Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 03 Feb 2015 (Tuesday) 06:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Single exposure looks too photoshopped?

 
urbanfreestyle
I am a squirrel who loves rubbing bottles and I have Nuts in my drawers, too!
Avatar
2,060 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 228
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Exeter, Devon
Post edited over 8 years ago by urbanfreestyle.
     
Feb 03, 2015 06:32 |  #1

So i was having some issues where my panning was apparently too damn good! It was taken as a single frame but it looks like the bike has been superimposed onto the background...
I spent some time trying to get it to look right, for some reason the background looked a bit de-saturated.

I'd love some feedback on the original and the final edit.

Thanks in advance.

Original

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/02/1/LQ_711075.jpg
Image hosted by forum (711075) © urbanfreestyle [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Edit

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/02/1/LQ_711076.jpg
Image hosted by forum (711076) © urbanfreestyle [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Facebook (external link)
Canon 1D Mk IV | Canon 50mm 1.8 Mk1 | Sigma 'Bigma' 50-500 | Fuji XE1 | Helios 44/m | 50mm 1.4 | Manfrotto 055CX PRO3 | 3LT Mohawk ballhead | Lubitel 2 med format camera |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Feb 03, 2015 07:54 |  #2

colors look good to me, although you might have gone a bit far with the blue in the sky.

also, from a design point of view, you might try the superimposed biker on the other side of the frame and a bit smaller. maybe the same size as the original. and maybe a bit more transparent? maybe?

:P


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saea501
... spilled over a little on the panties
Avatar
6,772 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 10455
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Florida
     
Feb 04, 2015 06:02 |  #3

You might also want to tell the bike owner to put some air in his rear tire. That one looks dangerously low.


Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
Bob
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/147975282@N06 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
urbanfreestyle
THREAD ­ STARTER
I am a squirrel who loves rubbing bottles and I have Nuts in my drawers, too!
Avatar
2,060 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 228
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Exeter, Devon
     
Feb 04, 2015 09:28 as a reply to  @ saea501's post |  #4

haha, aparently it was for more grip!?

and i tried moving the superimposed over and thought it looks pants! lol will try reducing the blue. do you think the angle works? it all looks a bit off angle to me. maybe only by 1-2 degrees.


Facebook (external link)
Canon 1D Mk IV | Canon 50mm 1.8 Mk1 | Sigma 'Bigma' 50-500 | Fuji XE1 | Helios 44/m | 50mm 1.4 | Manfrotto 055CX PRO3 | 3LT Mohawk ballhead | Lubitel 2 med format camera |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perry ­ Ge
Batteries? We don't need no...   . . . or cards.
Avatar
12,266 posts
Gallery: 83 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 298
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Hong Kong
     
Feb 07, 2015 05:55 |  #5

I don't like the superimposed image or the text, it looks gimmicky. I also agree about the sky looking a bit blue too. It's a bit off angle but that's an easy fix with the ruler crop tool in Photoshop as you have tons of horizontal lines to use as guides. Otherwise, your editing is solid and this is a pretty kick-ass shot. Well done.


Perry | www.perryge.com (external link) | flickr (external link) | C&C always welcome | Market Feedback & Gear | Sharpening sticky | Perspective sticky

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DGStinner
Goldmember
Avatar
1,042 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 198
Joined Jan 2014
Location: Middlesex, New Jersey
     
Feb 07, 2015 07:08 |  #6

I'm not a fan of the superimposed image as it covers up part of the bike. Is the superimposed image supposed to make it appear as though two bikes are drag racing to go along with the "Dakota Drag Racing" text?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
urbanfreestyle
THREAD ­ STARTER
I am a squirrel who loves rubbing bottles and I have Nuts in my drawers, too!
Avatar
2,060 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 228
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Exeter, Devon
     
Feb 07, 2015 07:36 as a reply to  @ DGStinner's post |  #7

No it's just to break up the image a little and offer a close up view.
the Dakota Dr was a bit of an after thought so people know where it was taken.


Facebook (external link)
Canon 1D Mk IV | Canon 50mm 1.8 Mk1 | Sigma 'Bigma' 50-500 | Fuji XE1 | Helios 44/m | 50mm 1.4 | Manfrotto 055CX PRO3 | 3LT Mohawk ballhead | Lubitel 2 med format camera |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
moshmeister
Member
Avatar
40 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Missouri
     
Feb 15, 2015 03:01 |  #8

I like the original much better than the edited. I don't think think it looks fake at all. Nice photo!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
urbanfreestyle
THREAD ­ STARTER
I am a squirrel who loves rubbing bottles and I have Nuts in my drawers, too!
Avatar
2,060 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 228
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Exeter, Devon
     
Feb 15, 2015 13:13 as a reply to  @ moshmeister's post |  #9

Thanks for the reply. the more i look at the shot the more i like it :)


Facebook (external link)
Canon 1D Mk IV | Canon 50mm 1.8 Mk1 | Sigma 'Bigma' 50-500 | Fuji XE1 | Helios 44/m | 50mm 1.4 | Manfrotto 055CX PRO3 | 3LT Mohawk ballhead | Lubitel 2 med format camera |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Davevw3
Member
Avatar
173 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2014
     
Feb 15, 2015 20:59 |  #10

moshmeister wrote in post #17432404 (external link)
I like the original much better than the edited. I don't think think it looks fake at all. Nice photo!

I agree


"Smile, nod, and back away."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,905 views & 2 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Single exposure looks too photoshopped?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1509 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.