Upper Multnomah Falls (3-shot horizontal pano)

I wasn't able to get the full upper falls into one shot when I was standing on the bridge so I took three horizontal shots to stitch a small vertical pano. What do you think?

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/qZjw​Z4

AAA+ Jim, fabulous! Worked very well, that will make for a beautiful print. (That deserves a pat on the back for yourself).

That fall is one of a few scenes where I prefer the bridge included to give a sense of size and scale.

Your shot gives the impression is was taken farther back than standing on the bridge.

At Flikr, in the file, are the tiny color specks lower left corner, people walking along the side?

Top rock looks sharp, but foreground, longer exposures sure allow mist-pushed wind to move plants and blur details. I find waterfall areas challenging.
...

I was there in January, it was covered in ice! The bridge had easy 2 inches of ice all over and you could not get much further up the trail than that. Looked spectacular, if you ever get a chance to go when it's been really cold for a while. We checked out most of the falls along the road there. Of course, it was only a 3 day visit family trip and I only had my phone with me to take photos, LOL

Nice shot

I can really feel the spray in this shot.

A well done stich , but the prespective seems/it's a bit concaved for me
The people in the lower left side not in really step terrain - it's sort of a pool area, before second tier waterfall), and it makes that lower cascade look a bit more vertical than it is.
It's a hard shot, specially so close - only a tilt-shift lens or UWA (probably 14 or less) would correct the prespective here, but still like the shot

mdvaden wrote in post #17440948
That fall is one of a few scenes where I prefer the bridge included to give a sense of size and scale.

Your shot gives the impression is was taken farther back than standing on the bridge.

At Flikr, in the file, are the tiny color specks lower left corner, people walking along the side?

Top rock looks sharp, but foreground, longer exposures sure allow mist-pushed wind to move plants and blur details. I find waterfall areas challenging.
...

NWPhil wrote in post #17445988
A well done stich , but the prespective seems/it's a bit concaved for me
The people in the lower left side not in really step terrain - it's sort of a pool area, before second tier waterfall), and it makes that lower cascade look a bit more vertical than it is.
It's a hard shot, specially so close - only a tilt-shift lens or UWA (probably 14 or less) would correct the prespective here, but still like the shot

Thanks for the input everyone! Those are not people in the lower left. That is water that is on the lens that I must have missed in post.

JM Photos wrote in post #17446547
Thanks for the input everyone! Those are not people in the lower left. That is water that is on the lens that I must have missed in post.

You were there, but red, cyan and somewhat greenish /blue droplets?
the red jacket is above the big rock on the lower left - the other two slight south west/left of the big rock (actually the rock has a white spot)

Since the landslide in '95 people are not allowed near the base of the falls. I remember going into the pools as a kid.

still puzzled j=how water droplets get those colors...

unfortunately, the " not allowed" does not mean anything/much these days.
If you visit the Painted Hills in John Days National Monument's area, you will see first hand how signs alone are not being enough to deter people of walking on the dunes and hills.
Pretty sad after seeing the damaged done since my last visit 4 years ago

You guys, it's NOT people. You want a heavy crop to prove it? Here is a screen shot.
Those are clearly water/sun spots. There was no one down below the falls while I was there.

I can also assure you that with a 2 second exposure, that is not how people would turn out looking in the shot.