Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 19 Apr 2015 (Sunday) 11:11
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Milky Way.

 
Varneeezy
Senior Member
Avatar
379 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2014
Location: Bakersfield Ca.
     
Apr 19, 2015 11:11 |  #1

First time shooting the Milky Way this morning. Cc appreciated.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/04/3/LQ_723536.jpg
Image hosted by forum (723536) © Varneeezy [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/04/3/LQ_723537.jpg
Image hosted by forum (723537) © Varneeezy [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jsecordphoto
In disbelief of how amazing I am
Avatar
257 posts
Likes: 161
Joined Aug 2014
Location: New Hampshire
     
Apr 19, 2015 14:49 |  #2

Not bad, especially for your first attempt. White balance is a little too purple for me. Not sure what lens you are using but it looks very soft in the corners. Also, I would've reshot the frame with the plane or satellite going through it.


Nikon D750, Nikon 50 f1.8, Tokina 16-28 f2.8, Tamron 150-600
www.jsecordphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Micro5797
Senior Member
Avatar
488 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 160
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Montana
Post edited over 8 years ago by Micro5797. (4 edits in all)
     
Apr 19, 2015 23:28 as a reply to  @ jsecordphoto's post |  #3

The first image is the space station, i assume that that is why it was left in there.

As far as WB, keep in mind that this is the trail of the Aurora Borealis so the night sky is still a little purple.

@Varneeezy. It is a descent enough capture, though i would try to take a slightly faster shutter (up to 5 seconds) to try to get better pin point stars, opening the aperture or going wider does the same, though i am sure you are maxed out on your lens.. Also, to really make your images stand out, i would work towards finding a stronger foreground, rather than just a standard tree line.

Also, be sure to check out the celestial forum. https://photography-on-the.net/forum/forumdis​play.php?f=136


_______________
Canon 70D | 70-200mm f2.8 MK1 | 85mm f1.8 | 50mm f1.8 | Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 non vc| Nissin Di866 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Varneeezy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
379 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2014
Location: Bakersfield Ca.
     
Apr 19, 2015 23:37 |  #4

Micro5797 wrote in post #17524489 (external link)
The first image is the space station, i assume that that is why it was left in there.

As far as WB, keep in mind that this is the trail of the Aurora Borealis so the night sky is still a little purple.

@Varneeezy. It is a descent enough capture, though i would try to take a slightly faster shutter (up to 5 seconds) to try to get better pin point stars, opening the aperture or going wider does the same, though i am sure you are maxed out on your lens.. Also, to really make your images stand out, i would work towards finding a stronger foreground, rather than just a standard tree line.

Thanks. Ya I wanted to find a better foreground but thought I'd focus more on getting the stars right first. I guess I did a little too long of an exposure? 30seconds at 2500iso. I was at f4 at 10mm too.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jsecordphoto
In disbelief of how amazing I am
Avatar
257 posts
Likes: 161
Joined Aug 2014
Location: New Hampshire
     
Apr 20, 2015 06:45 as a reply to  @ Micro5797's post |  #5

Facing south it wouldn't matter if there had been aurora. The WB is just too purple. I have a pano from past week that has entire MW arch and ends with some aurora to the north, and the sky to the south has no purple at all. The only thing atmospherically that would effect the color if the sky is airglow, which is more green.


Nikon D750, Nikon 50 f1.8, Tokina 16-28 f2.8, Tamron 150-600
www.jsecordphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Micro5797
Senior Member
Avatar
488 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 160
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Montana
     
Apr 21, 2015 11:13 |  #6

jsecordphoto wrote in post #17524739 (external link)
Facing south it wouldn't matter if there had been aurora. The WB is just too purple. I have a pano from past week that has entire MW arch and ends with some aurora to the north, and the sky to the south has no purple at all. The only thing atmospherically that would effect the color if the sky is airglow, which is more green.

Thanks. I guess it didn't even occur to me that he was shooting south. I had just been out shooting the AB myself and must have been stuck in that frame of mind.
Could the red be from city lights? When i shoot toward the nearest town for me with 40k people including surrounding area, i get a lot of red in the image.


_______________
Canon 70D | 70-200mm f2.8 MK1 | 85mm f1.8 | 50mm f1.8 | Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 non vc| Nissin Di866 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
freestylee30
Senior Member
Avatar
796 posts
Gallery: 164 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 174
Joined Jun 2007
Location: 98059
     
Apr 22, 2015 14:33 |  #7

I like them, good first try - wayyyy better than my first attempt!

I don't mind the color or the foreground, honestly.

Obviously the foreground is something you will want to mind for future shoots, but I think for a first run it is perfectly acceptable.

Good job and thanks for sharing!


Brandon | zenfolio (external link)| ♥ feedback ♥
Eternal Blue Forever Green
Image Editing OK

CANON 5DIV 50 f/1.8 85 f/1.8 135 f/2L 70-200 f/2.8L IS II
ROKINON 14 f/2.8 | TAMRON 15-30 f/2.8 VC 24-70 f/2.8 VC | SIGMA 35 f/1.4 Art |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Varneeezy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
379 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2014
Location: Bakersfield Ca.
     
Apr 22, 2015 23:53 |  #8

jsecordphoto wrote in post #17524739 (external link)
Facing south it wouldn't matter if there had been aurora. The WB is just too purple. I have a pano from past week that has entire MW arch and ends with some aurora to the north, and the sky to the south has no purple at all. The only thing atmospherically that would effect the color if the sky is airglow, which is more green.

Before anybody said anything about the color of the sky I realized I added too much purple. So here is the final edit. Yes i did add a little color to the sky but in my honest opinion I think a dull grey/black sky is just boring. I think the final edit is much better and hope you guys feel the same.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/04/4/LQ_724219.jpg
Image hosted by forum (724219) © Varneeezy [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
freestylee30
Senior Member
Avatar
796 posts
Gallery: 164 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 174
Joined Jun 2007
Location: 98059
     
Apr 23, 2015 12:27 as a reply to  @ Varneeezy's post |  #9

New edit looks good, nice job!


Brandon | zenfolio (external link)| ♥ feedback ♥
Eternal Blue Forever Green
Image Editing OK

CANON 5DIV 50 f/1.8 85 f/1.8 135 f/2L 70-200 f/2.8L IS II
ROKINON 14 f/2.8 | TAMRON 15-30 f/2.8 VC 24-70 f/2.8 VC | SIGMA 35 f/1.4 Art |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Varneeezy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
379 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2014
Location: Bakersfield Ca.
     
Apr 23, 2015 20:30 |  #10

freestylee30 wrote in post #17529484 (external link)
New edit looks good, nice job!

Thank you. I'm very happy with it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,323 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Milky Way.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1306 guests, 117 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.