Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Food Photography & Visual Recipes 
Thread started 14 Jan 2015 (Wednesday) 08:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Critique

 
triplethreat
Hatchling
Avatar
7 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Hanover, PA
     
Jan 14, 2015 08:03 |  #1

Well this is my first post since the new update. Still getting used to it. I used to post a lot a few years ago but am just getting back into it.

My wife has started a food blog and i have been chosen to take the photos. :-)

This was taken with a Canon EF100mm F2.8L Macro.

ISO 400
F14
Exposure .5sec.

I did some adjusting in Lightroom. This was shot in JPEG but, i have since switched to RAW

Thanks for your help!


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Canon T2i// Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro// Canon Nifty Fifty// Sigma 18-125 HSM// Canon 430EXII
theshortordercook.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
Spiderwoman
Avatar
16,701 posts
Gallery: 70 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3745
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Jan 14, 2015 09:56 |  #2

At that size, it's overwhelming. I the viewer seem to be much closer to the food than I would be in reality. This effect, the feeling of being too close, is due to the small area shown, the high angle of view, and the composition using few areas of color (only three, and in each of them one color predominates). I think you tried too hard to get detail at the expense of other elements. Why use macro for this kind of subject?

The white balance also needs attention: pasta quite yellow, dish and cloth somewhat too blue.


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa, more so (2 wds.), shoo-in | IMAGE EDITING OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
triplethreat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Avatar
7 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Hanover, PA
     
Jan 14, 2015 10:15 as a reply to  @ OhLook's post |  #3

It does seem to be bigger than life. I guess in this instance i was going for the detail. I typically use one of two lenses either the 100 macro or the 50mm for a wider shot.

I have just started taking this photos for the blog and am definitely learning as I go. I like the white background but, it could use some color to break it up I think. I agree the composition does need some work.

We use the macro simply for the detail.


Canon T2i// Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro// Canon Nifty Fifty// Sigma 18-125 HSM// Canon 430EXII
theshortordercook.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lupo-Lobo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,103 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 417
Joined Nov 2013
Location: Texas
     
Jan 17, 2015 13:52 |  #4

Very nice detail but to me it is a bit close. I use the 100mm f/2.8 as well and trust me you will still get plenty of detail if you pull back a bit. A little bit of parsley would have gone a long way in diversifying the color palate. That said, I still like the photo.


IMAGE: http://lupo-lobo.com/photoblog/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/2013polenta7LL-1.jpg



As an example the above image is polenta and eggs shot with the 100mm at about four feet out.

Lupo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mikelangelo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,256 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Nov 2005
Location: West Chicago, United States
     
Jan 20, 2015 19:40 |  #5

I like that your image is bright. I have trouble with sauce like this. Trying to light it softly... the harsh specular highlights are a little too much for me. But I like the overall image. I agree it might be a little close.

I'm guessing you used a flash. It seems like the whites are a little blown out... which is probably where my problem lies... softer light (i.e. big window or reflector might solve it)


--
Photoblog (external link)
7d::17-50 f/2.8::100 Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,203 views & 2 likes for this thread
Critique
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Food Photography & Visual Recipes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is phot-awe
891 guests, 379 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.