Can I set my camera to retract it on shutoff? I have a 70D and SL1.
No, both of those cameras don't have the lens retract option.
The M3, T6i, T6s, and 5Ds are the only ones I know of that have it.
msowsun "approx 8mm" More info Post edited over 8 years ago by msowsun. (2 edits in all) | May 28, 2015 07:40 | #466 BlakeC wrote in post #17574419 Can I set my camera to retract it on shutoff? I have a 70D and SL1. No, both of those cameras don't have the lens retract option. Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
05Xrunner Goldmember, Flipflopper. More info | May 29, 2015 10:36 | #467 I am going to return mine. The more I use it 50mm just seems to short for me. I am going to replace it with the 85mm 1.8 My gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 29, 2015 12:01 | #468 05Xrunner wrote in post #17575901 I am going to return mine. The more I use it 50mm just seems to short for me. I am going to replace it with the 85mm 1.8 The 85 is beautiful if you can handle the acute CA. I sold mine becase the MFD was too far.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
05Xrunner Goldmember, Flipflopper. More info | May 29, 2015 12:02 | #469 i have owned the 85mm twice already and liked it. the CA isnt awful if you pay attention and can remove most in LR My gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 29, 2015 12:32 | #470 Mine arrived yesterday. Definitely a huge upgrade from the nifty fifty. I've tried it on my 6D and 40D, AF is dead-on on both cameras no MA is needed. Love this lens! and I even find that petite 49mm lens cap very cute! Canon 6D, 16-35 f/4L, 24-105L, Tamron 100-400, Zeiss 25/2 ZE, Tamron 35/1.8, Canon 85/1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KDED Mostly Lurking More info Post edited over 8 years ago by KDED. | I sold my nifty-fifty to get an 85/1.8 a few years ago. As others have mentioned, 85/1.8 is a fine lens, and CA has not been a huge issue to me, but since then I somehow missed the 50mm focal length. Now I finally have it back. I think I'll keep both, considering how affordable this lens is. Canon 6D, 16-35 f/4L, 24-105L, Tamron 100-400, Zeiss 25/2 ZE, Tamron 35/1.8, Canon 85/1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
05Xrunner Goldmember, Flipflopper. More info | May 29, 2015 12:55 | #472 maybe I will keep both just cause how cheap the 50 was My gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chris001 Senior Member More info | May 29, 2015 14:49 | #473 two samples for my copy. I like it a couple of vintage cameras - natural light. IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/svtDkt Thanks!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 29, 2015 19:12 | #474 First real world shot, snapped at 1.8 on my way to test AF. IQ at least as good as my 1.8II and much nicer to use. It will allay my desire for the 1.2 for a while. Image hosted by forum (730145) © Patrick H [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (730146) © Patrick H [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. 5D mkIV | 35Lii | 135L | + some zooms.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PatrickH Member More info Post edited over 8 years ago by Patrick H. | May 29, 2015 19:22 | #475 This is the original. I apolagise for my newbie PP. Image hosted by forum (730147) © Patrick H [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (730149) © Patrick H [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. 5D mkIV | 35Lii | 135L | + some zooms.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Immaculens THREAD STARTER creeped by the TF.... More info Post edited over 8 years ago by Immaculens. (2 edits in all) | May 29, 2015 19:24 | #476 I still need to do front-back focus testing on mine, been lazy ~ Image hosted by forum (730148) © Immaculens [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
05Xrunner Goldmember, Flipflopper. More info | May 29, 2015 21:30 | #477 I am keeping both. Picked up my 85 tonight but playing with the 50 earlier and it is just really good lens for the price. Stupid to get rid of it for how cheap it is My gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BlakeC "Dad was a meat cutter" More info | May 29, 2015 21:48 | #478 05Xrunner wrote in post #17576543 Stupid to get rid of it for how cheap it is I think that is what Canon is going for...So cheap why NOT buy it?! Blake C
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vorlon1 Goldmember More info Post edited over 8 years ago by vorlon1. | May 29, 2015 22:14 | #479 You guys wanting a lens hood without paying a lot of money, I have a 49mm screw on metal hood on mine that I had on another lens. You can get them for between 5 and 10 dollars on amazon. You can just do a search for "49mm metal lens hood," and see other styles. "We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are." -- Anais Nin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
05Xrunner Goldmember, Flipflopper. More info | May 29, 2015 22:38 | #480 but the screw in doesnt protect anything. its screwed into the part that extends. the canon hood is a bayonet that connects to teh body and hides the extending barrel and can offer some protection. The screw in one just makes it easier to smack it off something and maybe damage something by forcing it in My gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is EBiffany 611 guests, 106 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||