The wife wants something to replace her Sony H70 because she is frustrated with it. She is pretty much an auto settings shooter, but will turn her flash off when necessary. She is not interested in stepping up to a DSLR, but:
-wants something that is easily portable, smaller the better
-wants faster AF than she is getting now
-wants better IQ, especially in high ISO situations
-wants decent video quality, and hates that my 6D doesn't AF in video mode. And yes, we do have a dedicated vid cam but it is a non-factor.
The 5100 is pretty cheap lightly used, and it looks like you get a lot of camera for the money. I have access to a 16 2.8 pancake, which isn't exactly Zeiss glass but I didn't find it to be bad when using it with the NEX C3. It seems like this combo could be a decent solution for the money. I'm not looking to spend anything over $400 here. I've considered an RX-100, but It seems like the 5100 would trump it for everything but portability . . . can anyone chime in on the AF speed/shutter lag of the 100 vs the 5100?
While being my backup body wouldn't be the 5100's primary use, I do feel I would get some use out of it like this if I were to get an adapter for my EOS glass.
Thanks in advance for your input.

