Which do you like best?
Smaller one is better composition, while larger waterfall was really tough to get close to.
Unnamed Falls, WA. by jordynmurdock, on Flickr
First Falls, WA. by jordynmurdock, on Flickr
JMPhotos "Childhood ruined"  More info | Feb 10, 2015 16:49 | #1 Which do you like best? Unnamed Falls, WA. by jordynmurdock, on Flickr First Falls, WA. by jordynmurdock, on FlickrCanon 6D, & Sony α6000
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KoalaCowboy Goldmember  More info | Feb 10, 2015 19:44 | #2 I like the first; more intimate. The second, to me, has the distracting branches mid-level on right side of waterfall. - -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
imaterpfan Member  34 posts Likes: 4 Joined May 2007 Location: Elkridge, MD More info | Feb 10, 2015 22:36 | #3 I prefer the first waterfall. For me, there is a little too much in the foreground in the 2nd that makes it a little too distracting for my taste. _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
psurrette Senior Member  More info | Feb 10, 2015 22:38 | #4 I agree with other posters, first one is a nicer photo. Better light, more delicate water. Both are great captures however. |SportsShooter Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dkizzle Goldmember 1,184 posts Likes: 35 Joined Mar 2012 More info | Feb 11, 2015 06:44 | #5 I prefer #2, shows more of the nature scene and helps me relate more to what I am seeing. I want to guest blog on your Landscape / Travel photography blog, PM for details
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhilRose Member 46 posts Likes: 3 Joined Mar 2014 More info | Feb 13, 2015 05:29 | #7 Both are pretty, but number one makes me feel like I'm there, but the extra stuff between the camera and the falls in number two says "appreciated from a distance". I feel like I want to get closer. -Phil
LOG IN TO REPLY |
YELLERLAB Senior Member  More info | Feb 13, 2015 07:55 | #8 Both are good. I like #1 the most. Terry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cerett Senior Member 823 posts Likes: 240 Joined Jun 2013 Location: Santa Ana, California More info Post edited over 8 years ago by cerett. | Feb 15, 2015 16:47 | #9 IMO, the second image is out of balance (composition). The main subject is the waterfall and not the "twigs" below. I would kinda like to see what the water is falling into. I assume, as you said, there may have been problems getting closer and higher. The exposure on both images is excellent. https://www.martinfeldmanphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 16, 2015 00:25 | #10 cerett wrote in post #17433171 IMO, the second image is out of balance (composition). The main subject is the waterfall and not the "twigs" below. I would kinda like to see what the water is falling into. I assume, as you said, there may have been problems getting closer and higher. The exposure on both images is excellent. I would have loved to get closer! After tromping through ankle-deep wet mud, I would have had to climb up a LARGE pile of rock/logs. I actually started climbing over the rock/log jam and when I stepped on one of the large rocks, I felt it start to rumble, followed by a cracking sound beneath me. I promptly (but carefully) turned around and went back down where I came from. On top of all that, the spray looked to be problematic above the rock/log jam. Canon 6D, & Sony α6000
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1524 guests, 123 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
