Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Gear Reviews Camera Reviews 
Thread started 20 Feb 2015 (Friday) 15:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
TOGGLE RATINGS BETWEEN ALL AND CyberDyneSystems (showing now: CyberDyneSystems)
Overall Rating9.5
Overall Image Quality9.5
Value for Money9
Must Have10
Suitability to Intended Use10
Got What I Expected10
AF Performance9.5
Handling and Ergonomics9.5
User-interface9.5
Ownership Status: "own"

Click here for sample photos and more info.
Click ratings to see total averages and rating distributions.
List all reviews of Canon EOS 1D Mark IV

Canon EOS 1D Mark IV, reviewed by CyberDyneSystems

 
CyberDyneSystems
THREAD ­ STARTER
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
48,408 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 4510
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
Post edited over 1 year ago by CyberDyneSystems.
     
Jul 03, 2017 14:45 |  #16

From an AF POV and an IQ POV I found the 1D4 / 5D3 to be very similar quality.
So it's a tough question. When you say "night photography" are you talking about astro? If so you might want to ask the astro shooters,.

Also if you really like wide angle lenses, go for the FF 5D3. Unlike APS-C sensor bodies,. the APS-H sensor size in the 1D4 means you can not take advantage of low cost high quality EF-S lenses. Your FF lenses will not be as wide angle.

for bird photography, I would chose the 1D4.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Magnus3D
Goldmember
Avatar
1,351 posts
Gallery: 154 photos
Likes: 688
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
     
Nov 06, 2017 16:52 |  #17

Is anyone still using this old workhorse anymore or have you all upgraded to the latest and greatest Canon has to offer ?

/ Magnus


| Lots of cheap camera gear |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CH_Devin
Senior Member
537 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 58
Joined Sep 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
Post edited 8 months ago by CH_Devin.
     
Nov 06, 2017 20:39 |  #18

Great review. It still rings true, years later. I just picked up a used 1D4 with 30k on the shutter for $1195 to photograph sports. I find it much more efficient than a full frame cameras.


16-35mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
THREAD ­ STARTER
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
48,408 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 4510
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
Post edited 8 months ago by CyberDyneSystems.
     
Nov 06, 2017 21:05 |  #19

Magnus, I still dust mine off every now and then.

Myself and Dave both used mine in Botswana this past August,. and I use it alongside my 5D4 for portrait and group senior photos for my Wife's school.

There is a thread that remains pretty active here on POTN as well.
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=809332


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
Avatar
7,710 posts
Likes: 2616
Joined Oct 2015
     
Nov 06, 2017 23:58 |  #20

I sold mine. Wrecked my motorcycle and my arm. Needed something lighter. Iloved that body, fantastically customizable.


Tom

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CH_Devin
Senior Member
537 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 58
Joined Sep 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
     
Nov 07, 2017 01:22 |  #21

Bassat wrote in post #18490491 (external link)
I sold mine. Wrecked my motorcycle and my arm. Needed something lighter. Iloved that body, fantastically customizable.

that sucks. i hope you feel better and make a full recovery.


16-35mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perfectly ­ Frank
I'm too sexy for my lens
3,697 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Likes: 1143
Joined Oct 2010
     
Nov 07, 2017 02:11 |  #22

I have 2 1D4 cameras. One I bought new ($5k) the other used from a POTN member. Bought mainly for aviation photography.

About a year ago I added the 80D to my gear collection. I wanted to see how the 1.6 crop, 24mp sensor would benefit over 1D4. I was not disappointed, especially when capturing those little aerobatic planes high in the sky. And IQ between the two cameras is very close.

The most important benefit to me is how my keeper rate increased when using the 300 f2.8 IS II and 2xIII on the 80D. AF at 600 mm seems much improved over the 1D4. My current air show setup is the 300/2x/80D and Sigma 150-600 /1D4. This makes a pretty good pair.

Sadly, my other 1D4 doesn't see much use. I might have to find a new home for him.


My flickr albums (external link)
My Best Aviation Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
Avatar
7,710 posts
Likes: 2616
Joined Oct 2015
     
Nov 07, 2017 03:24 |  #23

CH_Devin wrote in post #18490527 (external link)
that sucks. i hope you feel better and make a full recovery.

Thanks. Working on it.


Tom

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
Avatar
7,710 posts
Likes: 2616
Joined Oct 2015
     
Nov 07, 2017 03:26 as a reply to  @ Perfectly Frank's post |  #24

Agreed. My80 has AF asGood as 1d4.


Tom

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CH_Devin
Senior Member
537 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 58
Joined Sep 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
     
Nov 07, 2017 04:17 |  #25

The main reason I got the 1D4 is that, when paired with the 24-70mm, or a lens like the 17-40mm, it gives me a range that I can't get on another body.


