Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 08 May 2015 (Friday) 05:04
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Processing in Camera Special Processing

 
CameraMan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,368 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 813
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
     
May 08, 2015 05:04 |  #1

OK, I've posted this in another thread but no one seems to be looking at that thread so I'll post it here since I've had Canon cameras that did the same thing.

So I hardly ever use the artistic dial settings until now. I just got a Lumix FZ1000 and was playing around with the Art setting the other day. I got some really cool shots according to the review screen. Problem is, when I bring the photos into Photoshop I see my settings have not been applied to the photos. They just look like regular photos. But I used the SILKYPIX Developer Studio 4.1 SE that came with the camera and saw a preview of the photo I took with the camera settings but again, it just looks like a regular photo in the actual editor. Do I need to apply the settings manually in my photo editor to get these to come up the way they looked in the camera?


Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
May 08, 2015 14:41 |  #2

I know nothing about that camera, but it sound like behavior you would get if shooting Raw: your in-camera preview shows an embedded jpeg with your in-camera settings but if you open it in a Raw processor (such as Adobe Camera Raw) all those custom settings are ignored.

If the camera came with software you might give it a try. Canon cameras come with the Canon Raw processing software Digital Photo Professional (DPP) and when you open a Canon Raw file the viewer shows all your custom in-camera settings.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Marchant
Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy?
Avatar
5,635 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2058
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
     
May 08, 2015 21:48 |  #3

+1 to the above. In-camera processing only applies when you shoot JPEG. The camera will process the image and spit it out with the creative edits applied. If you shoot RAW, you get RAW data (which may include some details of what in-camera processing was selected) but most RAW editors can't emulate the in-camera processing so they ignore it.

The camera makers own post processing software will usually be able to recreate the in-camera effects but third party programs like Lightroom, Capture One, Photoshop etc wont.


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: danmarchant.com (external link)
Instagram: @dan_marchant (external link)
Gear Canon 5DIII + Fuji X-T2 + lenses + a plastic widget I found in the camera box.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,368 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 813
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
     
May 09, 2015 17:26 |  #4

I'll have to bite the bullet and shoot in jpg the next time I want to try out those settings.


Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

826 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Processing in Camera Special Processing
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1669 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.