two more experiments.
HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
chell Senior Member 325 posts Joined Jun 2005 Location: wrexham, north wales More info | Feb 28, 2006 14:20 | #1 two more experiments. HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. 2x 20D's
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Robert_Lay Cream of the Crop  7,546 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA More info | Feb 28, 2006 16:59 | #2 #1 is getting a lot more interesting. This one works for several reasons. First the composition is quite good. Second, the tonalities are in concert with the elements that are in focus. That is, the portions that are of interest are also the brightest. Good background in that it does not distract. And lastly, there is enough of the plant in view that you can get the overall concept of its structure. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
staciecd Goldmember  1,383 posts Joined Feb 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD More info | Feb 28, 2006 17:06 | #3 I really like the first one and agree with Robert - the blooms are crisp and sharp. I also like the layout of the picture. ---------------
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Robert_Lay wrote: #1 is getting a lot more interesting. This one works for several reasons. First the composition is quite good. Second, the tonalities are in concert with the elements that are in focus. That is, the portions that are of interest are also the brightest. Good background in that it does not distract. And lastly, there is enough of the plant in view that you can get the overall concept of its structure. #2 just doesn't make it for me. There is too little that is in focus - only the nearest extremities of the blossom are in focus. Everything deeper into it is very fuzzy. Thank you for your feedback Robert. I really loved the shapes and colours of the first plant and was quite pleased with the result. On number two, I thought I would use a shallow depth of field to emphasis what I felt was the most interesting bit of the flower, which for me was the outside shape of the petals. I think you're correct though, it could be much stronger. Well, this weekend once I finish work, I have the house to myself and my sweetheart has just bought me some tulips so I'll have another go and see what I can come up with. Thanks again! 2x 20D's
LOG IN TO REPLY |
staciecd wrote: I really like the first one and agree with Robert - the blooms are crisp and sharp. I also like the layout of the picture. Stacie Thanks Stacie! 2x 20D's
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2267 guests, 128 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
, 