Well done..
Way to put the tools together and show the finished product.
110yd
110yd Senior Member 790 posts Likes: 35 Joined Jan 2005 More info | Well done..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
abbadon31 Goldmember More info | Jun 04, 2015 18:54 | #47 MalVeauX wrote in post #17584320 Heya, Playing around with the cheetahstand and a speedlite and a 43" umbrella, while I wait for my other stuff to eventually come in and actually work (the strobe and 48" octa). ![]() Above is the cheestastand with 2 coke cans in the counter weight bag, holding the boom up high with a yongnuo 560III with generic battery pack attached, 1/4th CTO Gel on the flash, with 43" westscott umbrella. Decent breeze going and it felt rock solid. I know I'll need more counter weight when I move to my strobe and octa. I have bungees & stakes for that too to ensure stability when that time comes. Camera is a 5D with an EF 85 F1.8, with a 3 stop ND filter on (Marumi 3 stop) and rubber lens hood. Yongnuo RF603C transceiver, and I'm using a remote trigger to trip the camera so I can "selfie" test. It's about 4pm, very bright out (Florida) with sun behind where I'll be sitting, so back lit very strongly. Here's the image with no filters, no flash, and shutter to normal exposure of what the subject would be (me). Sky is blown out of course at wide aperture (F2.8 here). ![]() Here's the image with the 3 stop ND filter onboard, and I opened the aperture to F2 to get a little more light back. I now have the sky thanks to the ND filter preserved better and ambient light is dropped below sunny 16 standards. You can see the backlighting from the sun. It's my free rim light. The rest is full flash exposure from the speedlite through the umbrella suspended above me to camera right, acting as fill. I think it's obvious to see the difference between the bleaching sun on my shirt and the fill light from the flash doing the rest of the work. I think I was able to match the flash & gel to ambient light enough for it to not look like obvious "flash" but rather just filled in. Could use critique on that from anyone! ![]() Can't wait to get the strobe back in working condition. The flash was barely able to muscle through at 1/1 power, with the gel & umbrella at decently close distance. Very best, Great looking stand I AM SHOM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 04, 2015 19:07 | #48 Thanks for recommending the Cheetahstand, it is exactly what I was after minus a huge price tag. Sturdy and heavy enough. I won't hold the RoveLight & 48" octa at full extension on that boom arm, but not very much out there can anyways, and I'll be bungee/staking it down for those times. Overall great build. Heavy duty enough for this kind of use. Holds the speedlite & umbrella in breeze no problem with just a little bit of counter weight and it was off balance even then. So it's a great little stand. I can't wait to get the monolight in and use it up high and down out of frame.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
abbadon31 Goldmember More info | Jun 04, 2015 19:13 | #49 MalVeauX wrote in post #17584508 New question: is gelling possible for these kinds of strobes? I looked around and saw a few things, but nothing really stood out. Do you use CTO's when shooting with your strobes for your outdoor portrait (like that desert stuff)? Very best, You can add some alligator clips and some elastic on the rod of the softbox to hold the gels. I shoot between 11am to 1pm at high noon so the flash and the ambient light is the same kelvin. If I shoot at sunset I just change my Kelvin on the camera, but would be better if I used gels. I AM SHOM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 04, 2015 19:40 | #50 abbadon31 wrote in post #17584520 You can add some alligator clips and some elastic on the rod of the softbox to hold the gels. I shoot between 11am to 1pm at high noon so the flash and the ambient light is the same kelvin. If I shoot at sunset I just change my Kelvin on the camera, but would be better if I used gels. Thanks,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 05, 2015 13:12 | #51 110yd wrote in post #17583276 Don't want to change the drift of the thread, but what kind of "SHIP DATE" have you received on the 48' Ez-Pro Octa? I ordered one on Monday, and yesterday I received an out of stock notice.... But they did promptly charge my CC. Regards, 110yd Heya,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
