rgs wrote in post #17400446
I've thought about finding a way to mount my digital on the back of the 4x5 - until I realized how much dust might be in that bellows. The camera in the photo seems to have center tilts rather than base tilts. Many of the wooden field cameras have only base tilts, especially on the back, so every tilt requires refocusing. Center tilts are better.
One thing you rarely find on a wooden 4x5 but do find on most monorails is rear focus. It's advantage is that image size doesn't change as you focus which is great for precise close-up work.
So much for the view camera. Makes me want to dig mine out but then I would have to unbury my darkroom to load holders and process film.
I have mounted my dSLR on my LF camera!
A somewhat pointless exercise I found, because LF lenses are too long in FL to provide a reasonable angle of view on the tiny dSLR format...few LF lenses have <75mm FL, which is 'short tele' on FF dSLR. If you try to mount a dSLR lens on the LF frame, it does not have sufficient distance to the focal plane to permit any focus other than macro distances! And unfortunately my Bronica Medium Format lenses (the shortest of which is 40mm FL) which have a longer flange distance and might focus to longer distance, have leaf shutters with a very complex electromechanical mechanism to open the shutter for viewing!
So from the standpoint of tilt or shift movements, the LF camera is valueless with dSLR mounted. I should have thought this out more, before I expended the effort.
I love shifts with dSLR, using my OM 24mm shift lens with OM-EF adapter for my Canon dSLR to resolve converging vertical lines for architectural photos, but find little need for tilt movement with small formats (FF or APS-C).
(pictured on my Olympus body)