I liked this shot due to the way the lines of the shadow and the way the truss is peaking out of the tree line but wanted to see what others thought.
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
Feb 06, 2015 13:12 | #1 I liked this shot due to the way the lines of the shadow and the way the truss is peaking out of the tree line but wanted to see what others thought. Image hosted by forum (711605) © raptor3x [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Bodies: X-T1, E-M1ii, G9 Lenses: µ.Z 7-14 2.8, µ.Z 12-40 2.8, µ.Z 25 1.2, X 18-55 2.8-4, µ.Z 40-150 2.8, µ.Z 45 1.2, µ.Z 60 2.8, µ.Z 75 1.8, PL 200 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ToddLambert I don't like titles More info | Feb 06, 2015 13:29 | #2 I like it, but I wonder if the creek in the bottom is necessary for this shot. You've got a lot going on up top, and I wonder if cropping the very bottom and right edge out, might work better. That would put more focus on the elements you mention, which I agree... are the strongest points of this photo.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joedlh Cream of the Crop 5,513 posts Gallery: 52 photos Likes: 684 Joined Dec 2007 Location: Long Island, NY, N. America, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Laniakea. More info | Feb 06, 2015 15:40 | #3 I like the creek, as it gives context. However, I would also like the creek to be level. The tilt is unbalancing to the eye, especially when there's water in an image. It looks like you took the shot near sunset or just after sunrise. I wonder if there's a bit too much of a gold cast. Play around with white balance and see what you think. Joe
LOG IN TO REPLY |
freestylee30 Senior Member More info | Feb 06, 2015 15:46 | #4 Neat shot, I like it quite a bit! I especially like the trestle and its support disappearing into the forest. Brandon | zenfolio
LOG IN TO REPLY |
itsallart Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 06, 2015 16:07 | #5 raptor3x wrote in post #17418712 I liked this shot due to the way the lines of the shadow and the way the truss is peaking out of the tree line but wanted to see what others thought. I do like the shot and the diagonal lines. As someone stated below that your image could be cropped. The center line of the trestle doesn't seems vertical, so if you rotate it just slightly, the image will benefit from it. Now, if you crop the shot and position the center of the trestle according to the rule of thirds it may really turn into a lovely image. Renata
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PerryGe Batteries? We don't need no... . . . or cards. More info | Feb 07, 2015 05:43 | #6 I agree with what the others have said, and this shot has great potential. The light is nice and there are a lot of interesting elements. Perry | www.perryge.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LeftHandedBrisket Combating camera shame since 1977... More info Post edited over 8 years ago by Left Handed Brisket. | Feb 07, 2015 06:03 | #7 Perry Ge wrote in post #17419859 I agree with what the others have said, and this shot has great potential. The light is nice and there are a lot of interesting elements. There's something weird-looking about the composition to me, because it's basically a line down the middle and a diagonal across the top third, with the nice creek only occupying about 10% of the frame at the bottom. If we break your image down, the trees and truss are your midground, the sky is your background and the creek is your foreground. But the foreground feels like an after-thought (which kind of makes sense because the lighting is so much better on the midground). Is there any chance of a re-shoot? I think it'd look better if the foreground played a bigger role in the image, or if you can't reshoot see what it looks like if you get rid of the foreground altogether. Maybe if you got really low near the creek or tilted the camera downwards a bit to use the creek as a more prominent leading line through the picture. Overall, the pic could also use some additional punching up in post. Hope that helps! I quite like this photo! Good analysis. My first thought was I'd like to see more of the creek which I think would make it more of a traditional landscape. PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 911 guests, 118 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||