Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 14 Mar 2015 (Saturday) 15:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7D Mark II Surprise Exposure & WB shift

 
sagebrush
Member
158 posts
Joined Dec 2001
Post edited over 8 years ago by sagebrush.
     
Mar 14, 2015 15:39 |  #1

I've taken hundreds of shots with my 7D2 over the last few weeks of youth basketball in the same gym (lighting), same camera setup, and same lens (135mm f2.0). The results have been great. I shot AF using AL SERVO/ Hi Speed frame rate and at a burst of 2-6 frame/burst. However last week I started to notice a problem. A noticeable shift between shots while no change in lighting that could effect exposure or AWB. Does anyone have any ideas what might have caused this? Please see included meta data and photos. No post processing applied only converted RAW to JPG using Light Room 5.7

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/03/2/LQ_717573.jpg
Image hosted by forum (717573) © sagebrush [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/03/2/LQ_717574.jpg
Image hosted by forum (717574) © sagebrush [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MakisM1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,773 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Likes: 550
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Mar 14, 2015 15:46 |  #2

It looks like you are showing two sequential photos, taken at high FPS. The only change in the EXIF is the ISO (were you running AutoISO?). Then, it is likely the current frequency (60 hz).


Gerry
Canon R6 MkII/Canon 5D MkIII/Canon 60D/Canon EF-S 18-200/Canon EF 24-70L USM II/Canon EF 70-200L 2.8 USM II/Canon EF 50 f1.8 II/Σ 8-16/Σ 105ΕΧ DG/ 430 EXII
OS: Linux Ubuntu/PostProcessing: Darktable/Image Processing: GIMP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 416
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
Post edited over 8 years ago by msowsun. (4 edits in all)
     
Mar 14, 2015 16:00 |  #3

sagebrush wrote in post #17474939 (external link)
............... A noticeable shift between shots while no change in lighting that could effect exposure or AWB. Does anyone have any ideas what might have caused this? ...............

There is a change in lighting that is not visible to the human eye. Those gymnasium lights are flickering at about 60 (or 120?) cycles per second and that causes variation in both color temperature and light intensity.

If you didn't notice it before you were either very lucky or shooting at a slower shutter speed.

There really is no solution other than shooting a a slower shutting speed or correcting each frame in post processing.


Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lupo-Lobo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,103 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 420
Joined Nov 2013
Location: Texas
Post edited over 8 years ago by Lupo-Lobo. (2 edits in all)
     
Mar 14, 2015 16:09 |  #4

Check your "SHOOT4" settings on the camera and see what your "Anti-Flicker Shoot" setting is. If set to "Disable" then change to "Enable" and try again.

Anti-Flicker, when enabled, seems to control the issue you described pretty well.


Lupo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sagebrush
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
158 posts
Joined Dec 2001
     
Mar 14, 2015 16:10 as a reply to  @ MakisM1's post |  #5

Correct. I shot using AutoISO due to the sudden background change that can occur. And yes the ISO change between frames did change the expose but why the White Balance?

I set the lens wide open and shutter speed to 1/400 to freeze the action (most of the time). So your thinking the 60Hz electric power source to the gym lighting is causing this. Any other ideas out there??




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51000
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Mar 14, 2015 16:12 |  #6

Use the anti-flicker feature of the 7D2.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bumpintheroad
Self-inflicted bait
Avatar
1,692 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 352
Joined Oct 2013
Location: NJ, USA
Post edited over 8 years ago by bumpintheroad.
     
Mar 14, 2015 16:12 |  #7

What Mike said. But also, in most school gyms there's a mix of different types of light: high-pressure mercury, halogen, florescent, standard incandescent, even natural daylight from windows. The brightness and color balance can vary at any instant, and even within an individual frame.

The human eye and brain adapts, the eye constantly adjusts without conscious effort, the brain analyzes the individual elements and determines what's white versus red versus yellow and interprets the scene, even different parts of a scene. The camera runs on programming that adjust to an averaged view of the scene, and can't interpret what should be there, it only averages the light and color that falls within its metering pattern. The photographer's job is to turn the camera's "vision" into his own human interpretation.

It appears that the manual settings you're using are good, perhaps I'd dial-in +1/2 to +2/3 stop EC. Then let the camera decide the appropriate ISO and you deal with the color correction in post.


