^- how is the MT-24EX? better than doing one of these rigs?
KenjiS "Holy crap its long!" More info | ^- how is the MT-24EX? better than doing one of these rigs? Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
troypiggo Goldmember 4,743 posts Likes: 172 Joined Jun 2007 Location: Brisbane, AUSTRALIA More info | Sep 26, 2010 03:02 | #632 I love the mt24ex, but definitely needs diffusing "Interesting. You're afraid of insects and women. Ladybugs must render you catatonic." - Sheldon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben_r_ -POTN's Three legged Support- 15,894 posts Likes: 13 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Sep 29, 2010 16:22 | #633 Interesting, never seen the UltraBounce diffusers before. Too bad they cover the "modeling light". [Gear List | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
troypiggo Goldmember 4,743 posts Likes: 172 Joined Jun 2007 Location: Brisbane, AUSTRALIA More info | Sep 29, 2010 17:45 | #634 I've never used the modelling light, so don't know what I'm missing out on. "Interesting. You're afraid of insects and women. Ladybugs must render you catatonic." - Sheldon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben_r_ -POTN's Three legged Support- 15,894 posts Likes: 13 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Sep 30, 2010 14:38 | #635 Really?! So how can you see anything at 5x on the MP-E 65?! Unless Im shooting in way bright sunlight I cant see anything at around 3.5x+ magnification! [Gear List | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
troypiggo Goldmember 4,743 posts Likes: 172 Joined Jun 2007 Location: Brisbane, AUSTRALIA More info | Sep 30, 2010 15:07 | #636 I've mainly used it only up to around 3:1. On the few occasions I've gone higher and up to 5:1, I guess the ambient was bright enough. I definitely did notice it was darker and it wasn't easy, but I made do. Now you've got me intrigued and I must have a play with the modelling lights at these higher mags to see how much better it is. I asked you not to tell me what I'm missing... "Interesting. You're afraid of insects and women. Ladybugs must render you catatonic." - Sheldon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben_r_ -POTN's Three legged Support- 15,894 posts Likes: 13 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Sep 30, 2010 15:33 | #637 troypiggo wrote in post #11009482 I've mainly used it only up to around 3:1. On the few occasions I've gone higher and up to 5:1, I guess the ambient was bright enough. I definitely did notice it was darker and it wasn't easy, but I made do. Now you've got me intrigued and I must have a play with the modelling lights at these higher mags to see how much better it is. I asked you not to tell me what I'm missing... ![]() Does make you respect guys like LordV who just use speedlites on a bracket even more. ie no way of modelling lights and he shoots at 5:1 more times in a month than I would in a lifetime I reckon. Yea the modeling lamps are not very bright, but they do really help when at the higher magnifications. [Gear List | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheRan Goldmember 1,555 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2010 Location: Hertford, England More info | Oct 18, 2010 12:43 | #638 Here's my setup: 20D on some old BPM bellows (40-150mm) with a Yashica 50mm f/2.8 enlarger lens taped to the front mount (the lens has a 52mm screw thread and I don't think the right mount will be easy to find). Maximum magnification is about 3.75:1, so 6mm fills a whole APS-C frame horizontally. This is what I've got with it so far: The bug's head is about a millimetre or so wide, so it's a really tiny bug. I'm also using a little LED torch for lighting and a focussing aid at the moment as my PC sync cable only works intermittently.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
howzitboy Goldmember 2,948 posts Joined May 2007 Location: Hawaii More info | Oct 21, 2010 14:19 | #639
how bout some oldie but goodie! got these bellows long ago but never used them because i couldnt find the double cable release ... or was i too lazy to look.. http://onehourwedding.blogspot.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LesterWareham Moderator More info | Oct 22, 2010 07:06 | #640 troypiggo wrote in post #11003327 I've never used the modelling light, so don't know what I'm missing out on. Sssh, don't tell me. ![]() ben_r_ wrote in post #11009285 Really?! So how can you see anything at 5x on the MP-E 65?! Unless Im shooting in way bright sunlight I cant see anything at around 3.5x+ magnification! +1 My Photography Home Page
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lexanite Member 31 posts Likes: 4 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Indonesia More info | My macro gear 7D, 5D3, 60D, D70s, Fuji X100, Oly XZ1, Sigma 50/1.4 ART, EF 100 /2.8 macro, EFs 60/2.8 macro, EF 17-40/4L, EF 24-105/4L IS, EF 70-200 F/2.8L IS, EF 70-200 F/4L IS, EF 10-22/3.5, EF85/F1.8, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma EX 80-400 /4.5 OS APO DG. Sekonic L-308S, Helios 58/2, Tak 55/2, Tak 50/1.4, Zeiss Pancolar 50/1.8, Zeiss N-Mirotar 210mm/0.03, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tak 135/3.5, Zeiss Biometar 80/2.8, William Optic Megrez72.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lexanite Member 31 posts Likes: 4 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Indonesia More info | Oct 26, 2010 07:43 | #642 7D, 5D3, 60D, D70s, Fuji X100, Oly XZ1, Sigma 50/1.4 ART, EF 100 /2.8 macro, EFs 60/2.8 macro, EF 17-40/4L, EF 24-105/4L IS, EF 70-200 F/2.8L IS, EF 70-200 F/4L IS, EF 10-22/3.5, EF85/F1.8, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma EX 80-400 /4.5 OS APO DG. Sekonic L-308S, Helios 58/2, Tak 55/2, Tak 50/1.4, Zeiss Pancolar 50/1.8, Zeiss N-Mirotar 210mm/0.03, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tak 135/3.5, Zeiss Biometar 80/2.8, William Optic Megrez72.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
A lousy picture of my T1i (500D), and (from right to left) an FD mount 100mm macro, FD-to-EOS adapter, and two sets of $8 tubes. I normally only use 1 set, but was playing around tonight. I also have a bellows that I rarely use any more. Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Now, I'm going totally overboard with extensions; I added my bellows to the middle of the rig: The tubes, bellows and adapters total about 13" of extension (33cm) And I still have close to 4" (10cm) of working distance with the lens fully extended: And here is the final result: this is in Times Roman 12pt font, which measures ~4.2mm tall. That makes the magnification on my crop sensor ~3.5x, which is pretty close to what you would expect just doing the math. I'm totally amazed how sharp it is in the piece that is in focus; I guess all that air doesn't hurt the image much . It is showing ink droplets that are too small to see by eye, even for someone as near-sighted as me (which is saying a lot). It also shows the microscopic DOF; I had the paper as flat and square as I could get it by eye, and you can still see the focus rolling off toward the top and bottom of the character:Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 28, 2010 20:28 | #645 Thats pretty cool ^
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1310 guests, 181 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||