Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 30 Apr 2015 (Thursday) 09:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How Long Should You Keep a Computer?

 
Dave ­ R.
Senior Member
275 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
Apr 30, 2015 09:47 |  #1

Not grinding on PC users here so please don't take it that way. To each their own. I have a Mac Pro that was built 8 or 9 years ago that has been trouble free since I purchased it used 7 years ago with the only exception being a graphics card went bad. Now the second issue pops up and that is I cannot load LR5 because the operating system is not upgradable and will not accept LR5.
The machine works great in everything else. I do have a MacBookPro that I was able to get LR5 loaded too so the software can be used. Just wondering for you out there that use Macs when do you call it quits and upgrade? Not a grind on PC but when I used them I was lucky to get 3 to 4 years out of them and upgrades where more common so I never ran into this before.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bk2life
Senior Member
587 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Likes: 40
Joined Nov 2010
Location: az/ca/hi/afg
     
Apr 30, 2015 10:09 |  #2

usually 3-4 years for me.

there are too many upcoming changes in the computer world to keep one any longer.

similar to your cell phone, every year a new one comes out that kicks last years butt.


-james
5Diii|7D|Nifty 50|Canon 17-55mm-2.8|Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS ii|2x 600EX-RT|ST-E3-RT|CS6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,724 posts
Likes: 4054
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Apr 30, 2015 10:22 |  #3

PC user here but upgrades were more for performance reasons and less for technical/mechanical reasons. I still have several PCs that are over 10 years old and still function just fine. They are slower than molasses and I have donated many to older family members who still use them for web surfing and email so they do not stress them much from a performance standpoint.

My upgrades tend to be incremental though. Every few years upgrade the OS, upgrade the graphic card, more disk drive, update a CDROM or DVD and such. about every 5 years or so I will start a new build and salvage the newer parts and upgrade the motherboard, processor and memory. I like to keep up with improvement and do so on an as needed basis. My current build has some parts that are quite old and still functioning just fine. My case is probably 15 years old by now and the power supply not much newer. Everything else has been upgraded and the parts put into other machines. My 87 year old aunt has the oldest stuff I think. It still is running and old Athlon XP (t-bred core I think) and that one has to be over 12 years old. So slow but she is happy with it.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EnglishBob
Senior Member
Avatar
555 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 119
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Clovis, California.
     
Apr 30, 2015 10:32 |  #4

My current processing machines are 3 years and 2 years old. I tend to upgrade / replace every 5-6 years.


Gallery (external link) MyGear (external link) About Me (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Apr 30, 2015 10:45 |  #5

My oldest Apple machine is a 2009 not completely maxed out iMac that still does very well for photo editing and runs Yosemite smoothly (never did a clean install. Only upgrades). When I was using PC/Windows my replacement window was about 3 years on average.


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
someone0
Senior Member
436 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jul 2014
     
Apr 30, 2015 10:46 |  #6

I'm the same w/ gjl711 here. Mainly upgrade for performance or specific thing I want. EG, 4k/retina. I have both rMBP and PC notebook/desktop running Mac, Windows and even Linux. I build a few PC myself as well, either for specific reason like low power usage server. If you need performance because you shoot RAW or edit video, then I would say 2-3 years. But otherwise every 5-6 years is normal also. Yes there are people who use computer that are older than that, but generally that's not for people who demand computer performance. But if you use your computer online, then I think you want the computer to at least be able to use up-to-date OS and software at the minimum for security reason.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bluetreefrog
Member
Avatar
79 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 24
Joined Feb 2015
Location: Canada
     
Apr 30, 2015 10:50 |  #7

Like nqjudo I have a 2009 IMac and it is completely fine when editing pictures. my only problem is that video editing can be a bit slow, but it's still good enough for me.


Aspiring young amateur hobbyist photographer. Wow, that's a lot of descriptors!
flickr (external link)Gear
RedBubble (external link)
Constructive criticism, helpful tips and feedback always welcome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Apr 30, 2015 11:02 |  #8

I don't trust hard drives older than 3-5 years. Other than that I put as many years on them as possible. Last year I put a new SSD HD, fan, and inverter cable in my 2009 macbook. It is not the speediest thing on the planet but it gets the job done.

Your issue with not being able to upgrade the OS is a common one with recent (last 8 years or so) Macs. Apple clearly saw that the resources needed to keep up 7ish year old Macs, plus the missed revenue from not getting new sales was "hurting" the bottom line. All us with 2009 macs are next up for being cut loose on OS upgrades. Better start planning for your next computer.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Apr 30, 2015 11:14 |  #9

Left Handed Brisket wrote in post #17538450 (external link)
I don't trust hard drives older than 3-5 years. Other than that I put as many years on them as possible. Last year I put a new SSD HD, fan, and inverter cable in my 2009 macbook. It is not the speediest thing on the planet but it gets the job done.