-- Mark | Gear | Flickr (external link) | Picasa (external link) | Youtube (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Image editing is okay

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 416
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
Post edited over 8 years ago by msowsun.
     
Mar 14, 2015 16:14 |  #8

Lupo-Lobo wrote in post #17474979 (external link)
Check your "SHOOT4" settings on the camera and see what your "Anti-Flicker Shoot" setting is. If set to "Disable" then change to "Enable" and try again.

Anti-Flicker, when enabled, seems to control the issue you described pretty well.

Good call! I forgot that the new 7D II has this new Anti-Flicker Mode. More info about it here: http://www.the-digital-picture.com …News-Post.aspx?News=13866 (external link)


Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sagebrush
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
158 posts
Joined Dec 2001
     
Mar 14, 2015 16:16 as a reply to  @ Archibald's post |  #9

Is there any down side to always keeping anti-flicker enabled for outdoors too?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51000
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
Post edited over 8 years ago by Archibald.
     
Mar 14, 2015 16:23 |  #10

sagebrush wrote in post #17474992 (external link)
Is there any down side to always keeping anti-flicker enabled for outdoors too?

I turned my anti-flicker on when the body was new and it has been on ever since. I haven't noticed any problems.

But the camera says it could delay the shutter. Maybe that's why I've been missing those BIF shots! -?


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Mar 14, 2015 16:33 |  #11

sagebrush wrote in post #17474992 (external link)
Is there any down side to always keeping anti-flicker enabled for outdoors too?

Not outdoors but keep in mind what canon reports with the anti-flicker option enabled 'the shutter release lag time may be longer. Also, the continuous shooting speed may become slightly slower, and the shooting interval may become irregular'. I messed around with the anti-flicker a little and did experience the irregular shooting interval mentioned. Ultimately I decided to keep it disabled because I'd rather deal with a little extra PP than having the camera act irregularly at a critical time.


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51000
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Mar 14, 2015 16:49 |  #12

nqjudo wrote in post #17475013 (external link)
Not outdoors but keep in mind what canon reports with the anti-flicker option enabled 'the shutter release lag time may be longer. Also, the continuous shooting speed may become slightly slower, and the shooting interval may become irregular'. I messed around with the anti-flicker a little and did experience the irregular shooting interval mentioned. Ultimately I decided to keep it disabled because I'd rather deal with a little extra PP than having the camera act irregularly at a critical time.

Well, at slower shutter speeds, you can get varying white balance in a picture, which is not easy to fix.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sagebrush
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
158 posts
Joined Dec 2001
     
Mar 14, 2015 17:00 as a reply to  @ Archibald's post |  #13

Thanks to all for your welcomed feedback.

I shoot wildlife and BIF just about all the time so will keep Anti-flicker off until the next opportunity I have for Indoor Sports.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MakisM1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,773 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Likes: 550
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Mar 14, 2015 17:08 as a reply to  @ sagebrush's post |  #14

The way I read it, the Anti-flicker kicks in only if flicker is detected. If it kicks in, you need it. If you don't need it, it will not kick in.

In addition, the 'cycle' is 1/100th or 1/120th of a second. The camera will delay a shot by a fraction of that fraction of a second. At the most half, means 1/200th delay. I don't think that there is a man alive that has reflexes that fast (including Mr. Hamilton flying low in Oz!... :-D) I don't think delay will be an issue, it may offset the timing of a high FPS series, but so what?


Gerry
Canon R6 MkII/Canon 5D MkIII/Canon 60D/Canon EF-S 18-200/Canon EF 24-70L USM II/Canon EF 70-200L 2.8 USM II/Canon EF 50 f1.8 II/Σ 8-16/Σ 105ΕΧ DG/ 430 EXII
OS: Linux Ubuntu/PostProcessing: Darktable/Image Processing: GIMP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Mar 14, 2015 18:09 |  #15

Archibald wrote in post #17475032 (external link)
Well, at slower shutter speeds, you can get varying white balance in a picture, which is not easy to fix.

With all the know how and tech around that enables is to fix issues of varying WB, different light sources, etc. it is indeed very easy to fix. A lot easier that re-creating a missed shot anyway.


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,869 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
7D Mark II Surprise Exposure & WB shift
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1210 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.