Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 19 Apr 2015 (Sunday) 22:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Disappearing PS edits. Driving me mad.

 
Trvlr323
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Apr 19, 2015 22:37 |  #1

Hopefully some of you PS experts out there can help me with this one. I'll explain in detail what I'm doing below but the end result is that when I merge visible layers, flatten the image or save back to Lightroom my PS edits disappear. Here is where I'm noticing this.

- I take a night shot that includes stars, import to Lightroom and do basic edits.
- Export to PS CS6 for editing (to boost the stars).
- I select the star by using select-color range and then clicking on a star with the sample tool.
- Duplicate the selection to a layer.
- Change the blending mode to Screen.
- Duplicate that layer as many times as needed to achieve the look I want.
- Group the layers, add a layer mask and brush out the effect where desired.

Up to this point everything is good but as soon as I merge, flatten or save back to Lightroom the effects of my layers immediately disappear. Can anyone clue me in as to why this is happening?

Thanks for reading!!


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Apr 19, 2015 23:03 |  #2

Let's talk about flattening first. What we need to know is, do the edits still "disappear" if you're viewing at 100% when you flatten?


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,118 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1681
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Apr 20, 2015 05:03 |  #3

Assuming that you move from the RAW file in LR to PS using the Edit in PS command, are you simply saving the PSD/TIFF file (depending on your preferences) by using the Save command (Ctrl+S) or are you doing a Save As? If you are doing a Save As the file that is created will not be auto-imported and stacked with the original RAW file in LR. You must use Save to see the resulting PSD/TIFF file in LR along with the RAW file.

Personally I do not flatten the image in PS, I know that it can make a huge difference in file size, but I treat the PSD files from PS as being a "work in progress" So I keep all my layers intact so that I can go back and make changes should they be necessary. If I get a stage in the process where it suggests flattening the layer stack for the next stage I use I think it's called Stamp Visible Layers, using the Ctrl+Shift+Alt+E command. This produces a new layer comprised of all current visible layers. You can then use this layer, for doing things like High Pass sharpening. I have seen tutorials on HP sharpening, where it is suggested to flatten, then duplicate the flattened layer to use for the HP Sharpen. Using Stamp Visible layers allows you to do the HP Sharpen on the top of the existing stack.

I suggest that you try a Stamp Visible Layers at the top of your layer stack, and see if it keeps the image looking the same. If it has worked correctly, you should see no change in the visible image just the new layer in the layers pallet. This will at least tell you that you can indeed combine all of those layers successfully. If Stamp Visible works for you I do not know why flatten would not also work correctly, but at least you would have a work around while you figure out the problem with flatten. After all Flatten just seems to do a Stamp Visible followed by deleting all the lower layers.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Apr 20, 2015 08:16 |  #4

Thanks so much for the replies so far. Please see my responses below.

Damo77 wrote in post #17524467 (external link)
Let's talk about flattening first. What we need to know is, do the edits still "disappear" if you're viewing at 100% when you flatten?

This happens regardless of viewing magnification.

BigAl007 wrote in post #17524692 (external link)
Assuming that you move from the RAW file in LR to PS using the Edit in PS command, are you simply saving the PSD/TIFF file (depending on your preferences) by using the Save command (Ctrl+S) or are you doing a Save As? If you are doing a Save As the file that is created will not be auto-imported and stacked with the original RAW file in LR. You must use Save to see the resulting PSD/TIFF file in LR along with the RAW file.

Thanks Alan. When I originally noticed this I was just closing PS and letting the default save/import back to Lightroom happen without merging/flattening first and yes, the TIFF was stacked with the original. So, just closing and accepting the save dialogue box. I started doing a keyboard shortcut save in PS to test things out and then tried exporting the image from PS to a Jpeg file outside of LR to see if it made a difference (which it didn't). That is when I noticed that merging/flattening inside PS was causing the changes to disappear. So to recap, I can make my edits then merge or flatten and the changes disappear. I hit the undo shortcut...edits reappear. I use the TIFF format when using PS as LRs external editor. I assume the image gets flattened upon save/close. I'd like to point out that this is only happening in this scenario. My external editing works as one would expect otherwise.

BigAl007 wrote in post #17524692 (external link)
Personally I do not flatten the image in PS, I know that it can make a huge difference in file size, but I treat the PSD files from PS as being a "work in progress" So I keep all my layers intact so that I can go back and make changes should they be necessary. If I get a stage in the process where it suggests flattening the layer stack for the next stage I use I think it's called Stamp Visible Layers, using the Ctrl+Shift+Alt+E command. This produces a new layer comprised of all current visible layers. You can then use this layer, for doing things like High Pass sharpening. I have seen tutorials on HP sharpening, where it is suggested to flatten, then duplicate the flattened layer to use for the HP Sharpen. Using Stamp Visible layers allows you to do the HP Sharpen on the top of the existing stack.

I suggest that you try a Stamp Visible Layers at the top of your layer stack, and see if it keeps the image looking the same. If it has worked correctly, you should see no change in the visible image just the new layer in the layers pallet. This will at least tell you that you can indeed combine all of those layers successfully. If Stamp Visible works for you I do not know why flatten would not also work correctly, but at least you would have a work around while you figure out the problem with flatten. After all Flatten just seems to do a Stamp Visible followed by deleting all the lower layers.

