Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
Thread started 22 Jan 2015 (Thursday) 17:02
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

house fire: smoke damage?

 
magwai
Goldmember
1,094 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Guildford, UK
     
Jan 22, 2015 17:02 |  #1

So we had a medium sized house fire. Nobody hurt but lots of mess.

So do I need to worry that my cameras or lenses could have damaged by smoke? It was all in cupboards or bags so did not get fully contaminated, but it smells smokey so it must have had some exposure.

Opinions and experience appreciated.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cctvfitter
Member
Avatar
52 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 118
Joined Jan 2015
Location: Huddersfield
     
Jan 22, 2015 17:33 |  #2

If you have contents insurance, then you might as well claim for eveything.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
magwai
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,094 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Guildford, UK
     
Jan 22, 2015 17:40 |  #3

I can claim if I can provide evidence of damage. What should I look for?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cctvfitter
Member
Avatar
52 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 118
Joined Jan 2015
Location: Huddersfield
     
Jan 22, 2015 17:46 as a reply to  @ magwai's post |  #4

I suppose you ought to take it to a camera dealer and get them to give you an assessment of the damage , if there is contamination residue inside i guess they will probably write it off.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkyBaby
Goldmember
1,206 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 17
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Tehachapi, CA
     
Jan 22, 2015 17:57 |  #5

Yikes! I'm glad no one is hurt! Stuff is replaceable, but your family isn't. There could be heat damage to the components within the cameras and lenses. In big fires, I hear you can feel the heat from even several feet away, so I guess it would depend on far away your gear was from the fire. I think that idea of claiming sounds like the way to go. I hope the damage to your home is reparable and that its finished quickly!


~Kira~
Check out my Flickr for lots of aviation and nature related photography: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/skys_flickr/
Check out my Facebook fan page for my best of the best imagery. Give it a thumbs up if you like what you see! https://www.facebook.c​om/PhotographybyKiraAn​dreola (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
magwai
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,094 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Guildford, UK
     
Jan 22, 2015 22:17 |  #6

I doubt if there was much heat near the kit. It was on the floor above the fire in camera bags. the smoke was thick and I am worried about dirt getting inside bodies and lenses.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Jan 22, 2015 22:23 |  #7

magwai wrote in post #17395274 (external link)
I can claim if I can provide evidence of damage. What should I look for?

Ask your insurer before doing anything. They may have an adjustor familiar with cameras or they may send you to someone who regularly provides expertise for them. If you do not agree with their assessment you always have the option to seek out your own expert in the form of an authorized service centre. A repair estimate or diagnosis should be at little or no cost to you.


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vk2gwk
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,360 posts
Gallery: 332 photos
Likes: 1836
Joined Jun 2009
Location: One Mile Beach, NSW 2316, Australia
     
Jan 22, 2015 22:25 |  #8

The problem with smoke is that it contains a fair bit of chemicals that - together with moisture (like humid air) - can create acids and other aggressive reagents. The effects of smoke contamination will only appear over time, sometimes months later as the acids are very slow but gradually affecting the electronics (switch contacts, corrosion on soldering joints in SMD components and connectors).
So I am pretty sure that when you ask a specialist repair shop or service centre for an evaluation they tell you: write the gear off.
Lenses contains a lot of electronics these days so these are equally affected.

Good to hear there were no casualties! Gear is replaceable.


My name is Henk. and I believe "It is all in the eye of the beholder....."
Image Editing is allowed. Please explain what you did!
Canon R5, R,, RF24-105/1:4 + RF70-200mm F/2.8 + RF15-35mm F/2.8 + 50mm 1.4 USM + Sigma 150-600mm Sports + RF100mm F/2.8 + GODOX V860 IIC+ 430EX + YN568EXII, triggers, reflectors, umbrellas and some more bits and pieces...
Photos on: Flickr! (external link) and on my own web site. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
magwai
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,094 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Guildford, UK
     
Jan 23, 2015 14:19 |  #9

Thanks that is helpful. Most of my kit is old so it would be of great benefit to buy new for old. However given it works right now I need to justify that.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.Horton
worship my useful and insightful comments
Avatar
18,051 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Royersford, PA
     
Feb 21, 2015 15:25 |  #10

See if you're insurer will pay for a cleaning of all gear. While they're at it, they can tell you if anything is really damaged. I'd be most concerned about what it looks like in a year or so. Cannot be good.


Sam - TF Says Ishmael
http://midnightblue.sm​ugmug.com (external link) 
Want your title changed?Dream On! (external link)

:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.Horton
worship my useful and insightful comments
Avatar
18,051 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Royersford, PA
     
Feb 21, 2015 15:26 |  #11

By the by, glad everyone is ok.


Sam - TF Says Ishmael
http://midnightblue.sm​ugmug.com (external link) 
Want your title changed?Dream On! (external link)

:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,920 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
house fire: smoke damage?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1455 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.