Yum. I wish my favorite seafood wasn’t so dang ugly.
I'm new to food photography, so C&C appreciated.
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
Feb 23, 2015 19:35 | #1 Yum. I wish my favorite seafood wasn’t so dang ugly. Image hosted by forum (714529) © grizzerbear [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Barry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OhLook insufferably pedantic. I can live with that. 24,813 posts Gallery: 105 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 16149 Joined Dec 2012 Location: California: SF Bay Area More info | Feb 23, 2015 19:58 | #2 Your subject is nicely framed and focused, and it renders the surfaces well. I wonder about the color, though. Was the scene so brown? It looks almost like a sepia monotone. PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa | Comments welcome
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 23, 2015 20:12 | #3 Thanks for taking the time to comment, OhLook. Barry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Feb 23, 2015 20:25 | #4 I am guessing that your white balance is off. If you have shot this in raw, go to the raw, and slide the color temp slider until the pics reflect what you remember of the colors. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OhLook insufferably pedantic. I can live with that. 24,813 posts Gallery: 105 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 16149 Joined Dec 2012 Location: California: SF Bay Area More info | Feb 23, 2015 20:27 | #5 TeamSpeed wrote in post #17446583 I am guessing that your white balance is off. If you have shot this in raw, go to the raw, and slide the color temp slider until the pics reflect what you remember of the colors. I am guessing further that the light on the oysters was dim originally. PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa | Comments welcome
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 24, 2015 02:36 | #6 I like this image as well and agree with the color temp comments. I think that a slightly cooler temp will bring a more natural appearance. The perspective is nice and the DOF works for me as well. Thanks for sharing. Lupo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 24, 2015 19:17 | #7 TeamSpeed wrote in post #17446583 I am guessing that your white balance is off. If you have shot this in raw, go to the raw, and slide the color temp slider until the pics reflect what you remember of the colors. OhLook wrote in post #17446585 I am guessing further that the light on the oysters was dim originally. Color sliders work on jpgs, too. Lupo-Lobo wrote in post #17446959 I like this image as well and agree with the color temp comments. I think that a slightly cooler temp will bring a more natural appearance. The perspective is nice and the DOF works for me as well. Thanks for sharing. Thank you, TeamSpeed, OhLook and Lupo-Lobo for your comments! I've already begun to experiment according to your suggestions! Barry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | Feb 24, 2015 19:28 | #8 White balance was apparently for Daylight, but lighting was indoor tungsten. In addition, photo was underexposed. I presume I have your OK to post a corrected version... You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oh man, Wilt. Not only is it o.k. to make corrections, I welcome them! Barry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OhLook insufferably pedantic. I can live with that. 24,813 posts Gallery: 105 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 16149 Joined Dec 2012 Location: California: SF Bay Area More info | Wilt, your version looks better, but don't the oysters still have an unrealistic red cast? PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa | Comments welcome
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info Post edited over 8 years ago by Wilt. (3 edits in all) | I merely adjusted the original JPG as far as i could adjust it with my post processing software, without storing an intermediate JPG so that I could try to adjust a second generation! You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1435 guests, 104 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||