....just wish they didn't cost more then the lenses I own
Makes the switch to Fuji non attractive.
May 21, 2015 18:33 | #1 ....just wish they didn't cost more then the lenses I own A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Qlayer2 OOOHHH! Pretty Moth! More info | May 22, 2015 11:14 | #2 I'm making a trial run- picked up the XE-2 and 35mm f/1.4. I also picked up some adapters to use my legacy glass with it as well. If I like the system, the XT-10 looks interesting as a next body.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 22, 2015 11:28 | #3 The new Fuji X-T10 looks interesting. I've been eyeing an x100t or S for a while. The T10 looks like it would be similar while still having the option to shoot with something besides the built in fixed lens of the X100's. Fuji makes some small primes it may be something I do in the near future but it would be more of a second camera/casual to replace my G15 Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 22, 2015 12:15 | #4 well I can pick up the fisheye... they have the 10mm 2.8 wide angle... the wide angle zoom, the normal 2.8 zoom and the tele 2.8 zoom. They have primes in the 24/35/50/85/135 equivalent to the canon glass 1.4/1.4/1.4/1.2/2 respectively A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lumens Senior Member 461 posts Likes: 93 Joined Dec 2013 Location: Mesa, AZ More info | May 22, 2015 18:37 | #5 my Xt1 arrived two days ago - so far i am impressed. Picked up the 18-55 & 55-200 lenses with it. i have not had a chance to take it out and do a real evaluation, but I am looking forward to getting out this weekend FUJI XT-2 & FUJI XT-3 ->
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bobbyz Cream of the Crop 20,506 posts Likes: 3479 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA More info Post edited over 8 years ago by bobbyz. | May 26, 2015 22:44 | #6 I got 14mm f2.8, 23mm f1.4, 35mm f1.4, 56mm f1.2, 55-200mm, 50-140mm f2.8 OS and looking forward to the newer 16mm f1.4 and 90mm f2. Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 26, 2015 22:45 | #7 bobbyz wrote in post #17572689 I got 14mm f2.8, 23mm f1.4, 35mm f1.4, 56mm f1.2, 55-200mm, 50-140mm f2.8 OS and looking forward to the newer 16mm f1.4 and 90mm f2. All are excellent lenses and love those aperture rings.Just wish they had a 300mm 2.8 equal A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bobbyz Cream of the Crop 20,506 posts Likes: 3479 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Me too though a zoom would be nicer for sports. Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aus.Morgo Senior Member More info | May 27, 2015 05:18 | #9 The XT-1 makes it attractive for me, not that I plan on switching over. Grab a 56mm and 50-140 and I'm good to go
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 27, 2015 09:11 | #10 Aus.Morgo wrote in post #17572902 The XT-1 makes it attractive for me, not that I plan on switching over. Grab a 56mm and 50-140 and I'm good to go ![]() Natural light and the 56 1.2: Fuji X....BAAAAM! Renders way different than Sony.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MedicineMan4040 The Magic Johnson of Cameras More info | May 27, 2015 09:50 | #11 56 1.2=Primo lens. I'm on the verge on a Lumix 42.5 F1.2 which is maybe close. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yep. Even makes nice 13 point star bursts at smaller apertures. I hope you get that Lumix 42.5, cause I want to see the images you get with that lens, MM! Fuji X....BAAAAM! Renders way different than Sony.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 27, 2015 21:37 | #13 I don't see why I don't move over. I think it's about money at this point... hard for me to take the loss selling and spending premium money on the XT-1 w/ it's stable of $999 lenses. A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
windpig Chopped liver More info Post edited over 8 years ago by windpig. | May 27, 2015 21:50 | #14 Talley wrote in post #17574015 I don't see why I don't move over. I think it's about money at this point... hard for me to take the loss selling and spending premium money on the XT-1 w/ it's stable of $999 lenses. I know the feeling, but it was worth the move, although I'm hanging onto my 5DIII, 70-200 f2.8II, TS-E17, TS-E24II, TS-E90, 24 f1.2I. The Fujinon 55-140 bokeh is to crazy for me, I just don't like it with a lot of backgrounds. The 90mm looks interesting. The 16-55 is killer, as is the 56. It's nice to have less weight to carry around. The files are really nice. Oh, and it's nice to have a kit that is weather resistant (X-T1 with the 16-55). Would you like to buy a vowel?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 28, 2015 08:31 | #15 Talley wrote in post #17574015 I don't see why I don't move over. I think it's about money at this point... hard for me to take the loss selling and spending premium money on the XT-1 w/ it's stable of $999 lenses.
Fuji X....BAAAAM! Renders way different than Sony.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1456 guests, 129 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||