Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 09 Mar 2015 (Monday) 08:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

55-250 STM with extender?

 
mamaof2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,361 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 95
Joined May 2014
     
Mar 09, 2015 08:25 |  #1

I just bought the 55-250 stm (it is my only lens that has reach). I was wondering if an extender would work to get more reach out of it?

thanks


Jessi
T4i/Nifty fifty/ 18-55/ DCR 250 macro attachment/ 55-250 stm/ Few old film lenses
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sploo
premature adulation
2,668 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 645
Joined Nov 2011
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
     
Mar 09, 2015 08:41 |  #2

Theoretically yes, practically... not really.

Extenders are for primes and top class zooms. The Canon extenders aren't listed as compatible with the 55-250, and I suspect the quality loss would be too high (assuming the AF even worked at all with one fitted).


Camera, some lenses, too little time, too little talent

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,946 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2873
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Mar 09, 2015 08:59 |  #3

mamaof2 wrote in post #17467105 (external link)
I just bought the 55-250 stm (it is my only lens that has reach). I was wondering if an extender would work to get more reach out of it?

thanks

Hi Jessi - I understand the urge to try to extend the reach...been there, done that ;-)a. Although I don't own that lens the physical compatibility issue is the main obstacle to this working unfortunately. The lens simply won't couple to the device. Here is one compatibility chart you may find helpful:

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …arts/canon2xExt​ender.html (external link)

Then there is the issue of "slowing" down the lens. At maximum zoom the largest aperture on your lens is f/5.6. Adding the 1.4 X Tele extender will cost you a stop, reducing that to f/8. If I'm doing my math correctly the 2x would cost you two stops, leaving you at f/8. While that is a great value lens you would need strong bright sun and good contrast to successfully get it to autofocus with all that extra glass. Other than that good luck with your shooting. :-)


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GeoKras1989
Goldmember
Avatar
4,038 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 262
Joined Jun 2014
     
Mar 09, 2015 09:02 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

typo: two stops = f/11


WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Poindexter
Senior Member
Avatar
717 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Likes: 270
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Vermont
Post edited over 8 years ago by Poindexter.
     
Mar 09, 2015 09:07 |  #5

sapearl wrote in post #17467150 (external link)
leaving you at f/8. While that is a great value lens you would need strong bright sun and good contrast to successfully get it to autofocus with all that extra glass. Other than that good luck with your shooting. :-)

Not to mention a camera body that autofocuses on f8 glass.

Looks like you've got this question out there a few times Jessi: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=17467124


flickr (external link) | SmugMug (external link) | Gear (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LJ3Jim
Goldmember
Avatar
1,653 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 3180
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
Mar 09, 2015 10:47 |  #6

mamaof2 wrote in post #17467105 (external link)
I just bought the 55-250 stm (it is my only lens that has reach). I was wondering if an extender would work to get more reach out of it?

thanks

Jessi - the extender won't work unless you try something weird (like putting an extension tube between the lens and extender). Even then, image quality is likely to be bad. In my opinion, an excellent inexpensive solution for more reach is a refurbished SX50HS for $230 from Canon. It's equivalent reach is 1200mm. Check out this thread for lots of examples of what that camera can do:

https://photography-on-the.net …read.php?t=1237​317&page=1


Image editing ok; C&C always welcome.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crofter
Senior Member
405 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 372
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Weardale UK
Post edited over 8 years ago by crofter.
     
Mar 09, 2015 11:08 |  #7

These new Kenko teleconverters are EF-S compatible but as said you'll lose autofocus and some IQ.
http://www.kenkoglobal​.com …lus_hd_dgx_14x_​canon.html (external link)


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/70718847@N02/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,946 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2873
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Mar 09, 2015 11:17 |  #8

GeoKras1989 wrote in post #17467153 (external link)
typo: two stops = f/11

Thanks very much for that correction - math was never my strong suit :-(. So basically the results would be even worse if the combination was mechanically possible.


