Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 30 Apr 2015 (Thursday) 15:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Baffling focus issue with Canon EF-S 17-55mm/2.8

 
Archibald
THREAD ­ STARTER
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 50999
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
May 02, 2015 18:44 |  #31

Gymbow wrote in post #17540950 (external link)
Images as well as the scene are in focus when looking at Live View. The OOF issues only occur when taking images though the view finder under the conditions I described earlier in this thread when I was responding to the OP.

Indeed.

This thread is not about live view focusing, it is not about shooting walls or hyperfocal distance, it is about a specific AF malfunction with this lens. The malfunction is easy to demonstrate and is reproducible for the lenses that exhibit the problem.

I would dearly like to hear from any owner of this lens whether they have noticed the same problem, or alternatively whether they have verified that their copy focuses accurately most of the time when shooting distant subjects with a wide aperture.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
h14nha
Goldmember
Avatar
2,095 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 179
Joined Nov 2008
Location: South Wales, UK
     
May 02, 2015 18:59 |  #32

Well I've never shot at a distant subject with the lens wide open, but I will in the morning if you would like me to. I have a 7D/XSi so I can try both if you wish..........


Ian
There's no fool like an old skool fool :D
myflickr (external link)
My Gear - 7d, / 16-35mm F4 / 70-200 2.8 II / 100-400 / 300mm 2.8 / 500/4 :D XT-1 Graphite 18/35/56

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
THREAD ­ STARTER
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 50999
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
May 02, 2015 19:27 |  #33

h14nha wrote in post #17540980 (external link)
Well I've never shot at a distant subject with the lens wide open, but I will in the morning if you would like me to. I have a 7D/XSi so I can try both if you wish..........

It would be appreciated!

The AF error (if it is present) varies randomly. About 1/3 are badly OOF, a glance at the pic on the computer and you know it.

I hope yours is good.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
THREAD ­ STARTER
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 50999
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
May 02, 2015 21:10 |  #34

Left Handed Brisket wrote in post #17540628 (external link)
shooting a wall tests for various lens problems that are related to the optics. Bad glass, misaligned elements, or just poor sharpness in all corners.

IMO it won't do anything to help explain or provide a workaround for your focus problem.

edit: the other issue when shooting a big wall is that you would have to have the camera sensor exactly parallel to the wall, both up and down and left to right. It's much harder than you might expect, i know from experience doing copy shots.

This is all correct. There is opportunity for many red herrings when chasing faults with lenses.

Nevertheless, I have done the wall test as best I could, with the lens wide open. I noticed nothing out of the ordinary. The optics of this lens are fine.

However, it has randomly bad AF when shooting distant objects.

I won't post the wall picture since that might distract from the subject of the thread.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
THREAD ­ STARTER
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 50999
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
May 02, 2015 21:13 |  #35

gjl711 wrote in post #17540623 (external link)
You misunderstand. I focused using the phase detect focus through the viewfinder just like normal. Then switch to live view to check the focus and see what it focused on. Each time there was no need to re-focus as it hit the target each time very consistently, it did not miss once. This was true whether focusing close or far at a larg aperture or small.

Well, this is a different angle on the subject. It is interesting, and I might give it a try myself. However, while it is related to the issue some of us are having with this lens, it does not actually address it. Will your lens give consistent sharp results when focusing on distant objects using normal thru-the-lens AF?


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bumpintheroad
Self-inflicted bait
Avatar
1,692 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 352
Joined Oct 2013
Location: NJ, USA
     
May 02, 2015 21:36 |  #36

Archibald wrote in post #17540960 (external link)
Indeed.

This thread is not about live view focusing, it is not about shooting walls or hyperfocal distance, it is about a specific AF malfunction with this lens. The malfunction is easy to demonstrate and is reproducible for the lenses that exhibit the problem.

I would dearly like to hear from any owner of this lens whether they have noticed the same problem, or alternatively whether they have verified that their copy focuses accurately most of the time when shooting distant subjects with a wide aperture.

I haven't noticed the problem with my 17-55 so far. But I did have general focus issues not limited to any one lens or distance that turned out to be the body, and these have now been repaired (according to Canon).

I will try to go out tomorrow and test for you.


-- Mark | Gear | Flickr (external link) | Picasa (external link) | Youtube (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Image editing is okay

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,730 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
May 02, 2015 23:34 |  #37

Archibald wrote in post #17541130 (external link)
Well, this is a different angle on the subject. It is interesting, and I might give it a try myself. However, while it is related to the issue some of us are having with this lens, it does not actually address it. Will your lens give consistent sharp results when focusing on distant objects using normal thru-the-lens AF?

You still don't understand. I am focusing as normal. not focusing using live view. Once focused I check the focus using live view zooming in 10x to see if the target I choose is in focus. Without fail it is. My copy of the lens is not missing focus.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
THREAD ­ STARTER
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 50999
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
May 02, 2015 23:56 |  #38

gjl711 wrote in post #17541237 (external link)
You still don't understand. I am focusing as normal. not focusing using live view. Once focused I check the focus using live view zooming in 10x to see if the target I choose is in focus. Without fail it is. My copy of the lens is not missing focus.

Do you take the picture and examine it on the computer? That's what matters, not whether live view agrees.

When I shoot with the lens, I get apparent quick focusing, confirmation beep, green dot, the target in the viewfinder appears sharp - everything appears normal until I take the picture and examine it on the computer. Then and only then do I notice that there are a significant number of shots out of focus (severely front-focused).

