Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 16 May 2015 (Saturday) 15:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Two 6Ds vs One 6D and One 7D MKII ?

 
notimetochill
Senior Member
Avatar
521 posts
Likes: 273
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Sweden
     
May 16, 2015 15:53 |  #1

I have problems to decide on a future purchase. In the almost two years I have been using a 6D and are more than satisfied over image quality. now I want to have a second camera. I have previously used the crop camera and do not think I will be able to return to such a sensor after using ff. Now is the time to find the right camera.

I have long thought about a 6D then I only have EF lenses, but the idea of ​​a 7D mkII's still there but something tells me that I will not be pleased with the image quality. at the same time I feel that the development as a photographer is greater in 7D mkII as it is a professional camera and contains very fine properties and especially a feature I miss from the 70D and it is auto focus in video. of course it is nicer with a fast camera, but I will only be able to be out during good weather and maybe it makes me limited or perhaps the camera opens up possibilities to photographers flying birds again when it has cooled down after I got myself 6D earlier. it is difficult to know in advance but previously good ISO performance has been very important to me.

how would you do? get a crop camera along with my current 6D or run on dual 6D where I know what I get for camera and satisfied but perhaps a little limited in some areas that I might like to start with in the future.


SRFOTO (Homepage) (external link) - MY INSTAGRAM (external link) MY FACEBOOK (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott ­ M
Goldmember
3,399 posts
Gallery: 111 photos
Likes: 517
Joined May 2008
Location: Michigan / South Carolina
     
May 16, 2015 16:52 |  #2

You do not say why you want a second camera. Is it just to have a backup, to allow you to carry two bodies with different lenses mounted to save on lens swapping, or to use for different types of shooting? Your answer will help lead you to the right 2nd body.

I have two bodies -- a 5D3 and 7D2 (just acquired as an upgrade to my old 7D). In my case, the 7D2 is a dedicated wildlife and sports body, while the 5D3 is used for everything else. I also will sometimes carry both bodies when focusing on both landscapes and wildlife in order to greatly reduce lens changes.


Photo Gallery (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FarmerTed1971
fondling the 5D4
Avatar
7,352 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 5909
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Portland, OR
     
May 16, 2015 17:08 |  #3

I have a 6D and my next body purchase will be a 7D2 or 1D4. I want a sports and wildlife camera. With these two bodies I'll be able to do just about anything I wish. I think you can guess my answer to your question.


Getting better at this - Fuji X-t5 & X-t3 - 16 1.4 - 35/50/90 f2 - 50-140 - flickr (external link) - www.scottaticephoto.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
May 16, 2015 17:09 |  #4

Scott M wrote in post #17559031 (external link)
You do not say why you want a second camera. Is it just to have a backup, to allow you to carry two bodies with different lenses mounted to save on lens swapping, or to use for different types of shooting? Your answer will help lead you to the right 2nd body.

I have two bodies -- a 5D3 and 7D2 (just acquired as an upgrade to my old 7D). In my case, the 7D2 is a dedicated wildlife and sports body, while the 5D3 is used for everything else. I also will sometimes carry both bodies when focusing on both landscapes and wildlife in order to greatly reduce lens changes.

My exact cameras and use as well. I also agree with the comments that we need more info. Tough to give advice if we don;t know what the requirement and objectives are.


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GregDunn
Goldmember
Avatar
1,289 posts
Likes: 132
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Indiana
     
May 16, 2015 18:53 |  #5

If you're looking for a camera with narrower FoV (more "reach"), world-class autofocus, and extremely low sensor pattern noise (very useful for astrophotography) you can't beat the 7D mk II. The 6D is a budget full frame with excellent dynamic range and low light performance. I have a 5D mk III (full frame) and a 7d Mk II in my bag, so I can choose the best type of camera for the task - though there is a fair amount of overlap these days.


Canon 1Dx | 5D3 | 7D2 | 6D | 70-200L f/2.8IS | 70-200L f/4 | 24-70L f/2.8 | 24-105L f/4IS | 100-400L f/4.5-5.6IS | 17-55 f/2.8IS | 50 f/1.8 | 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 | 4x Godox AD360

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
notimetochill
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
521 posts
Likes: 273
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Sweden
     
May 16, 2015 19:10 as a reply to  @ Scott M's post |  #6

I apologize all. why an additional camera is to avoid having to change lenses all the time and I can use different lenses for different purposes simultaneously. My 6D has been a great camera for animals & nature. using its fine picture quality and good performance at high ISO, it has been a must for my lens. I have 17-40L, 50 / 1.8, 90 Marco, 70-200 / 4L and 150-600 vc. I rarely shoot in the middle of the day, I photograph mostly early morning and late evening. the question is, If 7D mk2 is the best choice in those situations. Keep in mind that I live in Sweden where we do not have many hours of sunshine during a year.


SRFOTO (Homepage) (external link) - MY INSTAGRAM (external link) MY FACEBOOK (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rgs
Goldmember
Avatar
2,430 posts
Gallery: 176 photos
Likes: 1435
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
     
May 16, 2015 19:45 |  #7

I have come from a 50D to a 7DII. I considered a 6D at the time. It would have been an IQ upgrade over my 50D with, probably, similar capabilities as far as AF and other handling qualities go and would have been more than adequate for my paying work. So the choice was state of the art professional crop or bare bones FF. After a good deal of thought, I decided to get the most advanced crop sensor available and then consider FF later.

