Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Official Stuff AMASS Forum Software Talk 
Thread started 21 Jan 2015 (Wednesday) 06:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Bugs in AMASS 1.1

 
this thread is locked
Pekka
El General Moderator
Avatar
17,820 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 1588
Joined Mar 2001
Location: Hellsinki, Finland
Post edited over 5 years ago by Pekka.
     
Jan 21, 2015 06:58 |  #1

Just fixed notifications, now it takes you to the first new post, not the last new post.

[EDIT] FIXED: Gallery forum dropdown has wrong photo counts.

[EDIT] NOT A BUG: Hosted photos are not included to quoting for some reason...
Hosted photos are not quoted when there are no ATTACH tags used in post. This is how it has worked from v 1.0.


Known issues:

New forums (arhictecture, tripods) are not indexed in search engine yet, I'll do that soon.


In post editor: Video Embed and Google View editors: command button text "overflows".

The "Gray Bar" notification info: clicking that does not open notifications as it should.

Android 5 (Lollipop) Chrome has some issues reported which are definitely caused by buggy OS, My Nexus 7 has not received the update yet, but the latest 4 series Android Chrome works great. Not much I can do in that area it seems.


The Forum Boss, El General Moderator
AMASS 2.1 Changelog (installed here now)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,189 posts
Likes: 178
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Jan 21, 2015 09:04 |  #2

Don't know if it's a bug or not...

When looking at forum thread listings and it contains a thread you have formerly read, it has the title of the thread and to the right the box / link that says "go to first unread."

When I click that link, it goes to first unread like it should. But when I click the thread subject title, it also goes to the first unread. When clicking the title of the thread, shouldn't it go to the top of the thread as if it had never been read?

The 1.1 upgrade? SWEEEEEEET !


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
22,247 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1574
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Jan 21, 2015 09:08 |  #3

Picture North Carolina wrote in post #17392872 (external link)
Don't know if it's a bug or not...

When looking at forum thread listings and it contains a thread you have formerly read, it has the title of the thread and to the right the box / link that says "go to first unread."

When I click that link, it goes to first unread like it should. But when I click the thread subject title, it also goes to the first unread. When clicking the title of the thread, shouldn't it go to the top of the thread as if it had never been read?

The 1.1 upgrade? SWEEEEEEET !

Not a bug, both take you to "first unseen". If you want the top of the thread, click "page 1".:-)


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,189 posts
Likes: 178
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
Post edited over 5 years ago by Picture North Carolina.
     
Jan 21, 2015 09:12 |  #4

rrblint wrote in post #17392878 (external link)
Not a bug, both take you to "first unseen". If you want the top of the thread, click "page 1".:-)

Nope, does not work.

The "page 1" link only appears after a thread has so many posts it goes to multiple pages.

On threads with only 1 page of posts, there is no "page 1" to click


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
22,247 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1574
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Jan 21, 2015 09:19 |  #5

Picture North Carolina wrote in post #17392881 (external link)
Nope, does not work.

The "page 1" link only appears after a thread has so many posts it goes to multiple pages.

On threads with only 1 page of posts, there is no "page 1" to click

Hmmm, yes I see your point. No way to get to the top of a 1 page thread other than scrolling or using "Go to the top".


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,189 posts
Likes: 178
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
Post edited over 5 years ago by Picture North Carolina.
     
Jan 21, 2015 09:28 |  #6

Correct. So if not a bug, an "overlook" in the design. On single page threads there is no way to go to the top. You have to click and scroll up.

Probably no big deal except on picture posting threads. If somebody posts a picture to look at or critique, it's always going to be the OP. If you go back to look at the pic, clicking takes you to the bottom and you have to scroll up to see the pic again.

Edit: thanks for the feedback, tho. I'm still lovin' 1.1. It's a sweet upgrade !


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Blurr ­ Cube
...a lucky id-iot that didn't get electrocuted...
Avatar
15,147 posts
Likes: 91
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Southern California
     
Jan 21, 2015 09:54 |  #7

Per AMASS 1.1 change log: Light box glasses are visible regardless of images size: if image is smaller than the window a small + is inserted to denote this.

I've found in some threads a few posts don't have the light box glasses. On this thread for instance:

https://photography-on-the.net …ad.php?t=121672​8&page=129

Is there some criteria for posted pics that don't show the glasses? -?

On Flickr (shows glasses):
https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=17364584

Posted (no glasses):
https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=17365746

On Flickr (no glasses):
https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=17366747
https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=17367005
https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=17382804


| Canon EOS Systems |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Firemike
" lingering odor "
Avatar
3,203 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 150
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan USA
     
Jan 21, 2015 09:59 |  #8

rrblint wrote in post #17392878 (external link)
Not a bug, both take you to "first unseen". If you want the top of the thread, click "page 1".:-)

If you click on the gray sidebar on a single page thread (when you end up lower in the page because of where "GO TO FIRST UNREAD POST" takes you) clicking will take you back to the top of the page.


Michael
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,189 posts
Likes: 178
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Jan 21, 2015 10:29 |  #9

Firemike wrote in post #17392962 (external link)
If you click on the gray sidebar on a single page thread (when you end up lower in the page because of where "GO TO FIRST UNREAD POST" takes you) clicking will take you back to the top of the page.