16-35mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phoenixkh
a mere speck
6,691 posts
Gallery: 63 photos
Likes: 1272
Joined May 2011
Location: Gainesville, Florida
     
Nov 07, 2017 11:45 |  #26

I'll probably pick up an 80D refurb for my wife in the not to distant future, so I'll be able to compare it first hand with my 1D IV's.

I went the opposite direction for now... bought a pristine 1D IV as a back up for now (come to think of it, I guess I did a parallel move instead). Man, I was shocked... it's like new.. not a scratch on it and it came packaged just like it was new as well. I still have to do the micro focusing adjustments on it, but I suspect, it won't need much unless I have the 1.4x teleconverter on.


Kim (the male variety) Canon 1DX2 | 1D IV | 16-35 f/4 IS | 24-105 f/4 IS | 100L IS macro | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 100-400Lii | 50 f/1.8 STM | Canon 1.4X III
RRS tripod and monopod | 580EXII | Cinch 1 & Loop 3 Special Edition | Editing Encouraged

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
THREAD ­ STARTER
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
48,408 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 4510
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
Post edited 8 months ago by CyberDyneSystems.
     
Nov 07, 2017 11:57 |  #27

CH_Devin wrote in post #18490599 (external link)
The main reason I got the 1D4 is that, when paired with the 24-70mm, or a lens like the 17-40mm, it gives me a range that I can't get on another body.


When I first went DSLR, APS-C was all that was available really, then I got my first 1D, and THAT was the "ff" option. (Of course 1Ds came along, but at $8K and slow frame rates, I was not interested.)

So the 1D 1.3x on all the 1D bodies up to the MkIV was THE sensor size for me from 2003 up to 2013 or so when I finally got a 5D3.

I still love the field of view ranges I get when I use the 1D4,. my widest remain wide enough, and my teles feel a bit longer. Both 5D3 and 7D2 were Canon's first real options in affordable FF and APS-C respectively that could compare favorably in performance to a 1D body. However, neither of those really left me feeling that the 1D4 was lacking. It was not until I traded the 5D3 for the 5D4 that I finally had a camera that left the 1D4 looking a little long in the tooth.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phoenixkh
a mere speck
6,691 posts
Gallery: 63 photos
Likes: 1272
Joined May 2011
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Post edited 8 months ago by Phoenixkh.
     
Nov 07, 2017 12:00 |  #28

It would be fun if Canon brought back the APS-H with the current technologies available.... with 1DX 2 and 5D IV sensor improvements... but APS-H. Of course, this isn't likely but it would still be fun.


Kim (the male variety) Canon 1DX2 | 1D IV | 16-35 f/4 IS | 24-105 f/4 IS | 100L IS macro | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 100-400Lii | 50 f/1.8 STM | Canon 1.4X III
RRS tripod and monopod | 580EXII | Cinch 1 & Loop 3 Special Edition | Editing Encouraged

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Magnus3D
Goldmember
Avatar
1,351 posts
Gallery: 154 photos
Likes: 688
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
     
Nov 07, 2017 13:43 |  #29

Thank you very much guys for all your replies, i appreciate it! after spending all day browsing trough the entire photo thread linked above i'm now convinced it performs very well. Sure it's no 1DX or 1DX2 but those cameras costs a lot more than this puppy. So i caved and placed my order on a used one in mint condition. It should be here on Thursday or Friday if all goes well with the lousy postal service.

/ Magnus


| Lots of cheap camera gear |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CH_Devin
Senior Member
537 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 58
Joined Sep 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
     
Nov 07, 2017 17:35 |  #30

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #18490902 (external link)
When I first went DSLR, APS-C was all that was available really, then I got my first 1D, and THAT was the "ff" option. (Of course 1Ds came along, but at $8K and slow frame rates, I was not interested.)

So the 1D 1.3x on all the 1D bodies up to the MkIV was THE sensor size for me from 2003 up to 2013 or so when I finally got a 5D3.

I still love the field of view ranges I get when I use the 1D4,. my widest remain wide enough, and my teles feel a bit longer. Both 5D3 and 7D2 were Canon's first real options in affordable FF and APS-C respectively that could compare favorably in performance to a 1D body. However, neither of those really left me feeling that the 1D4 was lacking. It was not until I traded the 5D3 for the 5D4 that I finally had a camera that left the 1D4 looking a little long in the tooth.

Fascinating.


16-35mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

10,937 views & 23 likes for this thread
Canon EOS 1D Mark IV, reviewed by CyberDyneSystems
FORUMS Gear Reviews Camera Reviews 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is RoydonsPhotography
540 guests, 409 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.