Fujifilm X-T1 • Fujifilm Fujinon 16-55mm f/2.8 @28mm • 1/60 • f/4.5 • ISO 200
Mar 17, 2016 20:33 | #646 Fuji X....BAAAAM! Renders way different than Sony.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dalibort82 Goldmember  More info | Mar 18, 2016 08:31 | #647 |
windpig Chopped liver  More info | Mar 18, 2016 16:48 | #648 Beauty Would you like to buy a vowel?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 18, 2016 18:44 | #649 Fujifilm cameras and lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 19, 2016 03:10 | #650 I haven't been on these forums in ages, lots to catch up on!   Fuji 100-400 by JJ, on Flickr100% crop:  Fuji 100-400 by JJ, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 19, 2016 06:09 | #651 Just a few snaps from a walk about with the little 'un. Using the X-T1 and XF-90.      Processing is one of the VSCO B&W filters, so grain is intentional.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 19, 2016 09:48 | #652 jj_glos wrote in post #17940410 I haven't been on these forums in ages, lots to catch up on! Picked up the 100-400, not had much time to use it but it seems a solid enough lens. Quick test shot: Fuji 100-400 by JJ, on Flickr100% crop: Fuji 100-400 by JJ, on FlickrLooking forward to seeing more with this lens and get your opinion on AF speed and accuracy with the X-T1. Fuji X....BAAAAM! Renders way different than Sony.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 19, 2016 20:59 | #653   Fuji X....BAAAAM! Renders way different than Sony.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dalibort82 Goldmember More info | Mar 20, 2016 12:29 | #654 |
Mar 20, 2016 16:18 | #655 Out for a walk this afternoon, took the 100-400. The Robin shot is with the 1.4x TC wide open at f8 560mm 1/200 and again handheld. First shot is the full frame and the second a crop of the same:  Robin by JJ, on Flickr Robin crop by JJ, on FlickrAF is pretty snappy as far as I am concerned. Blackbirds are pretty twitchy but grabbed this quickly with the smallest AF point size in single shot AF, same settings as the Robin shot except higher ISO:  Blackbird by JJ, on FlickrI tried to go for some BIF shots... Now I have an admission to make, I thought I had updated the body to the 4.3 firmware but it was still on 4.0, oops. The big takeaway for me though, is that the viewfinder "blackout" makes BIF a complete nightmare! I persevere with the blackout with motorsports and I'll be trying aircraft, but for BIF I really struggled. I freely admit to not being great at BIF in the first place though! This was about my best effort, and it's not that sharp really but that's likely due to my failings more than anything else. I'll be updating the firmware and trying again for sure.  Gull by JJ, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dalibort82 Goldmember More info | Mar 20, 2016 16:46 | #656 |
Mar 20, 2016 19:12 | #657 jj_glos wrote in post #17942143 Out for a walk this afternoon, took the 100-400. The Robin shot is with the 1.4x TC wide open at f8 560mm 1/200 and again handheld. First shot is the full frame and the second a crop of the same: Robin by JJ, on Flickr Robin crop by JJ, on FlickrAF is pretty snappy as far as I am concerned. Blackbirds are pretty twitchy but grabbed this quickly with the smallest AF point size in single shot AF, same settings as the Robin shot except higher ISO: Blackbird by JJ, on FlickrI tried to go for some BIF shots... Now I have an admission to make, I thought I had updated the body to the 4.3 firmware but it was still on 4.0, oops. The big takeaway for me though, is that the viewfinder "blackout" makes BIF a complete nightmare! I persevere with the blackout with motorsports and I'll be trying aircraft, but for BIF I really struggled. I freely admit to not being great at BIF in the first place though! This was about my best effort, and it's not that sharp really but that's likely due to my failings more than anything else. I'll be updating the firmware and trying again for sure. Gull by JJ, on FlickrLooks promising. I can't say that my 400L 5.6 and 1.4 TC would be any better for the static bird shots. Thanks for sharing. Fuji X....BAAAAM! Renders way different than Sony.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 20, 2016 19:12 | #658 Your images are always great, but this is one of my favorites. Fuji X....BAAAAM! Renders way different than Sony.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dalibort82 Goldmember More info Post edited over 7 years ago by dalibort82. | Mar 21, 2016 11:59 | #659 |
Mar 21, 2016 13:42 | #660 A quick shot taken near a window with a weak flash fill.  Image hosted by forum (782608) © mrgooch [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1831 guests, 114 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
