Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 27 Feb 2006 (Monday) 10:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Dragging the shutter, thoughts.

 
Samiad
Senior Member
Avatar
473 posts
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Cardiff, UK
     
Feb 27, 2006 10:32 |  #1

I've been thinking a lot about flash photography lately, it represents something of a dark art for me. I understand the theory behind it, it isn't too complicated. I do struggle with quick situations where I have to work out settings FAST to take a good photo. There are a lot of things to consider with regard to accurate flash exposure, for foreground and background. Not to mention ALL the standard photography rules, about focus technique, and composition.

So, with dragging the shutter, imagine the following situation. The background meters at 1/20 at, say, f/4. The foreground (perhaps a person) is also registering 1/20 at f/4, so we have quite an even situation, 1/20 @ f/4 will perfectly expose everything.

In situations like this (foreground and background equal light), is dragging the shutter possible? I see the following possibilites.

1 - You expose at 1/20 @ f/4 and fill flash....the background exposes perfectly, the flash will kick out hardly ANY power at all (because the subject is already going to be exposed nicely at 1/20, f/4). As such, the foreground subject is exposed well, but a bit blurry because of camera shake (due to 1/20).

2 - You decide to either increase shutter speed or close down the aperture (e.g. 1/60 at f/4) - so effectively you reduce ambient light coming to the lens. This means the flash will have more impact and weight, but the end result is an underexposed background, and perfectly exposed and sharp foreground.

It's a basic view of what might happen, but it's just something I was thinking about today. Obviously the best option is (2), because you do get a useable photo. So is it a fair thing so say that if your foreground subject and background are metering identically, then you can't really get much success at 'dragging the shutter'? Dragging the shutter is only a possibility when the background ambient lighting is brighter than your foreground ambient lighting?

Or, you could read all this and decide to ignore the inane ramblings of somebody bored at work.

The ultimate aim is for me to know exactly what my camera is going to do, rather than be reactive to what it actually does when I try it.


Digital Photography
http://www.samiad.co.u​k/gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lime
Member
247 posts
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Orange County So. Cal.
     
Feb 27, 2006 10:45 |  #2

Read this thread, lots of info.
https://photography-on-the.net …p?t=138130&high​light=lime


Happy Shooting!
Gear List
https://photography-on-the.net …?p=7078185&post​count=1573

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,472 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4574
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Feb 27, 2006 11:20 |  #3

>>2 - You decide to either increase shutter speed or close down the aperture (e.g. 1/60 at f/4) - so effectively you reduce ambient light coming to the lens. This means the flash will have more impact and weight, but the end result is an underexposed background, and perfectly exposed and sharp foreground.<<

Alternative 3: You do not need to fully see the background brightly in the photo, but you can capture it in a subdued manner, with existing lighting (e.g. recessed lighting) providing better lit areas within the background area and providing ambience. So you set the lens to f/5.6 and drag the shutter at 1/20, but the flash fires and provides the lighting for a correctly lit main subject.


>> So is it a fair thing so say that if your foreground subject and background are metering identically, then you can't really get much success at 'dragging the shutter'? <<
Nope, wrong assessment. See my Alternative 3.

>>Dragging the shutter is only a possibility when the background ambient lighting is brighter than your foreground ambient lighting?<<
Nope not at all. Dragging the shutter applies any time the background is dimly lit, regardless of the relative brightness of the subject, where the flash 'takes care of' the subject, and the background gets captured by the use of a slow shutter speed in combination with appropriage f/stop using ambient light.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,472 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4574
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Feb 27, 2006 11:22 |  #4

Apologies...I realized, after the post, that my Alternative 3 was described adequately in the general Alternative 2 description of the OP.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Samiad
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
473 posts
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Cardiff, UK
     
Feb 27, 2006 11:24 |  #5

Hi Wilt,

Your alternative 3 is the same as my alternative 2 - you are reducing the ambient light entering the lens. It's just that I used shutter as an example, you use aperture - the end result is the same.

Also my question "Dragging the shutter is only a possibility when the background ambient lighting is brighter than your foreground ambient lighting?" should actually read,

"Dragging the shutter with acceptable results is only a possibility when the background ambient lighting is brighter than your foreground ambient lighting?"

For this (deeply) theoretical situtation I am assuming that we want the background perfectly exposed, not underexposed/subdued at all.


Digital Photography
http://www.samiad.co.u​k/gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Samiad
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
473 posts
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Cardiff, UK
     
Feb 27, 2006 11:25 |  #6

Hehe too quick to reply!


Digital Photography
http://www.samiad.co.u​k/gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Samiad
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
473 posts
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Cardiff, UK
     
Feb 27, 2006 11:29 |  #7

I've read the thread above, it actually started to get me thinking, so I took some test shots myself.

As I said in my first post, the ultimate result is having perfect knowledge of what the camera is going to result in - that is the goal.

I figure critical assessment is needed immediately prior to taking the photo. As a photographer you must ascertain the relative lighting of foreground to background to know fully what is going to happen.

If the foreground subject is brighter than the background (maybe only slightly), then you are going to have a very hard time getting a properly exposed background in your picture, without sacrificing the foreground. It's this sort of knowledge that I am hoping to make second nature so that less time is spent wasting effort in certain photographic situations. It sounds obvious, and it is, but without explicitly looking out and accounting for a situation like this, I would waste a shot (not a problem) and potentially waste an opportunity (big big problem!).


Digital Photography
http://www.samiad.co.u​k/gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,472 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4574
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Feb 27, 2006 11:29 |  #8

>>"Dragging the shutter with acceptable results is only a possibility when the background ambient lighting is brighter than your foreground ambient lighting?"
For this (deeply) theoretical situtation I am assuming that we want the background perfectly exposed, not underexposed/subdued at all.<<

Yup, if the BG level was same as FG level, if you dragged the shutter, there is really no point to using the flash (since the FG would be as properly exposed as the BG) other than to open up shadows cast on the fast (in which case it would be called 'fill flash' not 'dragging the shutter')


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,472 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4574
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Feb 27, 2006 11:30 |  #9

>>other than to open up shadows cast on the fast <<

Typing too fast "other than to open up shadows cast on the FACE"


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,727 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Dragging the shutter, thoughts.
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
998 guests, 103 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.