--
evilenglishman Goldmember 1,184 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2003 More info | Jul 23, 2003 16:01 | #1 |
Jul 23, 2003 16:10 | #2 |
daveh Senior Member 318 posts Joined Apr 2003 More info | Jul 23, 2003 16:20 | #3 Do you mean that exposure compensation is a little odd in manual?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 23, 2003 16:21 | #4 |
daveh Senior Member 318 posts Joined Apr 2003 More info | Jul 23, 2003 16:24 | #5 As far as I know it's not possible. (Never tried either though - the whole idea of overriding my own setting seems a little goofy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jeppe Member 145 posts Joined Feb 2003 More info | Jul 23, 2003 17:40 | #6 No, that is not possible to compensate in M-mode, but they may refer to it as the pictures was underexposed by 2/3. Now that i find to be strange since its a pretty white scene and therefore with an -2/3 the white wouldnt be that white, it should be more like grey than white.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GuillermoFreige Senior Member 704 posts Joined Jun 2003 Location: La Plata, Argentina More info | Jul 23, 2003 18:02 | #7 Yes, is a mistake. I've checked this particular RAW file with Canon Viewer and BreezeBrowser, and I can't find the -2/3 EV value anywhere. Probably they've copied the table from another picture, and forgot to delete the EV data. Exposure info is OK. Guillermo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 24, 2003 07:27 | #8 |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1879 guests, 106 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||