Your issue with not being able to upgrade the OS is a common one with recent (last 8 years or so) Macs. Apple clearly saw that the resources needed to keep up 7ish year old Macs, plus the missed revenue from not getting new sales was "hurting" the bottom line. All us with 2009 macs are next up for being cut loose on OS upgrades. Better start planning for your next computer.

True enough LHB. Keep in mind that the mid-2009 model is target-mode capable. It can work as an external monitor for just a about anything including a Thunderbolt1/2 capable machine via a mini DisplayPort cable. It makes for interesting possibilities to use the iMac as a monitor for a Mac Mini or notebook and still function as storage, etc. on your network. I use this configuration for editing from my MBP quite often.


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Myboostedgst
Goldmember
Avatar
1,911 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Likes: 666
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Milwaukee, WI
     
Apr 30, 2015 11:16 |  #10

My $400 emachines from Walmart was purchased 2009. Never replaced any hardware, finally reloaded OS 6 months ago. I still use it today to edit my D600 RAW files.

I am looking to replace it though as I just want a faster machine to make editing more efficient.


Andrew | Midwest Automotive (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
njstacker22
Senior Member
Avatar
703 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 93
Joined Mar 2014
Location: Hamilton, NJ
     
Apr 30, 2015 11:17 |  #11

Until it stops running or until it begins to interfere with the ability to upgrade. Sounds to me like you should start planning for another computer.


Sony A7ii [Sony FE 16-35mm f/4] [Sony FE 28-70mm] [Rokinon 135mm F2] [Sony 50mm 1.8]
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/djbigley/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HoosierJoe
Goldmember
Avatar
2,579 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Central Indiana
     
Apr 30, 2015 12:11 |  #12

I keep them until they are no longer usable or practical to use. My Toshiba laptop was 6 yrs old until screen started getting dim. Turned off screen, put it on a cooling pad, and hooked it to my tv with hdmi; VIOLA a smart TV!



Ain't nothin but a thing.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
110yd
Senior Member
790 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Jan 2005
     
Apr 30, 2015 12:13 |  #13

I used to build a new machine every 18 months or so. (Employed in the Semiconductor world). I build a 1st gen I7-930, with an Intel DX58SO motherboard in 2009. I have upgraded the hard drive multiple times, added a SSD, and maxed out the RAM. The machine is 6 years old and still runs strong. I don't have trouble with RAW files from any of the Canon gear, and it handles what little video I edit. This machine has been problem free from day one. I built a few for some photo buddies and have had zero complaints. This machine rocks...

Regards,

110yd




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Apr 30, 2015 14:33 |  #14

My i7 2600K machine was built in 2011, so 4 years, and it's still going strong. When I check out cpu benchmarks the performance of new CPUs is around 30-40% better, though I'm not sure about real world performance. I figure in a few years I might upgrade.

2600K CPU score (external link). 4790K CPU score (external link).


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark0159
I say stupid things all the time
Avatar
12,935 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 286
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Hamilton, New Zealand
     
Apr 30, 2015 16:13 |  #15

Dave R. wrote in post #17538387 (external link)
Not grinding on PC users here so please don't take it that way. To each their own. I have a Mac Pro that was built 8 or 9 years ago that has been trouble free since I purchased it used 7 years ago with the only exception being a graphics card went bad. Now the second issue pops up and that is I cannot load LR5 because the operating system is not upgradable and will not accept LR5.
The machine works great in everything else. I do have a MacBookPro that I was able to get LR5 loaded too so the software can be used. Just wondering for you out there that use Macs when do you call it quits and upgrade? Not a grind on PC but when I used them I was lucky to get 3 to 4 years out of them and upgrades where more common so I never ran into this before.

You upgrade when you start having this problem. You come across a new app that you can run because you your OS needs an upgrade and there is no upgrade for it.

the time to upgrade is when the computer is too slow and you can't get parts for it. If it's got a fault and the cost of the repair would be the cost of a new computer.

but like anything it up to you. You may find that a new computer could last you another 7 years.

As for myself I build my own so replacing parts is what I do. It gives me the flexibility to upgrade bits as I need to.


Mark
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/52782633@N04 (external link)
Canon EOS 6D | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM | Tamron SP 35mm F1.8 Di VC USD | Canon Speedlite 550EX -|- Film | Canon EOS 3 | Olympus OM2 | Zuiko 35mm f2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,785 views & 1 like for this thread, 28 members have posted to it and it is followed by 14 members.
How Long Should You Keep a Computer?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1400 guests, 113 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.