Alan

Just tried a stamp visible and... poof. Edits gone. Ever feel like you're going completely mad?


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,118 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1681
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Apr 20, 2015 12:58 |  #5

I've no idea about the flattening issue, or the Stamp Visible layers. Have you tried doing a Save As as a JPEG file without flattening first? PS will now automatically flatten when doing a Save As JPEG, without affecting the original image, it even does the convert from 16 bit to 8 bit if necessary too. I'm just trying to think of all the possible ways you can flatten an image.

When you do the default save in PS back to LR, PS will save all of the layers currently in the file, including those that are hidden. Personally I prefer to keep the layers in my master copies in LR, so that I can go back to them. Storage is cheap enough to do that with now. It's not like I have to send every image to PS anymore, about 98% just stay in LR as RAw files. That's also why I do all my final exports from LR, as that way I only have to finished files on my hard drive for as long as it takes me to send them to wherever they are going, and LR manages my uploads to Flickr and FB automatically anyway.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Apr 20, 2015 13:14 as a reply to  @ BigAl007's post |  #6

Tanks for chiming in again Alan. Yes, I've tried the save to JPEG without flattening. Same result.


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Apr 20, 2015 15:00 |  #7

Can you post two screenshots for us, before and after, to show us?


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Apr 20, 2015 15:27 |  #8

Sure. Here are some screenshots that I just took. Just simple snaps from the back yard for the purpose of troubleshooting this (lots of light pollution) but you'll get the picture. In the first shot you'll see the background layer with the group containing my star enhancements (visible) and the second shot shows the image after flattening and the enhancements no longer visible.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/04/3/LQ_723793.jpg
Image hosted by forum (723793) © Trvlr323 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/04/3/LQ_723794.jpg
Image hosted by forum (723794) © Trvlr323 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
6,597 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1542
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
Post edited over 8 years ago by kirkt.
     
Apr 20, 2015 16:44 |  #9

What happens if you do the following:

1) LR > PS
2) Duplicate background to a layer (CMD-J).
3) Set this new layer to screen.
4) Duplicate the new layer as needed (CMD-J) to get the star brightness you need.
5) Group all of the star boost layers together.
6) Make a layer mask for the group, but OPT-Click on the new mask button to make the new mask filled with black (hide the effect of the group).
7) Paint with white on mask to reveal boosted stars in the group.

Flatten.

Any different?

kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
phantelope
Goldmember
Avatar
1,889 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 40
Joined Sep 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Apr 20, 2015 16:57 |  #10

I had something along this line happen (quite a while ago, so might remember wrong) and found that once I closed LR and opened it again the changes where reflected on the TIFF file. This was probably in LR4 or before and might have been some other issue all together, but worth a try? Otherwise I'd check the Adobe support forums or post there. Good luck!


40D, 5D3, a bunch of lenses and other things :cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Apr 20, 2015 18:09 |  #11

Thanks! And may we have the same pair of screenshots, but at 100%?


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Apr 20, 2015 19:52 |  #12

kirkt wrote in post #17525438 (external link)
What happens if you do the following:

1) LR > PS
2) Duplicate background to a layer (CMD-J).
3) Set this new layer to screen.
4) Duplicate the new layer as needed (CMD-J) to get the star brightness you need.
5) Group all of the star boost layers together.
6) Make a layer mask for the group, but OPT-Click on the new mask button to make the new mask filled with black (hide the effect of the group).
7) Paint with white on mask to reveal boosted stars in the group.

Flatten.

Any different?

kirk

Thanks Kirk. I just gave this a try with the exact same results. As soon as I flatten or merge visible my edits disappear.


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Apr 20, 2015 19:54 |  #13

Damo77 wrote in post #17525515 (external link)
Thanks! And may we have the same pair of screenshots, but at 100%?

Sure Damien. As soon as I get a chance I'll produce another copy with the edits even more exaggerated. May I ask what it is you hope to see with a 100% crop?


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony_Stark
Shellhead
Avatar
4,287 posts
Likes: 350
Joined May 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Apr 20, 2015 20:56 |  #14

Are the edits disappearing within PS or when viewing in LR? What happens is when editing/saving, LR takes a little to load new data. Might not be your case. Certainly sounds strange.


Nikon D810 | 24-70/2.8G | 58/1.4G
EOS M | 22 f/2 STM

Website (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Apr 20, 2015 21:00 |  #15

Tony_Stark wrote in post #17525707 (external link)
Are the edits disappearing within PS or when viewing in LR? What happens is when editing/saving, LR takes a little to load new data. Might not be your case. Certainly sounds strange.

This is happening in PS as soon as I flatten or merge. It also happens when I save to LR with or without merging/flattening prior to the save. It can take a bit for the edits to propagate to LR but unfortunately that isn't the case. They just aren't there.


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,383 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Disappearing PS edits. Driving me mad.
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
852 guests, 142 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.