Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 22 Apr 2015 (Wednesday) 15:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Flowers CC

 
hiketheplanet
Senior Member
Avatar
666 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 14
Joined May 2013
     
Apr 22, 2015 15:06 |  #1

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/04/4/LQ_724174.jpg
Image hosted by forum (724174) © hiketheplanet [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mamaof2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,361 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 95
Joined May 2014
     
Apr 22, 2015 17:43 |  #2

Pretty flowers. I think the flowers get lost with that background. I would try to lighten the flowers up some to see if that would help.


Jessi
T4i/Nifty fifty/ 18-55/ DCR 250 macro attachment/ 55-250 stm/ Few old film lenses
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Post edited over 8 years ago by Alveric.
     
Apr 22, 2015 17:53 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

mamaof2 wrote in post #17528477 (external link)
Pretty flowers. I think the flowers get lost with that background. I would try to lighten the flowers up some to see if that would help.

+1

Also, the heart-shaped and the bean-shaped blown-to-white patches pretty much ruin the whole frame.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
patrick ­ j
Goldmember
2,461 posts
Gallery: 77 photos
Likes: 8695
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Denver
     
Apr 23, 2015 10:19 |  #4

I like the bright out of focus background, but it overwhelms the darker foreground. It's not bad, but probably needed a brighter foreground to really work well.


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hiketheplanet
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
666 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 14
Joined May 2013
     
Apr 23, 2015 10:42 |  #5

Thanks for the feedback!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronin1
Member
157 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Dec 2008
     
Apr 23, 2015 19:17 |  #6

I would have to agree with all the others. The background to me is too distracting and the flowers get lost in the background as well. I think this shot has potential though if you can go back with different light and try a few different angles.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
idkdc
Goldmember
Avatar
3,230 posts
Likes: 409
Joined Oct 2014
     
Apr 23, 2015 19:23 |  #7

Perhaps playing with the white balance might help things?


I like big cinema cameras and I can not lie
You other brothers can't deny

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,190 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Flowers CC
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1099 guests, 169 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.