I have been more than pleased with the 7DII. IQ is surprisingly good, the RAW files are capable of things in PP that I never saw in my 50D files, the high ISO performance is very good, and the configuration possibilities and options are simple astonishing. And I have been using it in ways I would never have used my 50D or, most likely, a 6D. The only camera(s) I can think of that would provide as many professional possibilities are the 5DIII and 1DX.

So, decide if the 7DII will fit in a niche in your work, but don't expect a lesser camera, just a different one. And be prepared to learn things you probably have not considered before. Hope that helps.


Canon 7d MkII, Canon 50D, Pentax 67, Canon 30D, Baker Custom 4x5, Canon EF 24-104mm f4, Canon EF 100mm f2.8 Macro, Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC

The Singular Image (external link)Richard Smith Photography (external link)
Richard Smith Real Estate Photography (external link)500PX (external link)
Fine Art America (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott ­ M
Goldmember
3,399 posts
Gallery: 111 photos
Likes: 517
Joined May 2008
Location: Michigan / South Carolina
Post edited over 8 years ago by Scott M.
     
May 16, 2015 20:08 as a reply to  @ notimetochill's post |  #8

Based on your reply, I think a 7D2 would be a good choice as a 2nd body. Your 150-600 VC would mate well with it for wildlife shooting, while your 6D could be used for general nature shots with your 17-40L or macros with your 90mm macro. The 7D2 has excellent high ISO performance for a crop body, so you should not lose much low light performance over your 6D. You also gain more "reach" via the crop sensor, and a more advanced AF system for wildlife in motion.

The two bodies would give you a very versatile combination. And there is certainly nothing preventing you from still using the 6D with the 150-600 in extreme lighting conditions, but you will probably find it rare when the 7D2 will not suffice.


Photo Gallery (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
May 16, 2015 20:08 |  #9

if you're happy with your focal length, get another 6D, if not, and you want more reach or really fast bursts, get the 7D2. You have nice landscapes on your website, and you may be disappointed with the IQ of the 7D compared to the 6D. 600mm is pretty good reach, and the lens does not outresolve the 6D, so you'de get minimal gain with the 7D2 and it's crop factor. Slightly different story if you're longest lens were a 100-400mkii. It would still depend if you were focal length limited or not.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FarmerTed1971
fondling the 5D4
Avatar
7,352 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 5909
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Portland, OR
     
May 16, 2015 20:39 |  #10

Charlie wrote in post #17559220 (external link)
You have nice landscapes on your website, and you may be disappointed with the IQ of the 7D compared to the 6D.

I don't quite understand... can you extrapolate a bit?


Getting better at this - Fuji X-t5 & X-t3 - 16 1.4 - 35/50/90 f2 - 50-140 - flickr (external link) - www.scottaticephoto.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
May 16, 2015 21:05 |  #11

notimetochill wrote in post #17559163 (external link)
I apologize all. why an additional camera is to avoid having to change lenses all the time and I can use different lenses for different purposes simultaneously. My 6D has been a great camera for animals & nature. using its fine picture quality and good performance at high ISO, it has been a must for my lens. I have 17-40L, 50 / 1.8, 90 Marco, 70-200 / 4L and 150-600 vc. I rarely shoot in the middle of the day, I photograph mostly early morning and late evening. the question is, If 7D mk2 is the best choice in those situations. Keep in mind that I live in Sweden where we do not have many hours of sunshine during a year.

Heya,

The 7DII would be excellent, give you some options you lack on the 6D, so you have good options for full frame and APS-C, it's better to have a bunch of tools and these provide a lot of the near-best of both worlds in just two bodies. If this route is an option, I'd do it over twin 6D's. If you live at ISO 12,800 all the time, then stick with the 6D or consider a 1D4.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
notimetochill
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
521 posts
Likes: 273
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Sweden
     
May 16, 2015 21:40 |  #12

thanks for all the answers :) it will be difficult this. one of the main points of the 7D except good autofocus is the fine autofocus when shooting video, I have thought of filming more and more in the future. it differs 450 USD in price between these cameras. The 6D I have thought of is the version without Wi-Fi, and GPS. money money ......


SRFOTO (Homepage) (external link) - MY INSTAGRAM (external link) MY FACEBOOK (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
notimetochill
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
521 posts
Likes: 273
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Sweden
     
May 17, 2015 11:10 |  #13

Or maybe a 760D/70D + new lens? The same price as a 6D


SRFOTO (Homepage) (external link) - MY INSTAGRAM (external link) MY FACEBOOK (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lbsimon
...never exercised in my life
Avatar
2,685 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 272
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Boston, MA
     
May 21, 2015 11:40 |  #14

notimetochill wrote in post #17559820 (external link)
Or maybe a 760D/70D + new lens? The same price as a 6D

I have a combination of the 6D/70D. The 70D is a very capable camera for wildlife and birds, it is mostly used with the 100-400L II lens. Sometimes I even add the 1.4x II TC, but then the focusing is only manual with this lens. The 7DII can do AF when at F/8.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lbsimon
...never exercised in my life
Avatar
2,685 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 272
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Boston, MA
     
May 21, 2015 11:41 |  #15

notimetochill wrote in post #17559163 (external link)
...Keep in mind that I live in Sweden where we do not have many hours of sunshine during a year.

I thought that in summer you have no nighttime!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,157 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Two 6Ds vs One 6D and One 7D MKII ?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is EBiffany
1401 guests, 102 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.