speedync Goldmember More info Post edited over 8 years ago by speedync. | Apr 07, 2015 19:35 | #16 As long as the lens is up to it. I've experimented with my old 24 2.8 on both my 6D & EOS M. It looks lovely on the 6D, a bit ugly on the M as soon as you zoom/crop a bit. I guess that's why Canon has updated a few of the L's lately, ready for the 5Ds.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LJ3Jim Goldmember  More info | Apr 07, 2015 20:40 | #17 C Scott IV wrote in post #17508540  I'm fairly happy with the 7D for wildlife but it frustrates me with landscapes. Are you happy with the 7D2 for landscapes? Image editing ok; C&C always welcome.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 08, 2015 02:35 | #18 Ray.Petri wrote in post #17508109 'ere we go again - well done CDS - you have stated what I have always said - but have been afraid of getting shouted down. For many, many years I've been posting this link - The Understated Utility of Smaller Pixels - whenever this topic crops up. Daniel Browning is a very clever guy who can clearly put forward his point of view, backing it up with logic and examples. What he wrote was true in 2009 and remains true today. Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pentax1 Member 70 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2011 More info | Apr 08, 2015 04:04 | #19 I'm surprised some people find this a revaluation.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pondrader "now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"  16,028 posts Gallery: 2548 photos Best ofs: 5 Likes: 57084 Joined Aug 2012 Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada More info | Apr 08, 2015 06:31 | #20 Couldn't agree more Jake and in super bad light is where we who shoot wildlife live. Last night I shot this Barred, The light was gone and I mean gone. Here is a big crop and the image I cropped it from. Remember this is an extreme darkness example and hand held  Image hosted by forum (721777) © Pondrader [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.  Image hosted by forum (721778) © Pondrader [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pondrader "now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two" 16,028 posts Gallery: 2548 photos Best ofs: 5 Likes: 57084 Joined Aug 2012 Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada More info | Apr 08, 2015 06:33 | #21 The histogram  Image hosted by forum (721779) © Pondrader [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeleFragger Goldmember  3,188 posts Likes: 219 Joined Aug 2010 Location: Williamstown, NJ More info | Apr 08, 2015 06:44 | #22 johnf3f wrote in post #17508494 Interesting CDS. To date I have found that a cropped FF image (18mp 1DX) has given up very little, if anything, to crop sensors. I have had the the chance to play with a couple of 7D2 cameras and quite like them - but I have yet to really ring them out and see what they will do in the real world when cropped heavily. I would be interested in your observations as to crop-ability and (more importantly) ISO performance as I am often at 3200 to 12800 ISO. Just for a giggle I have attached a silly crop of some thing I saw a couple of days ago. I spotted a guy using a 5D (Mk2 or 3) on a long pole 1/2 a mile or more away. Note this is totally un-edited/sharpened but he is definitely using a Canon 24-70 F2.8 (Mk1). Low MP sensors (18mp FF) still have their place! Not too bad for 1000 or so yards and un-sharpened on a hazy day, even though it was taken with an 800mm lens.
GearBag - Feedback****Flickr - my playhouse
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 08, 2015 07:45 | #23 I used a 7D for 5 years, and was quite satisfied, but in my experience the 7D2 allows for more cropping while maintaining detail and quality. I know that there are a number of important changes in the 7D2, but I attribute a lot of the improvement to the AF system. Cropping a just-out-of-focus image isn't going to look good, but if the focus has been nailed, you can crop substantially and get good results. Digital EOS 90D Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pondrader "now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two" 16,028 posts Gallery: 2548 photos Best ofs: 5 Likes: 57084 Joined Aug 2012 Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada More info | I don't think Jake think's having input is clutter Jeff, this is a all about the image site lol ... post away Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeleFragger Goldmember 3,188 posts Likes: 219 Joined Aug 2010 Location: Williamstown, NJ More info Post edited over 8 years ago by TeleFragger. | Apr 08, 2015 10:28 | #25 Pondrader wrote in post #17509055 I don't think Jake think's having input is clutter Jeff, this is a all about the image site lol ... post away
 ISO 16,000 24-105L Just playing around. Straight out of camera by TeleFragger / RootBreaker, on Flickr Cropped by TeleFragger / RootBreaker, on Flickrso how do others add this part? i did a screenshot, crop, upload to flickr. can you do this straight from flickr?  Cat by TeleFragger / RootBreaker, on FlickrGearBag - Feedback****Flickr - my playhouse
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jay125 the title fairy put me in therapy  More info |
TeleFragger Goldmember 3,188 posts Likes: 219 Joined Aug 2010 Location: Williamstown, NJ More info | yeah i know that but i have seen others where they post the pic like i did so you dont have to go those extra steps.. hah... GearBag - Feedback****Flickr - my playhouse
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jay125 the title fairy put me in therapy More info |
TeleFragger Goldmember 3,188 posts Likes: 219 Joined Aug 2010 Location: Williamstown, NJ More info | Apr 08, 2015 11:12 | #29 jay125 wrote in post #17509229 Ah...ok then. I've never done that so if there is a trick to it, I'm not aware of it. 
GearBag - Feedback****Flickr - my playhouse
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 08, 2015 12:17 | #30 TeleFragger wrote in post #17509000 wow well all i can say is I dont think anyone is gonna say get rid of your 1dx... hah... i look at the 7dm2 as the camera where I cant afford a 1d. Just like a camaro is a married guy with kids car and vette is the no kids can ride in here car! you say.... and (more importantly) ISO performance as I am often at 3200 to 12800 ISO. i can tell you I am blown away by the high(er) ISO i am using with my 7dm2 over my t2i. if you would like I can post a pic of my cat when I was messing around and pic is 10,000 or higher.. I forget but wont post unless requested to not clutter up OP's thread... Those images look better than I would have expected. I will have to see if a local 7D2 owner will let me put my card in and give one a try! Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is johntmyers418 1071 guests, 181 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
