Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 15 Mar 2015 (Sunday) 08:33
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Sigma 18-35/1.8 as a kit-lens replacement?"
Yes! This lens is fantastic, buy it now!
15
93.8%
No! Stay as far away from this lens as possible
1
6.3%
It's ok but there are better options
0
0%

17 voters, 16 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Hesitant about Sigma 18-35

 
wanner
Member
52 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 12
Joined Jul 2013
Post edited over 8 years ago by wanner.
     
Mar 15, 2015 08:33 |  #1

A while back I bought a Sigma 17-50/2.8 to replace my kit lens as allround/walkaround lens to go with my 700D.
Sadly it suffered from focus issues (back/front) that was not resolved after being sent to Sigma for calibration so I decided to return the lens for store credit.
I'm now looking for another lens.

I am very interested in the Sigma 18-35 but i have some concerns and would love some input from those with experience.

1. I've read reports that the 18-35 suffers from auto focus issues? Is this something to be worried about?
I have no problem buying the USB-dock and doing some calibration, but if the AF misses there is really not much one can do?

2. How big of deal is the lack of image stabilization? I am mostly interested in still photography and not video.


https://www.flickr.com​/photos/malwan/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rebelsimon
Goldmember
Avatar
1,136 posts
Likes: 1995
Joined Nov 2013
Location: Whitby, ON
     
Mar 15, 2015 08:41 |  #2

While I had no problems with my 17-50, Sigma's ART series lenses are in a whole different class than their older stuff. My 18-35 has barely left my camera since I bought it, which seems to be pretty common. I haven't missed the IS, but who knows how you shoot. The only downside for me with this lens is the limited focal range,

If you google any lens/camera, your going to read about all the "issues" they have, it's the nature of the internet. Seems this is one of the least complained about lenses.


Toronto area photographer http://www.SimonMellic​kPhotography.com (external link)
Cameras:5Diii (x2), 70D
Lenses:Rokinon 14mm f2.8, Voightlander 20mm f3.5, Canon 24-70 f2.8ii, Tamron 35mm f1.8 VC, Canon 50mm STM, Tamron 90mm 2.8 VC, Canon 135mm f2
Lights: AD600, AD200 (x2), V850 (x4)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
Avatar
4,427 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 347
Joined Sep 2011
     
Mar 15, 2015 12:29 |  #3

If you get their adaptor puck that allows you to MFA, I think you would be OK. I have no problems with my 17-50 and it doesn't need any MFA, but with a 7D at least I have the option. That is why I would get the puck if you have a camera without that ability.


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mclaren777
Goldmember
Avatar
1,482 posts
Likes: 86
Joined May 2012
Location: Olympia, WA
     
Mar 15, 2015 14:42 |  #4

I have two friends who each own the 18-35mm and it's a fantastic lens.

If you're worried about AF issues, just buy the $30 USB base and tweak it until you're happy.


A simple comparison of sensor technology: Nikon vs. Canon (external link)
A technical comparison of sensor technology: Exposure Latitude (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wanner
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
52 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 12
Joined Jul 2013
     
Mar 15, 2015 16:09 |  #5

mclaren777 wrote in post #17476194 (external link)
I have two friends who each own the 18-35mm and it's a fantastic lens.

If you're worried about AF issues, just buy the $30 USB base and tweak it until you're happy.

My concern is that there will be issues with AF and that the lens misses focus, something not correctable by the dock.


https://www.flickr.com​/photos/malwan/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnandbentley
Senior Member
Avatar
947 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 193
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Twin Cities
     
Mar 15, 2015 16:20 |  #6

Its a great lens. I had one and sold it after moving to a FF camera. I even used it at 35mm on my FF. Either body, images were super sharp and good AF.


6D, Sigma 24mm f1.4 art, sigma 85 f1.4 art

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mclaren777
Goldmember
Avatar
1,482 posts
Likes: 86
Joined May 2012
Location: Olympia, WA
     
Mar 15, 2015 16:27 |  #7

Would the store let you test out this lens in the store? Spend 5-10 minutes walking around to see if you like it?

That should be enough time to decide if you can trust its AF tendencies.


A simple comparison of sensor technology: Nikon vs. Canon (external link)
A technical comparison of sensor technology: Exposure Latitude (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlakeC
"Dad was a meat cutter"
Avatar
2,673 posts
Gallery: 372 photos
Likes: 684
Joined Jul 2014
Location: West Michigan, USA
     
May 05, 2015 10:24 |  #8

johnandbentley wrote in post #17476307 (external link)
Its a great lens. I had one and sold it after moving to a FF camera. I even used it at 35mm on my FF. Either body, images were super sharp and good AF.

