I just bought the 55-250 stm (it is my only lens that has reach). I was wondering if an extender would work to get more reach out of it?
thanks
Mar 09, 2015 08:25 | #1 I just bought the 55-250 stm (it is my only lens that has reach). I was wondering if an extender would work to get more reach out of it? Jessi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sploo premature adulation More info | Mar 09, 2015 08:41 | #2 Theoretically yes, practically... not really. Camera, some lenses, too little time, too little talent
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sapearl Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 09, 2015 08:59 | #3 mamaof2 wrote in post #17467105 I just bought the 55-250 stm (it is my only lens that has reach). I was wondering if an extender would work to get more reach out of it? thanks Hi Jessi - I understand the urge to try to extend the reach...been there, done that GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 09, 2015 09:02 | #4 Permanent bantypo: two stops = f/11 WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Poindexter Senior Member More info Post edited over 8 years ago by Poindexter. | Mar 09, 2015 09:07 | #5 sapearl wrote in post #17467150 leaving you at f/8. While that is a great value lens you would need strong bright sun and good contrast to successfully get it to autofocus with all that extra glass. Other than that good luck with your shooting. ![]() Not to mention a camera body that autofocuses on f8 glass.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LJ3Jim Goldmember More info | Mar 09, 2015 10:47 | #6 mamaof2 wrote in post #17467105 I just bought the 55-250 stm (it is my only lens that has reach). I was wondering if an extender would work to get more reach out of it? thanks Jessi - the extender won't work unless you try something weird (like putting an extension tube between the lens and extender). Even then, image quality is likely to be bad. In my opinion, an excellent inexpensive solution for more reach is a refurbished SX50HS for $230 from Canon. It's equivalent reach is 1200mm. Check out this thread for lots of examples of what that camera can do: Image editing ok; C&C always welcome.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
crofter Senior Member More info Post edited over 8 years ago by crofter. | Mar 09, 2015 11:08 | #7 These new Kenko teleconverters are EF-S compatible but as said you'll lose autofocus and some IQ. http://www.flickr.com/photos/70718847@N02/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sapearl Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 09, 2015 11:17 | #8 GeoKras1989 wrote in post #17467153 typo: two stops = f/11 Thanks very much for that correction - math was never my strong suit GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 09, 2015 11:38 | #9 Thank you all for your posts! Jessi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 11, 2015 09:24 | #12 LJ3Jim wrote in post #17467300 Jessi - the extender won't work unless you try something weird (like putting an extension tube between the lens and extender). Even then, image quality is likely to be bad. In my opinion, an excellent inexpensive solution for more reach is a refurbished SX50HS for $230 from Canon. It's equivalent reach is 1200mm. Check out this thread for lots of examples of what that camera can do: https://photography-on-the.net …read.php?t=1237317&page=1 I've tried putting an extension tube between my Canon 1.4x and 100mm f2.8 macro, but I get an error about the camera being unable to communicate with the lens. Is there a workaround for that that anyone knows of? Canon 6D x2 | 17-40L | Sigma 35 ART | 50mm f1.8 STM | 85mm f1.8 | 135L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeleFragger Goldmember 3,188 posts Likes: 219 Joined Aug 2010 Location: Williamstown, NJ More info | Mar 11, 2015 09:37 | #13 i have wondered stuff like this too... as I use the 55mm side on my crop and i also use the 250mm side.. and have to crop in... Travel Soccer. GearBag - Feedback****Flickr - my playhouse
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid More info | Mar 11, 2015 10:21 | #14 chexjc wrote in post #17470138 I've tried putting an extension tube between my Canon 1.4x and 100mm f2.8 macro, but I get an error about the camera being unable to communicate with the lens. Is there a workaround for that that anyone knows of? BTW, Jessi, I'm glad you're enjoying the lens! I've already started to miss it and I'm happy to hear it's getting good use!Are you using an extension tube with contacts? I've done that with my kenko 1.4, and it worked fine...at the very least you can tape the pins on the TC to avoid the error Andre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 11, 2015 15:08 | #15 DreDaze wrote in post #17470225 Are you using an extension tube with contacts? I've done that with my kenko 1.4, and it worked fine...at the very least you can tape the pins on the TC to avoid the error No, I'm not. I'm using $12 fotodiox tubes. That makes sense. I'll have to try taping the contacts! Thanks! Canon 6D x2 | 17-40L | Sigma 35 ART | 50mm f1.8 STM | 85mm f1.8 | 135L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1089 guests, 119 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||