Ok, guess it's not the one for you, then, I'm using it for the ability to block reflected light, mostly, not the other points you mentioned.
vorlon1 Goldmember More info Post edited over 8 years ago by vorlon1. | May 29, 2015 23:14 | #481 Ok, guess it's not the one for you, then, I'm using it for the ability to block reflected light, mostly, not the other points you mentioned. "We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are." -- Anais Nin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Furlan Senior Member 868 posts Likes: 214 Joined Nov 2012 More info | May 30, 2015 06:57 | #482 05Xrunner wrote in post #17576609 but the screw in doesnt protect anything. its screwed into the part that extends. the canon hood is a bayonet that connects to teh body and hides the extending barrel and can offer some protection. The screw in one just makes it easier to smack it off something and maybe damage something by forcing it in So buy one of the old fashioned collapsible rubber lens shades they give. I never viewed a lens
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CanonCameraFan Goldmember 1,694 posts Likes: 142 Joined Sep 2011 Location: Annapolis Maryland More info | May 30, 2015 07:54 | #483 Somebody call for a Klutz? Here I am! EOS 7D w/BG-E7 (3), 550EX (3), 430EX II, Vivitar 285HV, Opteka 6.5mm/3.5, Canon EF-S 10-18/4.5-5.6 IS STM, Canon EF-S 24/2.8 STM, Canon EF 40/2.8 STM, Canon EF 100mm/2.0 USM, Canon EF 70-300mm/4-5.6 L IS USM, Canon 77mm 500D Macro, Tamrac 614 Bag & 787 Backpack, Crumpler 8 MDH, 7 MDH, 6 MDH
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 30, 2015 07:59 | #484 Furlan wrote in post #17576818 So buy one of the old fashioned collapsible rubber lens shades they give. I never viewed a lens shade as a lens protector and anyone whose going to smack a lens into something has to be a clutz. Some of us are klutzes, sadly. https://www.flickr.com/photos/127590681@N03/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CameraMan Cream of the Crop More info | May 30, 2015 08:02 | #485 I'm tempted to get one of these. I love the 1.8 II I have. And luckily, I'm not a klutz so I could probably do without the lens hood. Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CanonCameraFan Goldmember 1,694 posts Likes: 142 Joined Sep 2011 Location: Annapolis Maryland More info | May 30, 2015 08:09 | #486 Still waiting for my ES-68... EOS 7D w/BG-E7 (3), 550EX (3), 430EX II, Vivitar 285HV, Opteka 6.5mm/3.5, Canon EF-S 10-18/4.5-5.6 IS STM, Canon EF-S 24/2.8 STM, Canon EF 40/2.8 STM, Canon EF 100mm/2.0 USM, Canon EF 70-300mm/4-5.6 L IS USM, Canon 77mm 500D Macro, Tamrac 614 Bag & 787 Backpack, Crumpler 8 MDH, 7 MDH, 6 MDH
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vorlon1 Goldmember More info Post edited over 8 years ago by vorlon1. | May 30, 2015 12:37 | #487 Here are a couple of sample shots taken several minutes ago with a 6D at 1.8, no editing of the jpeg, except for cropping. IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/tQow7N This one is at f/4. IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/sTUSzH "We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are." -- Anais Nin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 30, 2015 13:42 | #488 Vorlon, thank you for the samples. Could you take a shot to look into CA? Say a dark building edge against a bright sky? At f1.8... Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | its weird to me that you notice such details http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | no. canon probably doesn't even know that company exists http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | or they do real photography instead of pose with their gear http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
05Xrunner Goldmember, Flipflopper. More info | May 30, 2015 16:34 | #492 WTF are you talking about My gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 30, 2015 18:51 | #493 MakisM1 wrote in post #17577126 Vorlon, thank you for the samples. Could you take a shot to look into CA? Say a dark building edge against a bright sky? At f1.8... Everything points towards replacing a perfectly good EF 50 f1.8 MkII with the STM! ![]()
"We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are." -- Anais Nin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xmark402 Member 31 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2015 More info | May 31, 2015 10:19 | #494 Regarding CA. JPEGs no edit. From tripod in aperture priority mode. #1 wanted more than 8000 shutter and is slightly over exposed. Looks like CA is present until f2.8 Image hosted by forum (730410) © xmark402 [SHARE LINK] F2.0THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (730411) © xmark402 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xmark402 Member 31 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2015 More info | May 31, 2015 10:21 | #495 F2.2 Image hosted by forum (730412) © xmark402 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. F2.5 Image hosted by forum (730413) © xmark402 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is EBiffany 611 guests, 106 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||