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mamaof2
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,361 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 95
Joined May 2014
     
Mar 09, 2015 11:38 |  #9

Thank you all for your posts!


Jessi
T4i/Nifty fifty/ 18-55/ DCR 250 macro attachment/ 55-250 stm/ Few old film lenses
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bianchi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,764 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 29429
Joined Jan 2010
Location: USA
     
Mar 09, 2015 22:56 |  #10

Enjoy your sleeping gem of a lens.. I would not add an extender


My Gear flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Mar 10, 2015 11:05 |  #11

taking just a few steps closer to your subject can work wonders...assuming you can physically do it


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chexjc
Senior Member
Avatar
293 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 87
Joined Sep 2014
     
Mar 11, 2015 09:24 |  #12

LJ3Jim wrote in post #17467300 (external link)
Jessi - the extender won't work unless you try something weird (like putting an extension tube between the lens and extender). Even then, image quality is likely to be bad. In my opinion, an excellent inexpensive solution for more reach is a refurbished SX50HS for $230 from Canon. It's equivalent reach is 1200mm. Check out this thread for lots of examples of what that camera can do:

https://photography-on-the.net …read.php?t=1237​317&page=1

I've tried putting an extension tube between my Canon 1.4x and 100mm f2.8 macro, but I get an error about the camera being unable to communicate with the lens. Is there a workaround for that that anyone knows of?

BTW, Jessi, I'm glad you're enjoying the lens! ;-)a I've already started to miss it and I'm happy to hear it's getting good use!


Canon 6D x2 | 17-40L | Sigma 35 ART | 50mm f1.8 STM | 85mm f1.8 | 135L
Website (external link) | Instagram (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeleFragger
Goldmember
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 219
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Williamstown, NJ
     
Mar 11, 2015 09:37 |  #13

i have wondered stuff like this too... as I use the 55mm side on my crop and i also use the 250mm side.. and have to crop in... Travel Soccer.
I have thought of purchasing the 50-500 sigma as it would get me the reach I need but that is something for me later down the road.


GearBag - Feedback****Flickr - my playhouse (external link)****RF-603 Discussion
Canon 7Dm2 Gripped | 32GB Transcend CF | 64GB Toshiba FlashAir | YN-468 Flash | YN-468 II Flash | RF-603 | EF-S 18-55 IS|EF 24-105L|EF 50 MKII 1.8|EF-S 55-250 IS |EF 85 1.8| Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC |Primo's Trigger Stick Monopod | Manfrotto Carbon Fiber Tripod
if I post a pic.. it is there to be picked on... (I have thick skin.. im in IT)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Mar 11, 2015 10:21 |  #14

chexjc wrote in post #17470138 (external link)
I've tried putting an extension tube between my Canon 1.4x and 100mm f2.8 macro, but I get an error about the camera being unable to communicate with the lens. Is there a workaround for that that anyone knows of?

BTW, Jessi, I'm glad you're enjoying the lens! ;-)a I've already started to miss it and I'm happy to hear it's getting good use!

Are you using an extension tube with contacts? I've done that with my kenko 1.4, and it worked fine...at the very least you can tape the pins on the TC to avoid the error


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chexjc
Senior Member
Avatar
293 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 87
Joined Sep 2014
     
Mar 11, 2015 15:08 |  #15

DreDaze wrote in post #17470225 (external link)
Are you using an extension tube with contacts? I've done that with my kenko 1.4, and it worked fine...at the very least you can tape the pins on the TC to avoid the error

No, I'm not. I'm using $12 fotodiox tubes. That makes sense. I'll have to try taping the contacts! Thanks!


Canon 6D x2 | 17-40L | Sigma 35 ART | 50mm f1.8 STM | 85mm f1.8 | 135L
Website (external link) | Instagram (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

9,902 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it and it is followed by 7 members.
55-250 STM with extender?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1089 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.