Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Data Storage, Memory Cards & Backup 
Thread started 04 Feb 2015 (Wednesday) 13:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

My Path to NAS Storage

 
bikfoto
Alexander the Wannabe
Avatar
423 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Feb 04, 2015 13:41 |  #1

I wanted to share my story about NAS (Network Attached Storage) that I started to appreciate more and more. As a photographer – hobbyist, I have been a long-time fan of the PC. In fact, I built my latest desktop 5 years ago in order to dedicate it to my photo editing. However, after my wife presented me with a 15″ MacBook Pro in October, it all changed in a second. I no longer was using my desktop to do photo editing, website building, as well as my daily professional work. However, I still wanted to keep my desktop as a backup as well as a major storage of my images.
Here’s how it worked before:
I would do most of my photo editing on a laptop. Then, I would transfer the images onto the desktop. But wait…. As it turns out, Apple’s file system is not compatible with the Windows NTFS! Now it becomes a struggle. I installed a virtual Windows 10 beta desktop on the Mac so I could still transfer images from it. Then, my desktop would automatically be backed up onto the cloud (I use CrashPlan for that, but more on it later). Essentially the PC became a 4Tb storage that would create a replica copy of itself on a nightly basis. At the same time, my MacBook would also have a backup client installed. But as it turns out, I did not have a 24/7 access to all my files. In order to do that, I would have to leave my noisy powerful desktop ON at all times! Furthermore, the Intel Core i7 (overclocked), the nVidia EVGA 285GTX video card, as well as the 850W Power Supply – all consumed way too much power!
All of the above have pushed me to disassemble and get rid of my desktop.
Welcome, Synology DS214+ NAS!
synology ds214


IMAGE: http://www.bikfoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/synology-ds214.jpg



After doing my research and hesitating between QNAP and Synology, I decided to give Synology a try. It was due to the DiskStation software which they recently upgraded to version 5.1. It allows a seamless access to my files after a minor router modification. All that is required is to forward a port via “port forwarding” to your Synology’s IP address – and it’s all set! One of the challenges, however, was to move data back onto NAS. Once a drive is inserted into Synology, it automatically formats it to its own file system. Therefore, I only inserted one new hard disk (WD RED 4Tb), keeping my original 4Tb drive as a spare for now until all of the data is migrated from CrashPlan.
After spending almost a week with Synology, my initial thoughts are:
Easy to setup
CPU gets overloaded quite frequently. Transcoding images and videos has it running at 99% capacity for extended periods of time
RAM rarely gets to more than 50%
Restore from CrashPlan takes a while. And that considering I have a 320mbps down / 22mbps up cable connection! (For those of you interested – it’s Time Warner’s new MAXX plan :) )
DiskStation Manager 5.1 is a pure beauty! It even allows for automatic iPhone backup to NAS.
The unit is very quiet. I believe it only has 1 fan. It also runs very cool, and actually looks like a nice accessory on the desk.
For those not interested in changing router configs, Synology allows QuickConnect feature to be used. It’s an excellent way to connect to your personal NAS from WAN (outside of your home network).
Phone applications are great. There are 6 total apps, including file manager, photo +, video +, and more.
It works with both: MAC and PC’s. I have the NAS mounted on my MacBook 100% of the time.
Installing CrashPlan requires a little tweaking. However, there are multiple instructions available online. I can confirm 100% that it works. You can back up your NAS, and you can restore other backups on NAS. The restore feature is what I’ve used to load data back on the 4Tb drive.
USB drives plugged in must be reformatted with the Synology file system. This was a big red flag for me initially, as I expected to migrate my data via external USB drive.
After the initial restore, I’m planning to setup a Raid 1 configuration for complete data redundancy. Both of the 4Tb drives would mirror one another. I know that it’s essentially taking my 4Tb drive. However, if going with a Raid 5 configuration, and the Synology 415+ Quad-Core unit, I’d have to buy 4 4Tb drives, which would cost more than $600 for drives only. Add $600 for the NAS unit, and it becomes a $1200 NAS with 12Tb of storage. Next upgrade? Maybe… But not as a first step into NAS.
After all, and a month of hesitation, I’m glad I made the choice of going with NAS. Synology is a leader in the field, and we also use them at work in an enterprise data center setup. It definitely made my photography hobby a more pleasant experience. Not only I no longer have to worry about moving data back and forth, but it allows me to dedicate my time strictly to photography and editing without thinking that my images are secured and backed up. It also made it simpler for travel photography, where after a day of shooting I could then upload my images onto my personal NAS during the night. It’s all about making the life simpler. Great job, Synology!

For more info feel free to PM me, and I'll be glad to share what I know.

bikfoto (external link)
Need a WEBSITE? (external link)
Gear & Feedback
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
flowrider
Goldmember
Avatar
3,607 posts
Gallery: 127 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 839
Joined Dec 2009
Location: 604
     
Feb 04, 2015 14:39 |  #2

Great review. I have the 214SE and my experiences are similar mainly because of the great software. Are you also using an external connected to the NAS as a backup?


~Steve~
~ My Website-stevelowephoto.com (external link) ~ Facebook (external link)
Feedback Feedback Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bikfoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Alexander the Wannabe
Avatar
423 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Feb 05, 2015 18:32 as a reply to  @ flowrider's post |  #3

I'm actually backing up NAS to CrashPlan. I've had great success with them. I've also restored my original files from CrashPlan onto the NAS. This was my way of testing it as well as to do transfer data.

