Hi guys, anyone have both these lenses and can tell me how the compare at 24mm?
The canon is cheaper, but the Tamron covers a larger focal range.
Attaching to my 100D.
Cheers.
EDIT: I'd prefer to compare to the non VC now i've seen reviews!
kkerry.photo Member  More info Post edited over 8 years ago by kkerry.photo. | Apr 16, 2015 04:03 | #1 Hi guys, anyone have both these lenses and can tell me how the compare at 24mm? The Gear: Canon 60D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
msowsun "approx 8mm"  More info Post edited over 8 years ago by msowsun. (2 edits in all) | Apr 16, 2015 06:47 | #2 According to The-Digital-Picture.com: http://www.the-digital-picture.com …omp=0&FLIComp=1&APIComp=0 Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 16, 2015 07:52 | #3 I have the Tamron 17-50 non vc. It's really a great lens. Do a search, I remember when buying it, the consensus was that the non-vc was actually a better, sharper lens than the vc version, which is why I bought the non vc. I have a 22mm on my m. Personally, while the lens is razor sharp, I feel it's a little wide as something you would walk around with all the time. _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1306 guests, 147 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
