too hard to correct in post processing tho, of course, in camera is best :-)

Wouldnt over exposing be more to ETTR and have less noise when you pp?


My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,913 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14872
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jan 05, 2015 21:13 |  #10

I know this thread is about post, but ive never run into a church thst wouldnt allow flash for the processional. The ceremony sure, but not going in or out.,




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
memoriesoftomorrow
Goldmember
3,846 posts
Likes: 293
Joined Nov 2010
     
Jan 05, 2015 23:34 |  #11

gonzogolf wrote in post #17368198 (external link)
I know this thread is about post, but ive never run into a church thst wouldnt allow flash for the processional. The ceremony sure, but not going in or out.,


Plenty over here won't let you use flash anywhere. Mainly the Catholic churches.


Peter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4201
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Jan 06, 2015 11:58 |  #12

gonzogolf wrote in post #17368198 (external link)
I know this thread is about post, but ive never run into a church thst wouldnt allow flash for the processional. The ceremony sure, but not going in or out.,

This is the answer.

The sacrament does not start until the priest opens the ceremony "in the name of the father and the son and the holy Ghost" .....This happens after the processional. So Flash is allowed to this point. The mass has officially ended go in peace is your next clue to turn the dam flash back on. Everthing else BT these 2 statements is off limits for flash photography in about 99% of catholic venues.

Do Yourself a favor and memorize this and talk to your priest before the ceremony. They will be impressed that you know this and you will have a friend up there during the ceremony

Respect the sacrament of marriage at all times- Too many photographers think its a photo op......It is not a photo op


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mystik610
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,076 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 12356
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Houston, TX
     
Jan 07, 2015 05:10 |  #13

Michelle Brooks Photography wrote in post #17367128 (external link)
Here's a photo from a wedding I shot in Nov.; beofre the ceremony, I used my Expodisc to get custom white balance shots for the processional. Great, until the actual processional & they had the entrance doors to the church open during the whole thing. So instead of just dealing with the tungsten lighting inside the church, I was shooting the processional with the ambient light behind them. As you can see, this created a very blue back drop. How would you have handled this (assuming you'd have known that door would be open)? Oh & to throw one more monkey wrench in, assume the church doesn't allow flash....go!

Provided no one is wearing blue, one trick is to set your WB to correct the tungsten lights, and to de-saturate the blue and aqua tones in photoshop and lightroom. This will shift the ambient sunlight coming through the backdoors to white. Given the contrast in the scene, without the use of a flash, you really don't have a choice but to blow out the background to get a good exposure on the subject. You can, however, push the highlights in lightroom to recover some of the detail in the highlights. Dynamic range goes a long way here!

Most of my clients are Catholic, and yes catholic churches have very strict rules when it comes to the use of flash. They're also strict about where the photographers can shoot from...particularly challenging because they don't let the photographers into the center aisle, and you're forced to frame shots from awkward angles. From a business standpoint, its a good practice to find out what the rules for the photographer are early on and to communicate them to the bride and groom. That way they're aware of your limitations, and you can manage their expectations on the front end.

If you have the time, you can always re-stage some of the key shots (like bride with her parents in the processional) after the ceremony, so you can shoot them without the limitations placed on the photographers during the actual ceremony. I often have to re-stage the first kiss, because I can never get the shot from a decent angle during the actual ceremony!


focalpointsphoto.com (external link) - flickr (external link) - Instagram (external link)
α7ʀIV - α7ʀIII
Sigma 14-24 f2.8 ART - Zeiss Loxia 21 - Sigma 35 f1.2 ART - Sony 35 1.8 - Sony/Zeiss 55 1.8 - Sony 85GM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Jan 07, 2015 12:45 |  #14

I don't have anything to add beyond what's already been said. Nonetheless, here's the short version of my thoughts:

I've never shot in a church where I was not able to use flash for the processional and recessional. Make that lighting stronger if you're working in a very mixed situation.

Even if you can't use flash, always-always-always set exposure, set WB, set everything, for the subject. Let the background go if you have to.

Thanks to LR's ability to brush in a WB adjustment, there really is no need to gel your flash. Again, shoot for the subject and paint a correction in in PP.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,617 views & 5 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Overcoming Mixed Lighting
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
815 guests, 117 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.