110yd Senior Member 790 posts Likes: 35 Joined Jan 2005 More info | I also received a shipping notice and the tracking number on a Ez-Pro 48 Octa. Looking forward to putting it to work soon.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 05, 2015 16:57 | #54 Heya, I'm finding the Cheetahstand and it's accessories I use to be portable enough to walk around with no problem. I like that. IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/tUo5r3 IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/uc9aFP Serious extension on the boom and got it right over head of subject at 45 degrees roughly. Again, counter weight (4 coke cans) and bungee-staked to the ground. Held solid. IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/uc8XWr My bungee-staking. Two 9 inch stakes, I drove into the ground, they're nylon. I just stepped on them to push them in. 24" bungee latched to them. It held the stand like a rock, it was very tight. I think this will hold the monolight & octa (maybe not at full extension, but out on the boom about 3 feet or so with counter weight I think is feasible). ** Update: Wife was apparently watching me from inside and nabbed this, kind of shows the distance of light to subject better: IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/uhA1V4 ********* Results from today at two different angles for background comp, I wanted one with sky to show the color capture at F2 in the sun. And another one with a dark background for the pop. 5D 85 F1.8 @ F2 ISO 100 1/100s 3 Stop Marumi ND filter 1 Stop Marumi CPL Yongnuo 560 III (no gel) at full power 2.5~3feet distance of light source to subject; achieved it as actual exposure and not just fill I think this time which is what I want. IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/uby7VY IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/ubWGYB IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/tUudze Slowly getting there. Critique and advise welcome! Very best,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
abbadon31 Goldmember More info | Jun 05, 2015 17:00 | #55 Digging the pipe great info I AM SHOM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MalVeauX THREAD STARTER "Looks rough and well used" More info Post edited over 8 years ago by MalVeauX. (4 edits in all) | Jun 07, 2015 14:52 | #56 Heya, IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/uhLy6N Results: (Overall, I think I dropped ambient too much now that I'm looking at it inside and not on the back of an LCD; I probably didn't need the ND in this light looking back. Live and learn!) XSi + 40 STM: IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/uimchz IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/tmjygK IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/tm9jrb 5D + 85 F1.8: IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/uib2SX 5D + Helios 44-2 (58mm F2): IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/tm9EXm Feedback welcome on lighting! Including ambient to light exposure, too dark, etc, and color (I'm half colorblind, so never know when I've gone too warm!) Why did I use an XSi at all? Why did I use a 30 year old manual lens? Testing out the importance of gear versus lighting to see what's more critical to what I like in portraits... light, or expensive glass and big high dynamic range sensors... we shall see! ** Looking back, I think my rim light was too harsh and powered up too much, I should have shot it about 2 stops lower. Will experiment with that and try to soften that light up there. Just looks harsh looking at it now. *** Still awaiting my Ez Pro 48" Octa, should arrive this coming week. *** Still awaiting my RoveLight back from Adorama.... sigh! Very best,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Jun 07, 2015 16:18 | #57 I'd prwfer a bit more ambient, the dark trees behind are just not adding anything. Youve done rwasobly well separating yourself, but if its that dark it might as well be all black.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 07, 2015 16:31 | #58 gonzogolf wrote in post #17587768 I'd prwfer a bit more ambient, the dark trees behind are just not adding anything. Youve done rwasobly well separating yourself, but if its that dark it might as well be all black. Agreed, looking back when I got inside, I realized just how dark ambient got, will probably redo just to see the difference with added 2~3 stops of ambient to see the balance.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LeftHandedBrisket Combating camera shame since 1977... More info | Jun 07, 2015 16:50 | #59 notice the bare flash just catching the tip of your nose in the last two, this is something i don't like to see. PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 07, 2015 17:11 | #60 Left Handed Brisket wrote in post #17587823 notice the bare flash just catching the tip of your nose in the last two, this is something i don't like to see. you also have a significant color balance difference between the two light sources. Might be due to the lack of an umbrella on that flash. If there is going to be a difference, I would want the rear to be warmer to approximate a setting sun. Thanks!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1404 guests, 113 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||