so the wife is probably getting a camera to start learning. more than likely a crop sensor unless I get her a 5dc.
So now I am thinking since my 35mm f2 IS was 600, I could return it and get a used 16-35 MK I or II, 35mm art series (guess she wouldn't benefit from this change)
IQ and everything has been amazing with this lens while I've shot it but I know L quality build is always better and typically the glass is as well.
I have a few days left on my 30 day return policy.
I'm just trying to figure out if the 16-35mm MK I is on par with the 35mm f2 IS in IQ and stuff. I am mainly concerned about using a zoom lens at full zoom if anything will turn out soft.
I don't mind the f2 to f2.8 sacrifice. I bought this for a walking around portrait type of lens and now I'm thinking I may be better off with the 16-35 since its more multi purpose.
Then I could shoot HDR landscape and architecture as well.
Also, if my wife uses it she can actually use the 35mm ish focal length on her crop instead of the 50mm ish the 35 prime would be.
If its worth anything, I can put geeksquad on any piece of gear I own regardless of buying it from bestbuy and I can also insure it through USAA who replaces no questions asked at full retail price anytime I have an issue or my gear breaks.
/edit
I don't care about IS. Tripod+strobes+dont mess with low light or low shutter speed unless its long exposure
800 for used 16-35 and 1200 for 16-35 mk II