So maybe I don't understand, but please tell me if you actually take the picture and examine it on the computer.

I believe something happens to the focus (in a significant number of instances) in the moment between focus acquisition and pressing the shutter button all the way.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,730 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
May 03, 2015 08:44 |  #39

Archibald wrote in post #17541244 (external link)
Do you take the picture and examine it on the computer? That's what matters, not whether live view agrees.

When I shoot with the lens, I get apparent quick focusing, confirmation beep, green dot, the target in the viewfinder appears sharp - everything appears normal until I take the picture and examine it on the computer. Then and only then do I notice that there are a significant number of shots out of focus (severely front-focused).

So maybe I don't understand, but please tell me if you actually take the picture and examine it on the computer.

I believe something happens to the focus (in a significant number of instances) in the moment between focus acquisition and pressing the shutter button all the way.

I have taken pictures and looked at them as well but not every time. Checking with live view confirms that the lens has focused. I do not show this behavior. It focuses accurately every time.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
May 03, 2015 09:08 |  #40

Archibald - this must be very frustrating for you. I just noticed this thread and haven't read it thoroughly so my apologies if I'm repeating previous comments. I had a 17-55 years ago with the exact same problem. It was a mystery that went on for some time and occurred with the IS in the on or off position. Eventually the IS failed and I sent the unit in for service. The only reference on the manifest was regarding replacement of IS components so I can't say if something else was done but the problem never reoccurred after that service. The only specific detail I recall from the manifest was a reference to the 3rd group assembly. Hope that provides some help to you.


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
THREAD ­ STARTER
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 50999
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
May 03, 2015 14:00 |  #41

gjl711 wrote in post #17541496 (external link)
I have taken pictures and looked at them as well but not every time. Checking with live view confirms that the lens has focused. I do not show this behavior. It focuses accurately every time.

Thanks, JJ, it is very useful to know that you have a copy of the lens that focuses accurately and without issues at long distances.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
h14nha
Goldmember
Avatar
2,095 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 179
Joined Nov 2008
Location: South Wales, UK
     
May 03, 2015 17:28 |  #42

Ok, I did a quick and dirty test earlier, F8 on the left and F2.8 on the right. It was a quick, hand held shot to test your theory, shots taken seconds apart. I've zoomed in and taken a screenshot so it's not the best of example, but the F2.8 is definitely blurry..........

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/05/1/LQ_725899.jpg
Image hosted by forum (725899) © h14nha [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Ian
There's no fool like an old skool fool :D
myflickr (external link)
My Gear - 7d, / 16-35mm F4 / 70-200 2.8 II / 100-400 / 300mm 2.8 / 500/4 :D XT-1 Graphite 18/35/56

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,119 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
May 03, 2015 17:39 |  #43

Just one quick question, if this front focus is as severe as it seems from the posted images, surely you are seeing it in the viewfinder? I'm sure I would notice if the image was that out of focus when I was viewing the image in the VF. Not that that helps with the issue of the lens randomly missing focus on subjects at longer distances.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
THREAD ­ STARTER
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 50999
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
May 03, 2015 17:41 |  #44

I ran some more tests today on the loaner 17-55mm lens that Canon Service provided. I used a tripod, AF center point, IS off, OneShot, ISO 100, and shot at focal lengths of 35mm or 55mm. Here's what I found.

On my 7D2, 15 blurry shots, 4 slightly blurry, 7 sharp. That's 73% failures.
In Live View, I obtained 4 out of 4 sharp results.

I also shot some tests on my SL1 body, same conditions as above. Results were
No blurry shots, 1 slightly blurry, 13 sharp. Only 7% failures.
Also 2 sharp shots in Live View.

All the blurry shots were severely front-focused.

When shooting, I get quick apparent focus lock, a confirming beep, and green AF dot in the viewfinder. The subject looks sharp. The distance scale of the lens does not move when the shutter is released. Everything seems fine while shooting. There is no indication at all of a problem. However, the problem is obvious when chimping and when viewing the results on the computer.

At a zoom of 55mm, most of the results were sharp. At 35mm, most were bad.

When comparing AF and Live View, I noticed that the focus usually shifts slightly and sometimes significantly when going from Live View to AF. I don't know if this means anything.

Like I said, I'm baffled.

Here is an example from today, comparing at 100%. I guess it should be obvious, but AF is on the left and LV manual focus on the right. Straight out of the camera.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/05/1/LQ_725906.jpg
Image hosted by forum (725906) © Archibald [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
THREAD ­ STARTER
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 50999
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
Post edited over 8 years ago by Archibald.
     
May 03, 2015 17:48 |  #45

h14nha wrote in post #17542031 (external link)
Ok, I did a quick and dirty test earlier, F8 on the left and F2.8 on the right. It was a quick, hand held shot to test your theory, shots taken seconds apart. I've zoomed in and taken a screenshot so it's not the best of example, but the F2.8 is definitely blurry..........

Interesting.

I don't recall if I mentioned it in this thread, but Canon Service recommended that I shoot at f/22 with this lens ... he said he found that a "greater percentage of shots were sharp" at f/22 when he tested the 17-55mm.

A $1000 lens and he tells me to use it at f/22. :-x

There's actually a veiled admission of fault in his advice.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

38,463 views & 6 likes for this thread, 28 members have posted to it and it is followed by 15 members.
Baffling focus issue with Canon EF-S 17-55mm/2.8
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is SteveeY
1270 guests, 169 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.