It would be easier, a lot more logical, and require less clicks if the design were as most people think it is.

When looking at a page of forum threads:
- click the thread title and it takes you to the thread (top)
- click the Go to First Uread link and you go to posts not yet read.

Clean, simple, logical.


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
you get what you get
Avatar
19,261 posts
Gallery: 74 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 7063
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Jan 21, 2015 10:34 |  #10

Picture North Carolina wrote in post #17393004 (external link)
It would be easier, a lot more logical, and require less clicks if the design were as most people think it is.

When looking at a page of forum threads:
- click the thread title and it takes you to the thread (top)
- click the Go to First Uread link and you go to posts not yet read.

Clean, simple, logical.

I agree. This hasn't changed from Version 1.0. Members commented on it then, too.


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa, more so (2 wds.), shoo-in | IMAGE EDITING OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
you get what you get
Avatar
19,261 posts
Gallery: 74 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 7063
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Jan 21, 2015 10:34 |  #11

This is an odd message.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa, more so (2 wds.), shoo-in | IMAGE EDITING OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KurtB
Member
208 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 90
Joined Jun 2006
Location: South Elgin, IL
Post edited over 5 years ago by KurtB.
     
Jan 21, 2015 13:36 |  #12

Blurr Cube wrote in post #17392949 (external link)
Per AMASS 1.1 change log: Light box glasses are visible regardless of images size: if image is smaller than the window a small + is inserted to denote this.

I've found in some threads a few posts don't have the light box glasses. On this thread for instance:

https://photography-on-the.net …ad.php?t=121672​8&page=129

Is there some criteria for posted pics that don't show the glasses? -?

On Flickr (shows glasses):
https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=17364584

Posted (no glasses):
https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=17365746

On Flickr (no glasses):
https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=17366747
https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=17367005
https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=17382804

Don't know if has already been fixed or not, but in all of the examples that you gave, I am seeing the glasses. This is full screen on a 27" monitor, so I don't think it is a size issue which is how you used to have to "trick" the glasses into appearing.

On all of the pictures throughout the site I have noticed that the glasses are all the way on the right margin of the page, so on the smaller pictures it can be harder to notice them because they are not on the right edge of the picture, but they are still there.


7Dmk2, Tokina 12-24 f/4, Canon EF-S 18-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS STM, Canon 70-200 f/4L IS, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS III, Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2, a few other cheap lenses, lots of little stuff, flashes, stands, and almost enough brains to be considered dangerous :confused:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Blurr ­ Cube
...a lucky id-iot that didn't get electrocuted...
Avatar
15,147 posts
Likes: 91
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Southern California
     
Jan 21, 2015 14:54 |  #13

KurtB wrote in post #17393301 (external link)
Don't know if has already been fixed or not, but in all of the examples that you gave, I am seeing the glasses. This is full screen on a 27" monitor, so I don't think it is a size issue which is how you used to have to "trick" the glasses into appearing.

On all of the pictures throughout the site I have noticed that the glasses are all the way on the right margin of the page, so on the smaller pictures it can be harder to notice them because they are not on the right edge of the picture, but they are still there.

On some of the pics I previously listed, if I do a reload of the page the glasses appears. On others, no glasses no matter what. If you're stating you can see them on all, then it must be something on my end. I duuno. -?


| Canon EOS Systems |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 226
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Jan 21, 2015 15:48 |  #14

Blurr Cube wrote in post #17392949 (external link)
Per AMASS 1.1 change log: Light box glasses are visible regardless of images size: if image is smaller than the window a small + is inserted to denote this.

I've found in some threads a few posts don't have the light box glasses. On this thread for instance:

https://photography-on-the.net …ad.php?t=121672​8&page=129

Is there some criteria for posted pics that don't show the glasses? -?

On Flickr (shows glasses):
https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=17364584

Posted (no glasses):
https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=17365746

On Flickr (no glasses):
https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=17366747
https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=17367005
https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=17382804


Blurr Cube wrote in post #17393393 (external link)
On some of the pics I previously listed, if I do a reload of the page the glasses appears. On others, no glasses no matter what. If you're stating you can see them on all, then it must be something on my end. I duuno. -?

I noticed in a couple of them when I looked, the pointing hand was right on top of the glasses. Might that be what you experienced?


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Blurr ­ Cube
...a lucky id-iot that didn't get electrocuted...
Avatar
15,147 posts
Likes: 91
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Southern California
Post edited over 5 years ago by Blurr Cube.
     
Jan 21, 2015 15:54 |  #15

Jon wrote in post #17393462 (external link)
I noticed in a couple of them when I looked, the pointing hand was right on top of the glasses. Might that be what you experienced?

No... the floating hand fades and the glasses may or may not be there. I reload and it shows up on some but not on others no matter how many time I reload.

I'm not sure what criteria the glasses is supposed to appear. If it is supposed to ALWAYS appears on ALL pics and I'm the only one having this issue then it might be on my end. -?

EDIT: Okay, just checked on mobile Chrome and the glasses do appear on all those pics. So, it's on my end (or particular settings/machine) only. Oh well. :rolleyes: :lol:


| Canon EOS Systems |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

24,671 views & 5 likes for this thread
Bugs in AMASS 1.1
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Official Stuff AMASS Forum Software Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is photom88
1949 guests, 260 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.