Obviously the resolution is impressive......wonder what the Dynamic Range is of this beast?
http://www.canonrumors.com …eos-5ds-r-specifications/
Canon_Shoe Goldmember  More info | Jan 30, 2015 11:12 | #1 Obviously the resolution is impressive......wonder what the Dynamic Range is of this beast? Facebook-- http://www.facebook.com/AndrewShoemakerPhotography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 30, 2015 11:41 | #2 PhotoRec Toby gives his views. Canon 6D: Canon 85mm f/1.8 ~ Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 ~ 70-300mm f/4.0 - f/5.6 ~ Carl Zeiss 50mm f/1.4 ~ Carl Zeiss 100mm f/2.0
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 30, 2015 14:30 | #3 |
Jan 30, 2015 14:36 | #4 1.3x, 1.6x crop factor shooting modes..... interesting to see how canon implements that. Will this new body be able to use EF-s lenses? Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
runninmann what the heck do I know?  More info Post edited over 8 years ago by runninmann. | Jan 30, 2015 14:57 | #5 Charlie wrote in post #17407510 Will this new body be able to use EF-s lenses? I'd be willing to bet not.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
johnvanr Member 51 posts Best ofs: 1 Likes: 51 Joined Jan 2013 More info | Jan 30, 2015 14:57 | #6 It's all going back to the same source. I'll just wait and see.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bearmann Goldmember  1,228 posts Likes: 57 Joined Feb 2008 Location: I live behind Graceland in a tool shed. I often meet the man early in the morning at Krispy Kreme. More info Post edited over 8 years ago by Bearmann. | Jan 30, 2015 15:16 | #7 I'm surprised at the maximum iso of 6400. I thought most cameras had pushed beyond that now. Barry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NASSPhoto Goldmember  2,478 posts Likes: 899 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Westmoreland Co., PA More info | Jan 30, 2015 15:26 | #8 Cannot wait for more info. We will see what happens next week. NickS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 30, 2015 15:34 | #9 Charlie wrote in post #17407510 1.3x, 1.6x crop factor shooting modes..... interesting to see how canon implements that. Will this new body be able to use EF-s lenses? My assumption is that that just cuts down the number of pixels to increase framerate. Could be wrong, of course. https://www.flickr.com/photos/127590681@N03/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigAl007 Cream of the Crop  8,118 posts Gallery: 556 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 1681 Joined Dec 2010 Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK. More info | Jan 30, 2015 17:55 | #10 An in camera 1.3 or 1.6× crop on this sort of specification body makes a lot of sense. After all the a FF 56 mpix sensor will have the same linear resolution as a 22 Mpix 1.6 crop. I can think of lots of situations where I would happily allow the camera to crop the image to improve both frame rate and RAW file buffer size. As this would actually be a crop you do not adversely affect the RAW data by having to interpolate sensel data as has to be done when using mRAW and sRAW in current bodies. It should not be to hard for the electronics to simply read the central chunk of the sensor instead of all of it. It could offer some rather interesting choices. Super high res slow FF studio and speedy crop sports/action camera all in one body. Imagine this sensor in a 1 series body. Where Canon have unleashed everything.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kumquatism Member 30 posts Likes: 4 Joined Aug 2010 More info | Jan 30, 2015 18:01 | #11 Interesting specs. Must wait til official announcement to see what Canon has in store for us!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info Post edited over 8 years ago by Sirrith. | Feb 01, 2015 19:50 | #12 I'd be surprised if any 5D replacement were announced this year. Previous 5D's were replaced after at least 1-2 more years "in service" if I recall. -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tzalman Fatal attraction.  13,497 posts Likes: 213 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel More info | Feb 02, 2015 04:22 | #13 Sirrith wrote in post #17410912 I'd be surprised if any 5D replacement were announced this year. Previous 5D's were replaced after at least 1-2 more years "in service" if I recall. 5D - Aug. 22, 2005 Elie / אלי
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 02, 2015 05:37 | #14 tzalman wrote in post #17411344 5D - Aug. 22, 2005 5D2 - Sept. 17, 2008 5D3 - March 2, 2012 5D>5D2 = 3 years, 1 month. 5D2>5D3 = 3 years, 6 months. I guess I recall incorrectly then, thanks. -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Gobeatty Senior Member 513 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2013 More info | Feb 02, 2015 17:15 | #15 So...with doubling the count in the same FF area, each pixel must be smaller. Would we expect the camera to be noisier than the current 5D3 and 6D? 6D | 35 f2 | 50 1.8 | 85 1.8 | 28 - 135 f3.5 - 5.6 | 70-210 f4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Marcsaa 1330 guests, 115 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
