Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 24 Jan 2015 (Saturday) 17:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canonscan 8800F

 
Ronny ­ Geenen
Member
Avatar
125 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2011
     
Jan 24, 2015 17:19 |  #1

I hope this is the right place to talk/ask question about using the this scanner.
I start scanning about 2000 - 35mm negatives into my computer. That said, what is the best way to scan them in my computer? Canon instruction says the emulsion layer facing down. But when I do this the text on the scan pictures are showing up in a mirror situation. When I scan the negatives facing up, the text is alright. Quality wise I do-not see any differences.
Beside that is 600 dpi sufficient for a person who wants to print the scanned pictures smaller than 8/12x11.
Some, I am going to keep, I will scan at 1200dpi or do I need to go higher. The scanner options is going up to 2400 and 4800 dpi, but that takes a lot of time, I guess.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gerald ­ Treadwell
Mostly Lurking
16 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: lousianna
     
Jan 25, 2015 08:44 |  #2

You can scan straight into PS and flip it. The higher the resolution the more time it takes obviously and up to a point you don't gain anything. Scan them small and if there's a particular one you like then re-scan at a higher resolution to get the detail you want. Google scanning negatives and there are some good techniques for doing color and/or black and white.


Be the kind of person your dog thinks you are.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Jan 25, 2015 10:04 |  #3

You might want to reconsider whether 600 dpi is really sufficient for 8x11 prints. Your 35 mm negative is just under 1"x1-1/2" image area, so you'll have about 600x900 dpi - that's going to be about 78 dpi on the final print. Pretty coarse.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Jan 25, 2015 14:17 |  #4

Your scanner really can't do that resolution. It's more like 1800 dpi, which is what you should use for printing 8x10" prints.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,462 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4548
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 8 years ago by Wilt. (7 edits in all)
     
Jan 25, 2015 14:52 |  #5

Procedurally, are you using Canon's MP Navigator scanning software for input?

  • If so, MP Navigator properly copies BOTH negatives or slides in the correct orientation when the emulsion side is AWAY from the glass.
    Notice the legend on the 8800F supplied film holders shows a backward yet rightside-up (not upside down) 'R' to indicate film orientation in the holder.
    The Canon 8800F guide says "face side down", without reference to 'emulsion side of film'! So you are not following their directions on film orientation.

  • When you use MP Navigator, you can choose Document Type: Negative Film or Document Type: Positive Film , and...
  • ...then the MP Navigator software defaults to Resolution: 1200 dpi. (If you change the Resolution setting, the MP Navigator remembers your selection the next time you choose the same Document Type.) MP Navigator menu choices only allows 300/400/600/1200/2400/​4800 dpi values, you cannot type in a value like '1800'


While you can get away with 8x10 from neg scanned at 1200 dpi (1200 pixels/8" = 96 dpi on print), 2400 dpi would be better, if not wanting to maximize scan time.

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronny ­ Geenen
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
125 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2011
     
Jan 26, 2015 12:26 as a reply to  @ Wilt's post |  #6

Wilt: Thank you for the clear explanation. Canon brochure confuse me, because English is my second language.
I am going to scan all the negatives with 1200 dpi and after that I am selecting some of the nice ones with 2400 dpi.
Also most of the pictures are going to be used for articles on my website and an international magazine.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,188 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Canonscan 8800F
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1373 guests, 121 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.