How did you use it on a FF? It's a crop censor only lens.


Blake C
BlakeC-Photography.com (external link)
Follow Me on Facebook (external link) , Instagram (external link), or Google+ (external link)
80D |70D | SL1 - Σ 18-35 1.8 ART, Σ 50-100 1.8 ART, Σ 17-50 2.8, Canon 24 2.8 Pancake, Canon 50 1.8 STM, Canon 10-18 STM, Canon 18-135 STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gremlin75
Goldmember
Avatar
2,738 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 226
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
     
May 05, 2015 11:31 |  #9

wanner wrote in post #17476291 (external link)
My concern is that there will be issues with AF and that the lens misses focus, something not correctable by the dock.

Front or back focusing is corrected via the dock. Mine needed a bit of adjustment but it had been perfect since. The 18-35 is an amazing lens. Fast, sharp, fast AF, and well built. If you're ok with the focal tenge of it Id say pick one up!

BlakeC wrote in post #17544430 (external link)
How did you use it on a FF? It's a crop censor only lens.

It's designed for crop sensor but it will mount to a ff body as well. It will have vignetting in the wider focal length but that disappears as you near the long end of the lens.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlakeC
"Dad was a meat cutter"
Avatar
2,673 posts
Gallery: 372 photos
Likes: 684
Joined Jul 2014
Location: West Michigan, USA
     
May 05, 2015 11:38 |  #10

gremlin75 wrote in post #17544510 (external link)
Front or back focusing is corrected via the dock. Mine needed a bit of adjustment but it had been perfect since. The 18-35 is an amazing lens. Fast, sharp, fast AF, and well built. If you're ok with the focal tenge of it Id say pick one up!

It's designed for crop sensor but it will mount to a ff body as well. It will have vignetting in the wider focal length but that disappears as you near the long end of the lens.

Wow...i was literally JUST ready this on another review! lol


Blake C
BlakeC-Photography.com (external link)
Follow Me on Facebook (external link) , Instagram (external link), or Google+ (external link)
80D |70D | SL1 - Σ 18-35 1.8 ART, Σ 50-100 1.8 ART, Σ 17-50 2.8, Canon 24 2.8 Pancake, Canon 50 1.8 STM, Canon 10-18 STM, Canon 18-135 STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PineBomb
I have many notable flaws
Avatar
2,878 posts
Gallery: 234 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3143
Joined Apr 2014
Location: USA
     
May 05, 2015 11:48 as a reply to  @ BlakeC's post |  #11

I could use it between 28 and 35mm on my 5d3. There was some noticeable vignetting at 28, but it was still useable.

To the OP, I highly recommend getting the USB dock with the 18-35. I had this lens when I was shooting a 7d. It took some trial and error with the adjustments, but I dialed it in after my second attempt. Back button focus will also help.


-Matt
Website (external link) | flickr (external link) | instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M_Six
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,845 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Dec 2010
Location: East Central IL
     
May 05, 2015 12:52 |  #12

The lens is awesome. I've had a few shots that didn't turn out as sharp as I'd like, but when I used DPP to locate the focus point, I realized that I'd missed my intended focus point and hit something just past it. Couple that with a very thin DoF at f1.8, and you'll get shots that are less sharp than you thought they'd be. I have several Sigma lenses and the USB adapter. I haven't had to use it on the 18-35, though.

This was shot with the 18-35 wide open on an SL1 body.

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7434/15794706273_4d05e1473e_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/q4HZ​TX  (external link) Holy Name Cathedral (external link) by Mark J Photography (external link), on Flickr

Mark J.
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gremlin75
Goldmember
Avatar
2,738 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 226
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
     
May 05, 2015 14:33 |  #13

When in doubt check out the reviews for the 18-35. I don't think I've seen anything but great reviews for it so far.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
troehr
Goldmember
1,061 posts
Likes: 482
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand
     
May 06, 2015 10:43 as a reply to  @ gremlin75's post |  #14

The 18-35 never leaves my camera. I have had no focus issues at all. I think a lot of the focus issues come from people using f1.8 for the first time. Shallow depth of field is a new thing to these people and is often said to be focus issues.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elliott44k
Member
30 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2010
     
May 09, 2015 12:29 |  #15
bannedPermanent ban

Don't think, just get it. If anything, just rent it first if you're so worried.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,519 views & 3 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it and it is followed by 10 members.
Hesitant about Sigma 18-35
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
1282 guests, 126 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.