I have a 300+mbps / 20+mbps connection at home, so my speed is quite fast to backup on WAN.


bikfoto (external link)
Need a WEBSITE? (external link)
Gear & Feedback
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dkizzle
Goldmember
1,184 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Mar 2012
     
Feb 09, 2015 10:54 |  #4

Thanks for the review. I will be going with Synology & Crashplan route in the near future.


I want to guest blog on your Landscape / Travel photography blog, PM for details

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Fujifilmnut
Member
Avatar
71 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2005
     
Feb 13, 2015 11:36 |  #5

Synology DiskStations are excellent as well as their management software. Currently I am using a pair of DS 412, production and backup. Also using external disk backup on each for a library of about 100K images.

Be careful with the ports and it is a good idea to change from the factory default ports when making your DS available on the Internet - just in case.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Feb 15, 2015 13:20 |  #6

Having a low powered computer (which is what a NAS is) doing transcoding is always going to max out the CPU.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neil_g
Senior Member
Avatar
708 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2005
Location: South, UK
     
Feb 16, 2015 02:28 |  #7

my old DS1010+ which ran an Intel Atom D510 1.67GHz, Dual Core, with floating point - RAM Size: 1 GB was actually pretty good at transcoding. better than my HP N40L running AMD Turion II Neo N40L 1.5 Ghz Dual Core - RAM size: 8GB despite the AMD benching at 964 compared to 667 (source cpubenchmark.net)


Burp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bikfoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Alexander the Wannabe
Avatar
423 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Feb 17, 2015 14:07 |  #8

What you guys have to realize is that there's a NAS for everyone. For my purposes, I'm not doing ANY transcoding. In fact, I tried to stay with the lower end CPU due to the power consumption, since my NAS would have to be ON most of the time (backing up to the cloud). Had I been watching movies, I'd definitely would stick to my old Core i7 / SSD desktop which I've been using up till that moment, or invested in a high powered NAS with dual quad-core CPU's racked up in a garage :-)

To each their own :-P


bikfoto (external link)
Need a WEBSITE? (external link)
Gear & Feedback
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neil_g
Senior Member
Avatar
708 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2005
Location: South, UK
Post edited over 8 years ago by neil_g.
     
Feb 18, 2015 02:38 |  #9

for what its worth, the extra power consumption on the 5 bay synology isnt worth worrying about. its something like 38W at full load with all bays populated. and thats with the quad core Intel Atom C2538 2.4.


Burp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Fast351
Member
60 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Jan 2014
Location: Minnesota
     
Mar 02, 2015 08:33 |  #10

I'm running an older QNAP (TS439PROII). I've had it for about 6 years now and finally replaced the original 750GB drives with 3TB NAS specific drives.

Just remember that even with RAID5 or RAID6 they're not 100% data safe. Make your backups!

Here's what I'm doing right now:

1) UPS! Put your NAS on a UPS. The biggest failure reason for most computer equipment is power glitches. I get an e-mail every 2-3 months that the NAS was running on backup power for a couple of minutes, and sure enough when I get home the clocks are blinking...

2) I'm running 4 drives, 3 in RAID5, and a hot spare (starts rebuilding immediately when the NAS discovers a drive running in degraded mode).

You should always buy a spare drive to have on hand. I prefer to have mine as a hot spare, but even if you're running RAID6, or a mirrored setup with a 2 drive cage, until you replace a failed drive you're open to total data loss. 3 years from now getting a replacement drive identical to what you have now will be difficult. (Of course most NAS cages don't care about that).

You should also make sure you're running NAS drives. The firmware is different, because NAS systems typically have a shorter timeout before declaring a read failure. If you run desktop drives, and it "retries" for 20 seconds on a bad sector read, but the NAS times out after 7, now you have a degraded RAID. If the second drive does the same thing, you just lost all your data.

And finally, MAKE BACKUPS! Offsite is preferred. I have a portable 1TB drive that I keep at my cabin with all my photos on it. If I ever have a fire at home, at least I won't lose all my pictures. (I also run a software company so I keep my source on there too).


Mike
flickr (external link)
Canon EOS R6 | Tokina 11-16 f2.8 DX | Canon RF 24-105L f4 | Canon ES 35 f2.0 IS | Canon ES 70-200L III | Canon ES 100-400L II
Canon EOS SL1 | Sigma 18-300

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CeGe
Member
53 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2012
     
Mar 11, 2015 20:28 |  #11

Thanks for the info Bikfoto. I am thinking about setting up my own NAS. Do you have your music collection on the NAS? If so, can you play it on a tablet or a phone?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bikfoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Alexander the Wannabe
Avatar
423 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Mar 25, 2015 19:37 as a reply to  @ CeGe's post |  #12

I don't have my music collection (thanks to Spotify / Di.FM), however I do have my photo collection as well as a bunch of presets and other apps that I regularly backup. Also, Synology acts as my primary backup for iPhones for myself and my wife.

As for music / photo / video - you can stream all of them on a bunch of devices with no issues. In fact, you can access your photo collection via their app or via a domain (yourname.synology.com​) and signing in with a username & password. It looks just like a Dropbox. The apps also transcode the videos for you (which uses lots of CPU power btw). Also, you can now stream them onto DLNA or Chromecast. There are 6 total apps for iphone / ipad / android - fileshare, cloudstation, photo+, video, music, and something else that I can't recall now :)

One issue that I wanted to throw out there is that I've started experiencing some issues with CrashPlan backup. It looks like with the new software update - it broke the headless client. Hopefully their DSM 5.2 will fix the issue.

Hope it helps!


bikfoto (external link)
Need a WEBSITE? (external link)
Gear & Feedback
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,145 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
My Path to NAS Storage
FORUMS General Gear Talk Data Storage, Memory Cards & Backup 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1507 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.