5D Mark III and 2 lenses....17-40 f/4 L, 24-105 f/4 L IS and the 70-200 f/4 l IS.

Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, 7D (x2) BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer

Nick5 wrote in post #17494600
Am traveling for a quick trip to Michigan State in Lansing MI. As hard as it is for me who does not travel light, I am going to take 2 of the three above. Love to hear your thoughts.

Heya,

17-40 & 70-200 for me.

I see no reason to have 41~69mm, when you have 40mm and 70mm, but have the option for 17mm and 200mm as the compromise losing 41~69.

Very best,

My Flickr :: My Astrobin

Permanent ban

WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!

GeoKras1989 wrote in post #17494846
Agree with Malveax, no need for the 24-105. Maybe the 50 1.4?

Yea, this is what I do, the 50 is so light I throw it in.

Edward Jenner
5DIV, M6, GX1 II, Sig15mm FE, 16-35 F4,TS-E 17, TS-E 24, 35 f2 IS, M11-22, M18-150 ,24-105, T45 1.8VC, 70-200 f4 IS, 70-200 2.8 vII, Sig 85 1.4, 100L, 135L, 400DOII.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/48305795@N03/
https://www.facebook.c​om/edward.jenner.372/p​hotos

-Matt
Website | flickr | instagram