Ultrazoom lens for FF (6D)

Arturasz wrote in post #17493826
But I am addicted to full frame quality ...

BTW, returend form my shop tested Tamron 28-300 PZD against my 24-105 + 100-400. Strangely Tamron holds very well in 50-100-200-300 mm range, but on 28 mm it is simply BS, and wide is most used FL in journeys. So decided to stat with current setup.

Thanks for noting.

A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

GeoKras1989 wrote in post #17493252
sx50

Exactly. Hooking up a cheap lens to a nice, modern FF body will yield the same quality as something like the SX50. I would have one but bought a S100 instead because I really wanted something pocketable. Bought my mom an SX something years ago, they are nice little cameras.

Talley wrote in post #17493841
Thanks for noting.

Ditto for your post.

PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

1DX, 5DSR, 6D, 7D Mark II, 1D Mark III & too many lens to list ... I am serious lensoholic
Arturasz Photography

Arturasz wrote in post #17493890
I meant that I like FF RAW file procesing capabilities

I believe that the SX50 will shoot in RAW and I know that the SX60 will. All ithe G series are able to.

PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

Left Handed Brisket wrote in post #17493906
I believe that the SX50 will shoot in RAW and I know that the SX60 will. All ithe G series are able to.

sx50 also wont get close to the IQ of a 28-300L, 35-300L, or nikon 28-300G. Those lenses actually perform well.

Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

Charlie wrote in post #17493925
sx50 also wont get close to the IQ of a 28-300L, 35-300L, or nikon 28-300G. Those lenses actually perform well.

in post 17 i was comparing the advanced point and shoot SX line to a CHEAP super zoom.

everyone has a different idea of cheap, but $2600 for the 28-300L? congrats if you see that as cheap.

PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

1DX, 5DSR, 6D, 7D Mark II, 1D Mark III & too many lens to list ... I am serious lensoholic
Arturasz Photography