Ok guys. You were not kidding about this head. Great piece of quality gear that suits my needs very well. A little heavier and bigger than I had anticipated but still workable for travel.
Jan 11, 2015 22:18 | #16 Ok guys. You were not kidding about this head. Great piece of quality gear that suits my needs very well. A little heavier and bigger than I had anticipated but still workable for travel. Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PCousins Goldmember 1,758 posts Gallery: 1191 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 30549 Joined Nov 2014 Location: Weston-Super-Mare (UK) More info | Glad your pleased with your new purchase. You probably will want to get yourself a few more 410PL Quick Release plates for your other lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Inspeqtor I was hit more than 15 times More info | Jan 12, 2015 00:36 | #18 I also have the 410 Geared Head and LOVE it! I have tried Ball Heads but I hate those things! Charles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 12, 2015 21:18 | #19 As most of my stuff uses Arca type plates and clamps I just attached an Arca style clamp (pretty cheap) to the 410 plate on my Manfrotto 410 head - works just fine and saves me having to change plates all the time. Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 12, 2015 21:26 | #20 johnf3f wrote in post #17379798 As most of my stuff uses Arca type plates and clamps I just attached an Arca style clamp (pretty cheap) to the 410 plate on my Manfrotto 410 head - works just fine and saves me having to change plates all the time. There is nothing wrong with the Manfrotto 410 QR plates it's just that they won't fit on the rest of my gear! I was wondering if a similar modification was possible using the Manfrotto QR system. Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nick5 Goldmember More info | Jan 12, 2015 23:54 | #21 NQ. Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, 7D (x2) BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 13, 2015 18:43 | #22 nqjudo wrote in post #17379807 I was wondering if a similar modification was possible using the Manfrotto QR system. Which Manfrotto QR system? They do a number, 6 on the 468 head alone! Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 13, 2015 20:59 | #23 johnf3f wrote in post #17381062 Which Manfrotto QR system? They do a number, 6 on the 468 head alone! The Manfrotto 410 QR system is very good, if a little bulky, but I am not too impressed with any of the others I have tried - though I have not tried them all. I have the older 484RC2 ball head (now replaced by the 494RC2). It uses the standard RC2 plates of which I have a TON. I'd love to repurpose them. Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I wasn't too happy with the RC2 system but it depends on what you are using. My camera is quite top heavy and weighs 3 1/2 lbs before I put a lens on it! For lighter/better balanced setups the RC2 is probably fine. Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 14, 2015 17:34 | #25 johnf3f wrote in post #17382558 I wasn't too happy with the RC2 system but it depends on what you are using. My camera is quite top heavy and weighs 3 1/2 lbs before I put a lens on it! For lighter/better balanced setups the RC2 is probably fine. Manfrotto do make a separate clamp that takes your plates and can be attached to the 410 QR plate on the 410 Geared head - I used to use to do this myself. Below is a UK listing for it. https://www.calphoto.co.uk …r-with-3157n-plate/MN323/ Thanks very much for that. I'm going to give it a try to see how it works out. I didn't mind the RC2 for my 5D3 as much as I found the ball head insufficient. I have a few smaller bodies that I think will work much better with the RC2 than the Manfrotto plate. Still can't complain about this head though! Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 14, 2015 17:50 | #26 Forgot to say that there are a lot of copies on Flea Bay, such as this one: Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 14, 2015 19:01 | #27 johnf3f wrote in post #17382639 Forgot to say that there are a lot of copies on Flea Bay, such as this one: http://www.ebay.co.uk …ain_3&hash=item3ceecbc7c5 Or this one: http://www.ebay.co.uk …ain_3&hash=item3a9eed64ca Mine is an original Manfrotto but the 2 above look OK and may be worth a try?
Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb
LOG IN TO REPLY |
You probably won't have any issues with the RC2 system, it's just that I find the Arca system more to my liking. Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 19, 2020 18:22 | #29 reviving this old thread as I've only just now become aware of these types of heads.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Inspeqtor I was hit more than 15 times More info Post edited over 2 years ago by Inspeqtor. (2 edits in all) | Dec 19, 2020 23:19 | #30 Inspeqtor wrote in post #17378238 I also have the 410 Geared Head and LOVE it! I have tried Ball Heads but I hate those things! Give me a geared head any day!!!!!!!! ![]() goalerjones wrote in post #19169141 reviving this old thread as I've only just now become aware of these types of heads. My recent work getting Jupiter/Saturn images has made me hate my traditional ball head. Doing the "anticipated drift" method of framing a shot takes forever. Is the 410 mini still a good geared head for the price or is there a better sub-$300 geared head I should be looking at? I still use my 410 for every Moon shot or Jupiter/Saturn shot I can do. Lately the weather being typical Indiana winter weather I see more clouds than I do clear skies. Friday it was clear in the morning! YAY!!! But it was cloudy before sunset. Might have clear skies on Tuesday. Charles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1261 guests, 115 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||